Literature DB >> 28645556

Breast cancer liver metastases in a UK tertiary centre: Outcomes following referral to tumour board meeting.

Hiba Abbas1, Simon Erridge1, Mikael H Sodergren1, Michail Papoulas1, Aamir Nawaz1, Krishna Menon1, Nigel D Heaton1, Andreas A Prachalias1, Parthi Srinivasan2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To assess the outcomes from multidisciplinary board meetings (MDM) for patients with breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) and identify prognostic factors for survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of MDM records for patients referred with BCLM to a tertiary centre between 2005 and 2016. Patient demographics, clinicopathological factors and intervention type were analysed to find predictive factors for overall survival.
RESULTS: 61 patients with BCLM were referred to the MDM. Treatment pathways included surgical resection (n = 23), radiofrequency ablation (RFA, n = 11), or chemotherapy (n = 27). Surgical resection patients had an improved median overall survival compared to chemotherapy (49 v 20mo; p < 0.001). RFA showed comparable survival benefit (37 v 20mo; p = 0.011). Resection and RFA showed no significant difference in survival over one another (49 v 37mo; p = 0.854). Survival analysis identified that resection (p = 0.002) and RFA (p = 0.001) were associated with improved overall survival compared to chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis identified extrahepatic disease (HR = 14.21; p = 0.044) and R0 resection (HR = 0.068; p = 0.023) as prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of BCLM may improve the overall survival in selected patient groups. This study identifies a cohort of patients, without extrahepatic disease and responsive to chemotherapy, who may particularly benefit from surgery. Crown
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Hepatic; Liver; Metastases; RFA; Resection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28645556     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in oligometastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Yuka Inoue; Makoto Fujishima; Makiko Ono; Jun Masuda; Yukinori Ozaki; Tetsuyo Maeda; Natsue Uehiro; Yoko Takahashi; Takayuki Kobayashi; Takehiko Sakai; Tomo Osako; Takayuki Ueno; Shinji Ohno
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  Utility of liver resection for breast cancer liver metastases, time for action.

Authors:  Karan Rangarajan; Zaed Z R Hamady
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 8.265

Review 3.  Surgical Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Takayuki Ueno
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Renewed considerations on the utility (or the futility) of hepatic resections for breast cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Gian Luca Grazi
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 8.265

5.  Incidence and prognostic factors of patients with synchronous liver metastases upon initial diagnosis of breast cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Hai-Yun Zhao; Yue Gong; Fu-Gui Ye; Hong Ling; Xin Hu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Risk and prognostic factors of breast cancer with liver metastases.

Authors:  Lei Ji; Lei Cheng; Xiuzhi Zhu; Yu Gao; Lei Fan; Zhonghua Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Prognostic Factors in Patients with Breast Cancer Liver Metastases Undergoing Liver Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Federica Galiandro; Salvatore Agnes; Giovanni Moschetta; Armando Orlandi; George Clarke; Emilio Bria; Gianluca Franceschini; Giorgio Treglia; Francesco Giovinazzo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.