Qiunan Lyu1, Chunguang Zhou2, Yueming Song1, Limin Liu1, Lei Wang1, Zhongjie Zhou1. 1. Department of Orthopedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China. 2. Department of Orthopedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China. Electronic address: zhouchunguang@aliyun.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The efficacy of one-stage posterior pedicle screw instrument used in the treatment of non-dystrophic scoliosis in neurofibromatosis type I (NF-1) is unknown. Also, there is no study that has directly compared the results of spinal deformity correction between non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to study the efficacy of a one-stage posterior pedicle screw instrument used in the treatment of non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 and to compare non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 with matched AIS to illustrate the differences. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifteen patients with non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 and 15 patients with AIS underwent a one-stage posterior surgery with the pedicle screw system. OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative whole-spine radiographs were used to determine coronal and sagittal Cobb angles. Also, the distance between the C7 plumb line and the center sacral vertical line and the sagittal vertebral axis was measured to assess spinal balance. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire was used to evaluate functional outcomes. METHODS: We matched 15 patients with non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 with patients with AIS (ratio, 1:1) for age, sex, and degree of major deformity. The overall mean age was 13.4±2.0 and 14.0±2.1 years, respectively. The NF-1 group consisted of 10 boys and 5 girls, and the AIS group consisted of 9 boys and 6 girls. The mean follow-up was 37.6±3.9 and 33.5±5.0 months, respectively. The AIS group underwent end vertebra (EV) or EV+1 fusion. The NF-1 group underwent EV+1, 2, or 3 fusion. Both coronal and sagittal Cobb angles, trunk balance, operative time, blood loss, fusion levels, length of stay, and scores on the SRS-22 questionnaire were compared between the two groups. The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81401760). There were no study-specific conflict of interest-associated biases. RESULTS: The preoperative main curve magnitude was similar between the two groups; however, the flexibility of the NF-1 group tended to be less than that of the AIS group. The rate of correction of the main curve obtained surgically (79.8% compared with 81.1%) was similar in the NF-1 and AIS groups. There were no significant differences in the loss of correction between the two groups (p>.05). Also, there were no significant differences between the groups in operative time, blood loss, fusion levels, screw number, length of stay, trunk balance, and scores on the SRS-22. There were no serious complications related to surgery in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences in preoperative flexibilities and fusion strategies, non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 can be treated with a satisfied correction rate and progression rate similar to comparable AIS by using the one-stage posterior pedicle screw technique. Dural ectasia or thin pedicles in non-dystrophic scoliosis could make pedicle screw placement challenging.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The efficacy of one-stage posterior pedicle screw instrument used in the treatment of non-dystrophic scoliosis in neurofibromatosis type I (NF-1) is unknown. Also, there is no study that has directly compared the results of spinal deformity correction between non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to study the efficacy of a one-stage posterior pedicle screw instrument used in the treatment of non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 and to compare non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 with matched AIS to illustrate the differences. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifteen patients with non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 and 15 patients with AIS underwent a one-stage posterior surgery with the pedicle screw system. OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative whole-spine radiographs were used to determine coronal and sagittal Cobb angles. Also, the distance between the C7 plumb line and the center sacral vertical line and the sagittal vertebral axis was measured to assess spinal balance. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire was used to evaluate functional outcomes. METHODS: We matched 15 patients with non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 with patients with AIS (ratio, 1:1) for age, sex, and degree of major deformity. The overall mean age was 13.4±2.0 and 14.0±2.1 years, respectively. The NF-1 group consisted of 10 boys and 5 girls, and the AIS group consisted of 9 boys and 6 girls. The mean follow-up was 37.6±3.9 and 33.5±5.0 months, respectively. The AIS group underwent end vertebra (EV) or EV+1 fusion. The NF-1 group underwent EV+1, 2, or 3 fusion. Both coronal and sagittal Cobb angles, trunk balance, operative time, blood loss, fusion levels, length of stay, and scores on the SRS-22 questionnaire were compared between the two groups. The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81401760). There were no study-specific conflict of interest-associated biases. RESULTS: The preoperative main curve magnitude was similar between the two groups; however, the flexibility of the NF-1 group tended to be less than that of the AIS group. The rate of correction of the main curve obtained surgically (79.8% compared with 81.1%) was similar in the NF-1 and AIS groups. There were no significant differences in the loss of correction between the two groups (p>.05). Also, there were no significant differences between the groups in operative time, blood loss, fusion levels, screw number, length of stay, trunk balance, and scores on the SRS-22. There were no serious complications related to surgery in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences in preoperative flexibilities and fusion strategies, non-dystrophic scoliosis in NF-1 can be treated with a satisfied correction rate and progression rate similar to comparable AIS by using the one-stage posterior pedicle screw technique. Dural ectasia or thin pedicles in non-dystrophic scoliosis could make pedicle screw placement challenging.