Literature DB >> 28646852

The facial expression of schizophrenic patients applied with infrared thermal facial image sequence.

Bo-Lin Jian1, Chieh-Li Chen1, Wen-Lin Chu2, Min-Wei Huang3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a neurological disease characterized by alterations to patients' cognitive functions and emotional expressions. Relevant studies often use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain to explore structural differences and responsiveness within brain regions. However, as this technique is expensive and commonly induces claustrophobia, it is frequently refused by patients. Thus, this study used non-contact infrared thermal facial images (ITFIs) to analyze facial temperature changes evoked by different emotions in moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients.
METHODS: Schizophrenia is an emotion-related disorder, and images eliciting different types of emotions were selected from the international affective picture system (IAPS) and presented to subjects during ITFI collection. ITFIs were aligned using affine registration, and the changes induced by small irregular head movements were corrected. The average temperatures from the forehead, nose, mouth, left cheek, and right cheek were calculated, and continuous temperature changes were used as features. After performing dimensionality reduction and noise removal using the component analysis method, multivariate analysis of variance and the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithm were used to identify moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients.
RESULTS: Analysis of five facial areas indicated significant temperature changes in the forehead and nose upon exposure to various emotional stimuli and in the right cheek upon evocation of high valence low arousal (HVLA) stimuli. The most significant P-value (lower than 0.001) was obtained in the forehead area upon evocation of disgust. Finally, when the features of forehead temperature changes in response to low valence high arousal (LVHA) were reduced to 9 using dimensionality reduction and noise removal, the identification rate was as high as 94.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that features obtained in the forehead, nose, and right cheek significantly differed between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients. We then chose the features that most effectively distinguish between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients using the SVM. These results demonstrate that the ITFI analysis protocol proposed in this study can effectively provide reference information regarding the phase of the disease in patients with schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affine registration; Emotion assessment; Schizophrenia; Skin temperature; Thermal imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28646852      PMCID: PMC5483292          DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1387-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Psychiatry        ISSN: 1471-244X            Impact factor:   3.630


Background

Although studies using schizophrenia-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalograms can help in understanding structural differences in the brain and the responsiveness within brain regions, numerous restrictions related to MRI, including high cost and reluctance of subjects to undergo such testing, limit the use of these procedures [1]. Schizophrenia is a degenerative neurological disease, leading to 20% of a patient’s lifetime being spent as years lived with disability (YLDs) [2]. Many studies have been conducted for schizophrenia, which understandably involves a wide range of aspects; however, the results of these studies vary greatly. As heterogeneity among patients is frequently not taken into account by investigators when analyzing data, the features specific to certain variant phases of the disease often remain undetected, hindering an in-depth understanding of the symptoms. In this study, we used a digital infrared thermal image system (DITIS) to image the subjects and measure their temperatures without contact, which enabled us to conduct an in-depth analysis and quantification of the thermal state upon evocation of emotions in schizophrenia patients with reduced heterogeneity. Since each person’s subjective judgment is influenced by psychological and physiological factors, and subjective factors can alter psychological and physiological responses and influence the evaluation of emotion, studies addressing emotions often use non-subjective methods to evoke emotional responses. Inner emotion and cognitive activity can be reflected through facial expressions, behavioral responses, sound, etc. Facial expression represents a type of non-verbal interaction; thus, in recent years, many studies have explored the identification of facial expression under visible light [3, 4]. However, these studies use a common blind spot, in which non-spontaneous expression of emotions can be camouflaged, resulting in misjudgment of emotions [5]. In addition to this blind spot, recognition of facial expression is also influenced by environmental illumination and face poses, leading to system identification errors [6]. Therefore, many studies have started to use infrared thermal facial images (ITFIs) technology, as it reduces the impact of lighting and offers the advantage of a non-contact approach, which is suitable for human psychological and physiological studies [7-12]. Moreover, it has been shown that many health and emotional states are associated with variations in facial temperature [13-17]. During ITFI collection, subjects’ heads are not stabilized in order to make them feel as comfortable and natural as possible, but this can cause difficulties for subsequent analyses. Therefore, the calibration and alignment of images become very important. Image calibration can be performed using two methods: one based on features and the other on areas. Image-based calibration is not suitable for situations with significant nonlinear differences [18]. Moreover, the characteristics of infrared thermal images are different from those of images taken under visible light [19]. In summary, we used ITFI to investigate changes in the variation of the temperature in each facial area upon visual stimulation-evoked emotions. Based on our results, we were able to successfully differentiate between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients.

