Literature DB >> 28646773

Survival outcomes of patients with lobular carcinoma in situ who underwent bilateral mastectomy or partial mastectomy.

Ze-Ming Xie1, Jian Sun2, Zhe-Yu Hu3, Yao-Pan Wu4, Peng Liu1, Jun Tang5, Xiang-Sheng Xiao1, Wei-Dong Wei1, Xi Wang1, Xiao-Ming Xie1, Ming-Tian Yang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the survival outcomes between patients treated with bilateral mastectomy and partial mastectomy alone as the initial surgical management for primary lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed LCIS underwent partial mastectomy alone or bilateral mastectomy were identified by the SEER*Stat database (version 8.3.2) released in 2016. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome measure was breast cancer-specific mortality.
RESULTS: Of the 5964 cases included in the analysis, 208 cases underwent bilateral mastectomy and 5756 cases underwent partial mastectomy alone. The 1-, 5- and 10-year estimated overall survival rates were 99.7%, 96.7% and 91.7%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards regression (Cox) analyses showed no significant difference between the risk of all-cause mortality in the bilateral mastectomy group compared with the partial mastectomy group (HR = 1.106, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.350-3.500, P = 0.86). In propensity score-matched model, bilateral mastectomy still did not show benefit to overall mortality (HR = 2.248, 95% CI 0.451-11.200). Patients older than 60 years of age showed a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 7.593, 95% CI 5.357-10.764, P < 0.0001). No risk factors, including surgery type, were identified for breast cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcomes of patients with LCIS who underwent partial mastectomy without radiotherapy were not inferior to patients who underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast cancer-specific mortality in patients with LCIS was extremely low; aggressive prophylactic surgery like bilateral prophylactic mastectomy should not be advocated for most patients with LCIS.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lobular carcinoma in situ; Partial mastectomy; Prophylactic mastectomy; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28646773     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  3 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary management of CDH1 germinal mutation and prophylactic management hereditary lobular breast cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Sara Mirandola; Francesca Pellini; Eleonora Granuzzo; Maya Lorenzi; Beatrice Accordini; Maurizio Ulgelmo; Alessandra Invento; Davide Lombardi; Marina Caldana; Giovanni Paolo Pollini
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-05

Review 2.  Second International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).

Authors:  Christoph J Rageth; Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; Katja Pinker; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Alexander Mundinger; Thomas Decker; Christoph Tausch; Florian Dammann; Pascal A Baltzer; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Maria P Foschini; Sophie Dellas; Michael Knauer; Caroline Malhaire; Martin Sonnenschein; Andreas Boos; Elisabeth Morris; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Impact of surgical management of primary tumors in stage IV breast cancer patients: a retrospective observational study based on SEER database.

Authors:  Ning Xie; Xiaobo Hu; Yu Tang; Can Tian; Ying He; Zhe-Yu Hu; Chongyu Hu; Xiao Wang; Xiangyan Liu; Liping Liu; Huawu Xiao; Wei Peng; Haoyu Zhou; Quchang Ouyang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.