| Literature DB >> 28646153 |
Soma Banik1, Pranab Kumar Das2,3, Azzedine Bendounan4, Ivana Vobornik5, A Arya6, Nathan Beaulieu4, Jun Fujii5, A Thamizhavel2, P U Sastry7, A K Sinha8, D M Phase9, S K Deb8,10.
Abstract
Rashba spin-orbit splitting in the magnetic materials opens up a new perspective in the field of spintronics. Here, we report a giant Rashba spin-orbit splitting on the PrGe [010] surface in the paramagnetic phase with Rashba coefficient α R = 5 eVÅ. We find that α R can be tuned in this system as a function of temperature at different magnetic phases. Rashba type spin polarized surface states originates due to the strong hybridization between Pr 4f states with the conduction electrons. Significant changes observed in the spin polarized surface states across the magnetic transitions are due to the competition between Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interaction and exchange interaction present in this system. Presence of Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interaction on the topological surface give rise to Saddle point singularity which leads to electron-like and hole-like Rashba spin split bands in the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] directions, respectively. Supporting evidences of Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interaction have been obtained as anisotropic magnetoresistance with respect to field direction and first-order type hysteresis in the X-ray diffraction measurements. A giant negative magnetoresistance of 43% in the antiferromagnetic phase and tunable Rashba parameter with temperature makes this material a suitable candidate for application in the antiferromagnetic spintronic devices.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28646153 PMCID: PMC5482886 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02401-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Crystal structure of bulk PrGe and Brillouin zone with the high-symmetry points. The projected surface 2D Brillouin zone is also shown. Temperature dependent band structure of PrGe [010] surface at the (b) PM phase at 100 K and (c) FM phase at 20 K showing the Rashba spin split bands near the Γ point. In both the PM and FM phase a flat band below E is observed (discussed in text). Detail band structure study at different temperatures is performed to understand the nature of the spin split bands across the magnetic transitions. Rashba SO split bands are shown in a zoomed scale around the Γ point at (d) 100 K, (e) 90 K, (f) 80 K, (g) 70 K, (h) 60 K, (i) 51 K, (j) 42 K, (k) 33 K, (l) 25 K and (m) 20 K.
Figure 2Comparison of the experimental VB with the theoretical DOS calculations: (a) RPES data across the Pr 4d–4f resonance are shown in a contour plot. The inset shows the CIS spectrum for feature A, where the open circle is the experimental data and solid line is the fitted Fano profile. (b) The on-resonance spectrum at hν = 125 eV and off-resonance spectrum at hν = 116 eV along with the difference spectrum. The yellow and red shaded regions in the difference spectrum corresponds to the Pr 4f states and the other valence states respectively. (c) Pr 3d core level with the observed features f 2, f 3 and m marked in the spectrum. In (d–g) we have shown the PDOS of Pr 4f, Pr 5d, Ge 4s and Ge 4p states calculated using GGA method for bulk (black filled circle) and surface slab with Pr terminated surface (blue open triangle). The crystal structure of the surface slab with the anti-parallel orientation of spins of Pr atoms is shown. (h) experimental partial density of Pr 4f state (as in (b), shown by green filled square) compared with the partial density of Pr 4f states from bulk (black filled circle) and the surface slab (blue open triangle) calculations.
Figure 3Experimental band structure compared with the simulated energy dispersion curves and the theoretical band structure calculations: (a–c) shows the experimental band structure at the 100 K (PM phase), 50 K (near AFM phase) and 20 K (FM phase) respectively, compared with the simulated energy dispersion curves in the k direction. The simulation has been carried out with the equation described in the text. Solid and dotted lines represents hole-like and electron-like bands, respectively. E+ (red line) and E− (black line) corresponds to the bands simulated with spin index +1 and −1, respectively. (d,e) shows the experimental band structure at 20 K (FM phase) and 100 K (PM phase) compared with the simulated energy dispersion curves in the k direction. The theoretical band structure of the Pr terminated [010] surface with the anti-parallel spin orientation showing the bands (f) without considering the spin-orbit coupling and (g) with the spin-orbit coupling in the k direction. (h) shows zoomed region of the theoretical band structure calculation along the k (--) direction and (i) shows the zoomed region of theoretical band structure calculation along the k (--) direction.
Figure 4Temperature dependent MR and XRD measurements on PrGe: (a) Field dependence of the MR along the [010] direction performed at different temperatures. The MR is quantified in percentage by the following relation: MR(T, H) = . (b) Zoomed MR in the low field region to show the anisotropic MR behavior w.r.t. field direction. Temperature dependent XRD patterns measured with (c) Cu K laboratory based source and (d) linearly polarized synchrotron source at 13 KeV energy. Inset in (c) shows the rietveld refinement of the X-ray diffraction pattern measured with Cu K source at 38 K confirming the CrB type crystal structure with Cmcm space group. (e) The intensity of the peak A marked in (d) is plotted as a function of temperature which shows a clear hysteresis in both PM to AFM and AFM to FM phase transitions. The hysterisis in XRD pattern is characteristic of the first order nature of the magnetic transition.