Methods

Participants

The PANSS test is commonly applied in the clinical identification of schizophrenia. In this study, we used the total scores of PANSS to classify all participants into moderately ill and markedly ill groups [20, 21]. There were 18 patients in the moderately ill group (mean age: 42.61 ± 7.16 years; age of illness onset: 26.8 ± 8.75 years old; illness duration: 17.56 ± 6.65 years; 8 men, 10 women; medication (e.g., chlorpromazine equivalent, mg): 183.33 ± 103.41 mg) and 17 patients in the markedly ill group(mean age: 42.47 ± 7.67 years; age of illness onset: 24.59 ± 6.69 years old; illness duration: 18.53 ± 7.32 years; 9 men, 8 women; medication (e.g., chlorpromazine equivalent, mg): 223.35 ± 100.22 mg) as shown in Table 1. Demographic data such as age, sex, age of illness onset, illness duration and medication were not different between the two groups.
Table 1

Comparison of demographic characteristics between moderately ill and markedly ill schizophrenia patients

Demographic variablesModerately ill (n = 18)Markedly ill (n = 17) P value
Age (Years)42.61 ± 7.1642.47 ± 7.670.940
Sex (Male/Female)8/109/80.627
Age of illness onset (y/o)26.5 ± 8.7524.59 ± 6.690.475
Illness duration (years)17.56 ± 6.6518.53 ± 7.320.683
Medication (e.g., chlorpromazine equivalent, mg)183.33 ± 103.41222.35 ± 100.220.266
PANSS scores
Total75.06 ± 14.65100.65 ± 11.660.000
Positive17.22 ± 3.4927.76 ± 3.600.000
Negative19.78 ± 5.2924 ± 3.880.011
Global38.06 ± 8.5248.88 ± 6.520.000
Comparison of demographic characteristics between moderately ill and markedly ill schizophrenia patients The participants were recruited from the outpatient clinic at the Department of Psychiatry, Chiayi and Wanqiao Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan. Participants underwent screening that included their medical and psychiatric histories, laboratory test results, an illicit drug screening, and a physical examination. A psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia was established using the structured clinical interview from the DSM-IV and a semi-structured interview conducted by a research psychiatrist [22]. After receiving a complete explanation of the study procedures, all participants provided written informed consent as approved by the institutional review board. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Taichung Veterans General Hospital, and was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice procedures and the current revision of the Declaration of Helsinki [23].

Stimuli and paradigm

Lang et al. recorded the sensitivity of subjects to image stimuli, and objectively established the visual complexity and emotional response rating criteria [24]. They built an emotional stimulus database called the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), which include more than 1000 color images (see http://csea.phhp.ufl.edu/Media.html). Similar to several previous studies IAPS has clear content, test-retest reliability, and contains many different categories of pictures such as human emotions (e.g., happy, sad, disgust and angry) with different figure photo types and articles [25-27]. Using IAPS images, subjects can induce personal emotional experiences and reactions. Many studies use IAPS as visual stimuli to evaluate emotional and electrophysiological responses. We have also used IAPS images to evoke different emotions in subjects. We selected 45 images for a questionnaire survey to be filled out by 100 normal individuals (48 males with a mean age of 35.94 ± 12.38 and 52 females with a mean age of 37.45 ± 14.14) who were born and raised in Taiwan. These emotional pictures were divided into valence and arousal with dimensions, and the nine-point Likert scale was used for analysis. The results divided into three different types of emotion called HVLA (High Valence Low Arousal; valence: 7.42 ± 0.51 arousal: 4.77 ± 0.37), LVLA (Low Valence Low Arousal; valence: 3.26 ± 0.53 arousal: 4.55 ± 0.86) and LVHA. (Low Valence High Arousal; valence: 1.21 ± 0.59 arousal: 6.45 ± 0.56). The film was split into fragments separated by breaks. The film lasted 225 s in total, and there were 9 breaks lasting 10 s each. Each segment evoked 3 types of emotions and lasted 15 s, and there were 3 segments for each emotions type. Each segment consisted of 5 images, and each image was presented for 3 s. The order and the duration of image presentation is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the relationship between the time and the order of the images. During each test, each picture was displayed for 3 s, and patients were allowed 10 s of rest after one stimulation unit that consisted of five pictures of the same type. The three types of emotion appeared three times over the course of the entire 225 s test time

