| Literature DB >> 28645286 |
Raoul Orvieto1,2, Valeria Stella Vanni3,4, Norbert Gleicher5,6,7,8.
Abstract
So-called mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (mCOH) has in recent years increased in popularity, claiming to be safer and more patient-friendly, while also improving in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. We here challenge the International Society for Mild Approaches in Assisted Reproduction (ISMAAR) definition of mild stimulation, and especially address four fundamental issues, where our review found conventional COH (cCOH) advantageous over mCOH. They are: prevalence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), oocyte/embryo quality, pregnancy/live birth rates, and cost. We conclude that an objective review of the literature does not support the routine utilization of mCOH in assisted reproduction.Entities:
Keywords: Aneuploidy; Cost-effectiveness; In vitro fertilization (IVF); Live birth rates; Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS); Ovarian stimulation; Pregnancy rates
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28645286 PMCID: PMC5482955 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-017-0266-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211