Literature DB >> 28643155

Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways.

Yana Weinstein1.   

Abstract

In the past decade, a new field has formed to investigate the concept of mind-wandering, or task-unrelated thought. The state of mind-wandering is typically contrasted with being on-task, or paying attention to the task at hand, and is related to decrements in performance on cognitive tasks. The most widely used method for collecting mind-wandering data-the probe-caught method-involves stopping participants during a task and asking them where their attention is directed. In this review, 145 studies from 105 articles published between 2005 and 2015 were classified according to the framing and wording of the thought probe and response options. Five distinct methodologies were identified: neutral (in which counterbalancing was used to equally emphasize on-task and off-task states), dichotomous (say "yes" or "no" to one thought state), dichotomous (choose between two thought states), categorical, and scale. The review identifies at least 69 different methodological variants, catalogues the verbatim probes and response options used in each study, and suggests important considerations for future empirical work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Daydreaming; Framing; Mind wandering; Task-unrelated thoughts

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28643155     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  26 in total

1.  Spontaneous future cognition: the past, present and future of an emerging topic.

Authors:  Scott Cole; Lia Kvavilashvili
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-11

2.  The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Schubert; Gidon T Frischkorn; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-02

3.  Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Yana Weinstein; Henry J De Lima; Tim van der Zee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

4.  Task-related thought and metacognitive ability in mind wandering reports: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Toshikazu Kawagoe; Takayoshi Kase
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-22

5.  Captivated by thought: "Sticky" thinking leaves traces of perceptual decoupling in task-evoked pupil size.

Authors:  Stefan Huijser; Mathanja Verkaik; Marieke K van Vugt; Niels A Taatgen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A "Goldilocks zone" for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement.

Authors:  Matthew S Welhaf; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-05

7.  The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

8.  Do your eyes give you away? A validation study of eye-movement measures used as indicators for mindless reading.

Authors:  Lena Steindorf; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

9.  A mind-wandering account of the testing effect: Does context variation matter?

Authors:  Sarah Shi Hui Wong; Stephen Wee Hun Lim
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-08-13

10.  Detection of mind wandering using EEG: Within and across individuals.

Authors:  Henry W Dong; Caitlin Mills; Robert T Knight; Julia W Y Kam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.