Schematic diagram of the relationship between the time and the order of the images. During each test, each picture was displayed for 3 s, and patients were allowed 10 s of rest after one stimulation unit that consisted of five pictures of the same type. The three types of emotion appeared three times over the course of the entire 225 s test time

Thermal image data acquisition

A digital infrared thermal image system (DITIS) (Spectrum 9000-MB Series; United Integrated Service Co. Ltd.) was used to collect images. The collected ITFI were 320 × 240 temperature matrix data, and the sampling rate was 2 frames per second (fps). During data collection, access to the experimental venue was prevented in order to avoid strong environmental convection and to maintain the ambient temperature between 26 °C and 28 °C. The interior of the room was covered by three layers of shades to minimize heat radiation. To ensure the rights and safety of the subjects and under the principle of comfort and minimal harm, the head was not stabilized during the experimental process.

Image registration processing

The presentation of IAPS images to the subjects was performed according to previously established order and duration, and the ITFI were collected simultaneously with the presentation. The subsequent procedures are shown in Fig. 2. To ensure the comfort of and minimal harm to the subjects, their head was not fixed during the collection of experimental data, which led to slight shifts of ITFIs over time and was unfavorable for subsequent analysis. Thus, affine registration processing technology was used to reduce the variation of sequential images in order to ensure the appropriate overlapping of facial image locations. This process negates the influence of facial movements on the validity of facial area correlation analyses. For calibration, center-of-mass localization of the binocular area, image translation, and flip were mainly used to generate fixed images for the calibration. Then, the two-stage genetic algorithm (GA) was used to automatically complete affine registration of ITFIs. This method effectively improved the overlap error before and after image calibration, effectively compensating for spontaneous, small, unconscious movements of the human face [28].
Fig. 2

Experimental procedure. First, ITFIs are collected and calibrated. The calibration process can minimize the variation of facial images caused by movements. Then, each person’s forehead, nose, mouth, left cheek, and right cheek areas are selected. The average skin temperature in each area is calculated. For features extraction, average temperatures are obtained according to the time sequence of visual stimulation generated by emotion pictures. MANOVA and SVM classifier are used to analyze and identify moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients

Experimental procedure. First, ITFIs are collected and calibrated. The calibration process can minimize the variation of facial images caused by movements. Then, each person’s forehead, nose, mouth, left cheek, and right cheek areas are selected. The average skin temperature in each area is calculated. For features extraction, average temperatures are obtained according to the time sequence of visual stimulation generated by emotion pictures. MANOVA and SVM classifier are used to analyze and identify moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients

Features extraction and analysis

From calibrated thermal sequential images of each subject, images of five areas including the forehead, nose, mouth, left cheek, and right cheek were selected for analysis, and the average temperature of each area was calculated. Since the test lasted for 225 s and the FPS of the DITIS was 2, there were a total of 450 features per facial area. Based on the stimulation time for each type of emotion, 48 features per type (HVLA, LVLA, and LVHA) were established. After reducing data dimensions using principal component analysis (PCA), nine features per type of emotion were obtained, and less important information was filtered out [29]. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used for statistical analysis, while a support vector machine (SVM) was used as a classifier to train and identify the results. Well-known identification algorithms included neural network (NN), SVM, learning vector quantization (LVQ), and other intelligent classifiers. To address the issues related to multi-class identification and quickly establish the available identifier structure in addition to verifying the feasibility of the procedure, this study used the “classification learner” application of Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) R2015b (MathWorks, USA) to obtain SVM training and classification.

