| Literature DB >> 28644876 |
Song Gao1,2,3, Qiaodi Yan3, Luxi Chen3, Yaobin Song4, Junmin Li3, Chengxin Fu1, Ming Dong4.
Abstract
To reveal the effects of ploidy level and haplotype on photosynthetic traits, we chose 175 genotypes of wild strawberries belonging to two haplotypes at two types of ploidy levels (diploidy and tetraploidy) and measured photosynthetic traits. Our results revealed that ploidy significantly affected the characteristics of light-response curves, CO2-response curves, and leaf gas exchange parameters, except intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci). Tetraploid species had a lower light saturation point (LSP) and CO2 saturation point (CSP), higher light compensation point (LCP), dark respiration (Rd), and CO2 compensation point (CCP) than diploid species. Furthermore, tetraploid species have lower photosynthetic capacity than diploid species, including net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductivity (Gs), and transpiration rate (Tr). In addition, haplotype had a significant effect on LSP, CSP, Tr, and Ci as well as a significant interactive effect between ploidy and haplotype on the maximal photosynethic rate of the light-response curve and Rd. Most of the variance existed within haplotypes among individuals. These results suggest that polyploidization was the main driver for the evolution of photosynthesis with increasing ploidy level (i.e. from diploidy to tetraploidy in Fragaria species), while the origin of a chromosome could also affect the photosynthetic traits and the polyploidization effect on photosynthetic traits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28644876 PMCID: PMC5482484 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Light response curve of Fragaria plants with different ploidy levels of haplotype A (A) and haplotype B (B).
Characteristics of light-response curves of Fragaria plants with different ploidy levels and haplotypes.
The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Different lower case letters indicate significant differences between diploid and tetraploid level in the same haplotype at a p < 0.05 level.
| Haplotype | Ploidy | Light saturation point (μmol·m–2·s–1) | Light compensation point (μmol·m–2·s–1) | Apparent quantum efficiency | Dark respiration rate (μmol CO2·m–2·s–1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 | 1122±26a | 14.81±0.53a | 9.47±1.03b | 0.0377±0.0027a | 0.88±0.07b |
| A | 4 | 1048±22b | 9.70±0.25b | 13.92±1.67a | 0.0303±0.0015b | 1.04±0.05a |
| B | 2 | 1070±32a | 12.52±0.70a | 8.56±0.96b | 0.0365±0.0025a | 0.69±0.05b |
| B | 4 | 994±24b | 10.85±0.36b | 12.32±1.25a | 0.0316±0.0011b | 1.07±0.11a |
Effects of ploidy, haplotype, population (nested to haplotype), and interactive ploidy × haplotype on the characteristics of light-response curves of Fragaria.
Values in bold indicate significant effect at a p < 0.05 level.
| Factor | Light saturation point | Light compensation point | Apparent quantum yield | Dark respiration rate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | ||||||||||
| Haplotype | 4.071 | 0.074 | 3.339 | 0.101 | 2.567 | 0.144 | 3.282 | 0.103 | ||
| Ploidy × Haplotype | 0.002 | 0.967 | 0.251 | 0.628 | 0.513 | 0.492 | ||||
Fig 2CO2-response curve of Fragaria plants with different ploidy level of haplotype A (A) and haplotype B (B).
Characteristics of CO2-response curves of Fragaria with different ploidy levels in haplotype A and haplotype B.
Different lower case letters indicate significant differences between diploid and tetraploid level in the same haplotype at a p < 0.05 level.
| Haplotype | Ploidy | CO2 saturation point (μmol·mol–1) | CO2 compensation point (μmol·mol–1) | Apparent carboxylation efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 | 2253±114a | 64.63±5.95b | 27.04±1.95a | 0.0522±0.0039a |
| A | 4 | 1799±78b | 78.12±6.92a | 23.23±1.62b | 0.0371±0.0031b |
| B | 2 | 2015±99a | 69.30±6.05b | 25.96±0.70a | 0.0503±0.0023a |
| B | 4 | 1738±84b | 76.75±8.67a | 22.52±0.74b | 0.0361±0.0034b |
Effects of ploidy, haplotype, population (nested to haplotype), and interactive ploidy × haplotype on the characteristics of CO2-response curves of Fragaria.
Values in bold indicate significant effect at a p < 0.05 level.
| Factor | CO2 saturation point | CO2 compensation point | Apparent carboxylation efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | 3.812 | 0.083 | ||||||
| Haplotype | 0.095 | 0.765 | 0.807 | 0.392 | 0.073 | 0.794 | ||
| Ploidy × Haplotype | 2.806 | 0.128 | 0.318 | 0.587 | 0.001 | 0.979 | 0.000 | 0.986 |
Fig 3Net photosynthetic rate (A), transpiration rate (B), stomatal conductance (C), and intercellular CO2 concentration (D) of Fragaria plants with different ploidy levels and haplotypes.
Two-way ANOVA analysis of ploidy, haplotype, and interactive ploidy and haplotype on the photosynthetic characteristics of Fragaria.
Values in bold indicate significant effect at a p < 0.05 level.
| Factor | Net photosynthetic rate | Transpiration rate | Stomatal conductance | Intercellular CO2 concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | 0.241 | 0.624 | ||||||
| Haplotype | 0.959 | 0.329 | ||||||
| Ploidy × Haplotype | 0.102 | 0.750 | 0.354 | 0.553 | 0.058 | 0.811 | 0.046 | 0.830 |
Components of the variance of photosynthetic characteristics of Fragaria plants among ploidy levels (species), among haplotypes and within haplotypes.
| Net photosynthetic rate | Transpiration rate | Stomatal conductance | Intercellular CO2 concentration | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among ploidy levels | 6.0% | 9.0% | 8.0% | 0.0% |
| Among haplotypes | 1.0% | 6.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Within haplotypes | 93.0% | 85.0% | 89.0% | 97.0% |