Results

MANOVA of facial areas in response to evoked emotions in moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients

According to the experimental procedure shown in Fig. 2, P-values obtained from the forehead, nose, mouth, left cheek, and right cheek following evocation of HVLA, LVLA, and LVHA in moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients were analyzed. The p-value for the MANOVA was calculated using Wilks’ Lambda. The groups of moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients were considered independent variables, while the features of emotions corresponding to their facial areas were taken as dependent variables, as shown in Table 2. The results indicated that the difference in the average temperature changes in the forehead area between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients was the most significant. Upon evocation of three types of emotion in this area, the differences were all highly significant, including the P-value under evoked LVHA, which was lower than 0.001and represented the highest level of significance. In addition, the differences in the nose area under the three types were all significant, especially under evoked LVLA where the P-value was most significant at0.002. In addition, the P-value obtained for the right cheek area under evoked HVLA was 0.018.
Table 2

MANOVA results for each facial area under three evoked emotions in moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients

Emotion types (number of features)
HVLA (9)LVLA (9)LVHA (9)No Stimulus (9)
Facial regionForeheadF-value4.7514.6387.3034.741
P-value0.001**0.001**0.000***0.001**
NoseF-value3.2014.1012.4572.670
P-value0.01*0.002**0.037*0.025*
MouthF-value1.3241.2470.7091.349
P-value0.2740.3120.6130.263
Left CheekF-value1.5262.1261.0381.321
P-value0.1910.0660.4370.276
Right CheekF-value2.8650.9800.9802.583
P-value0.018*0.4790.4790.087

According to the variable for the feature and factors in the fixation of group

P-value <0.05* P-value <0.01** P-value <0.001***

“F” is F-value. “P-value” is significance

MANOVA results for each facial area under three evoked emotions in moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients According to the variable for the feature and factors in the fixation of group P-value <0.05* P-value <0.01** P-value <0.001*** “F” is F-value. “P-value” is significance

SVM identification results using different numbers of features

The difference in average temperature changes between the moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients was the most significant in the forehead area under evoked LVHA (Table 2). Thus, when the 48 features were reduced to 8–10 using dimensional reduction by PCA, identification was performed by linear, quadratic, cubic, and medium Gaussian kernels of the SVM classifier using different numbers of features. The results are shown in Table 3. The highest identification rates for 9 features were obtained using quadratic and medium Gaussian kernels (up to 94.3%), followed by linear and cubic kernels (91.4%). The identification rates of the remaining features ranged from 77.1 to 91.4%, and the highest average rate was obtained when the number of features was 9, indicating the greatest difference between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients in this context.
Table 3

SVM identification results using different numbers of features

ClassifierKernelLVHA (8)LVHA (9)LVHA (10)LVHA (11)LVHA (12)
SVMLinear91.491.491.488.682.9
Quadratic88.694.388.68080
Cubic82.991.485.782.977.1
Medium Gaussian91.494.388.68088.6
SVM identification results using different numbers of features

Discussion

Many studies conducted on thermal imaging measure the temperature response in the orbit as an index [30-33], but such measurements are inconvenient for subjects with myopia who need to wear glasses. Forehead measurements overcome such restrictions, in addition to those arising when subjects wearing contact lenses are reluctant to undergo the orbit test. In a study by Colin et al., an association between the forehead and emotions was observed [34]. Zhu et al. confirmed these findings and used thermal imaging of the forehead as a polygraph with a success rate of 76.3% [35]. In addition, studies on psychological stress demonstrated that temperature changes in the nose were highly correlated with stress [36, 37]. Using thermal imaging, Ioannou et al. also found that temperature changes in the nose area were associated with emotions [38]. These results are consistent with the statistically significant changes in the forehead and nose observed in this study. They showed that under evoked HVLA, LVLA, and HVLA, average temperature changes in the forehead and nose reflect the differences between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients. The difference in average temperature change in the right cheek upon the evocation of HVLA was also significant. Studies have addressed the effect of frontal brain asymmetry on emotional reactivity. The left prefrontal lobe has been associated with hyperarousability and positive emotions, while the right prefrontal lobe has been related to emotion avoidance and stronger negative emotions [39, 40]. The results in Table 2 show an important difference in the right cheek temperature variation between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients following exposure to HVLA stimuli. Positive emotion induced a strong response in the left prefrontal cortex, effectively reflecting the differences in the right cheek. The results of this study are consistent with the theory of frontal brain asymmetry and emotional reactivity. In addition, Table 2 shows the features in the forehead and nose obtained during rest for which the differences were also statistically significant. We believe that these features may reflect temperature changes that occur after emotional stimulation. If more pictures (emotional stimuli) had been used, the statistical results for the no stimulus values may have been more significant. As this result was consistent with the statistical results from the forehead, the results obtained from rest values were used as a baseline standard and were not included in the investigation on emotional responses in moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients. Dimension reduction using the PCA method [29] was employed to reduce the number of features under evoked LVHA, and different kernels in the SVM classifier were then used to identify moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients. The results showed that the recognition rate of quadratic and medium Gaussian kernels for 9 features was 94.3%, which also revalidated the MANOVA results presented in Table 2. The average temperature change in the forehead area under evoked LVHA may represent a distinguishing feature between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients. This result is very exciting. Using the analysis model presented in this study and a sufficiently large database, a reliable mathematical model could be generated. In the future, data could be collected as described in this study and entered into a model to predict a subject’s condition, which could be used as a reference for the evaluation of the disease state. In addition, combined with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) and a semi-structured interview conducted by a research psychiatrist, the described method may also be used as an adjuvant identification method for moderately and markedly ill patients. Moreover, this study also provides a reference standard for the choice of classifiers and features.

Conclusions

Under the emotions evoked by visual stimulation, the ITFIs were divided into five areas, the average temperature within each area was calculated, and the continuous average temperature change was used as a feature. Results obtained using MANOVA show that responses in the forehead, nose, and right cheek area were significantly different between moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients. Such a difference in the right cheek is consistent with brain asymmetry and emotional reactivity theory. Finally, we found that the features generated by the largest difference in responses to emotions can effectively identify moderately and markedly ill schizophrenia patients using an SVM. These results demonstrate that the analysis of ITFI described in this study can effectively provide clinical reference information on the disease phase in schizophrenia patients.
  25 in total

1.  Hot or not? Thermal reactions to social contact.

Authors:  Amanda C Hahn; Ross D Whitehead; Marion Albrecht; Carmen E Lefevre; David I Perrett
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Forehead thermal signature extraction in lie detection.

Authors:  Zhen Zhu; Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis; Ioannis Pavlidis
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

3.  Imaging facial signs of neurophysiological responses.

Authors:  Dvijesh Shastri; Arcangelo Merla; Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis; Ioannis Pavlidis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  The neural correlates of the dominance dimension of emotion.

Authors:  Matthew Jerram; Athene Lee; Alyson Negreira; David Gansler
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Featural processing in recognition of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Olivia Beaudry; Annie Roy-Charland; Melanie Perron; Isabelle Cormier; Roxane Tapp
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-09-18

6.  Classifying affective states using thermal infrared imaging of the human face.

Authors:  Brian R Nhan; Tom Chau
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Intranasal oxytocin enhances emotion recognition from dynamic facial expressions and leaves eye-gaze unaffected.

Authors:  Alexander Lischke; Christoph Berger; Kristin Prehn; Markus Heinrichs; Sabine C Herpertz; Gregor Domes
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 8.  A review of brain oscillations in perception of faces and emotional pictures.

Authors:  Bahar Güntekin; Erol Başar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Mom feels what her child feels: thermal signatures of vicarious autonomic response while watching children in a stressful situation.

Authors:  Barbara Manini; Daniela Cardone; Sjoerd J H Ebisch; Daniela Bafunno; Tiziana Aureli; Arcangelo Merla
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Mohsen Naghavi; Rafael Lozano; Catherine Michaud; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya; Joshua A Salomon; Safa Abdalla; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Ilana Ackerman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mohammed K Ali; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Adil N Bahalim; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Lope H Barrero; David H Bartels; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kavi Bhalla; Bishal Bhandari; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; James A Black; Hannah Blencowe; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Audrey Bonaventure; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Tasanee Braithwaite; Carol Brayne; Lisa Bridgett; Simon Brooker; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey Buckle; Christine M Budke; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Roy Burstein; Bianca Calabria; Benjamin Campbell; Charles E Canter; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan Carapetis; Loreto Carmona; Claudia Cella; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Manu Dahiya; Nabila Dahodwala; James Damsere-Derry; Goodarz Danaei; Adrian Davis; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Dellavalle; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Helen Dolk; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Suad Eltahir Ali; Holly Erskine; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Stalin E Ewoigbokhan; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery Feigin; David T Felson; Alize Ferrari; Cleusa P Ferri; Eric M Fèvre; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Louise Flood; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Richard Franklin; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Belinda J Gabbe; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Hammad A Ganatra; Bianca Garcia; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Gerhard Gmel; Richard Gosselin; Rebecca Grainger; Justina Groeger; Francis Guillemin; David Gunnell; Ramyani Gupta; Juanita Haagsma; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Wayne Hall; Diana Haring; Josep Maria Haro; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Hideki Higashi; Catherine Hill; Bruno Hoen; Howard Hoffman; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; John J Huang; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Deborah Jarvis; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Jost B Jonas; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Charles H King; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Ratilal Lalloo; Laura L Laslett; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Yong Yi Lee; James Leigh; Stephen S Lim; Elizabeth Limb; John Kent Lin; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Wei Liu; Maria Loane; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ronan Lyons; Jixiang Ma; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Sivabalan Manivannan; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; Neil McGill; John McGrath; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Michele Meltzer; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ana-Claire Meyer; Valeria Miglioli; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Philip B Mitchell; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Terrie E Moffitt; Ali A Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew Moran; Lidia Morawska; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Michael K Mwaniki; Kovin Naidoo; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Paul K Nelson; Robert G Nelson; Michael C Nevitt; Charles R Newton; Sandra Nolte; Paul Norman; Rosana Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Simon O'Hanlon; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Andrew Page; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Scott B Patten; Neil Pearce; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Michael R Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; Sébastien Pion; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; C Arden Pope; Svetlana Popova; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Rachel L Pullan; Kapa D Ramaiah; Dharani Ranganathan; Homie Razavi; Mathilda Regan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Felipe Rodriguez De Leòn; Luca Ronfani; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; James Graham Scott; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Donald S Shepard; Hwashin Shin; Rupak Shivakoti; David Singh; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Jessica Singleton; David A Sleet; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Jennifer L Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Andrew Steer; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Sana Syed; Giorgio Tamburlini; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Jennifer A Taylor; William J Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; W Murray Thomson; George D Thurston; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marcello Tonelli; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris; Clotilde Ubeda; Eduardo A Undurraga; Marieke J van der Werf; Jim van Os; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; David J Weatherall; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Sean R M Williams; Emma Witt; Frederick Wolfe; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Anita K M Zaidi; Zhi-Jie Zheng; David Zonies; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Computer Vision-Based Assessment of Motor Functioning in Schizophrenia: Use of Smartphones for Remote Measurement of Schizophrenia Symptomatology.

Authors:  Anzar Abbas; Vijay Yadav; Emma Smith; Elizabeth Ramjas; Sarah B Rutter; Caridad Benavidez; Vidya Koesmahargyo; Li Zhang; Lei Guan; Paul Rosenfield; Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez; Isaac R Galatzer-Levy
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-01-21

2.  Analysis of EEG entropy during visual evocation of emotion in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Wen-Lin Chu; Min-Wei Huang; Bo-Lin Jian; Kuo-Sheng Cheng
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.455

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.