Literature DB >> 28643013

Preoperative Measurement of the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Patient Survival in Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to Nephrectomy.

Takuya Tsujino1, Kazumasa Komura2,3, Tomohisa Matsunaga1, Yuki Yoshikawa1, Tomoaki Takai1, Taizo Uchimoto1, Kenkichi Saito1, Naoki Tanda1, Rintaro Oide4, Koichiro Minami1, Hirofumi Uehara1, Seong Ho Jeong5, Kohei Taniguchi6, Hajime Hirano1, Hayahito Nomi1, Naokazu Ibuki1, Kiyoshi Takahara1, Teruo Inamoto1, Haruhito Azuma1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) by measurement of serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels has been shown to provide prognostic value in various cancer types. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative assessment of the mGPS predicts patient survival outcome in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological and follow-up data in 219 RCC patients, all of whom underwent curative or non-curative nephrectomy, were collected. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after nephrectomy were evaluated, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the predictive value of the variables, including the mGPS.
RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 57 months, 53 patients (24.2%) were deceased within 22 months of the median OS. The 5-year OS rate from nephrectomy was 85.9 and 18.8% in non-metastatic (n = 195) and metastatic (n = 24) patients, respectively. Increasing mGPS was associated with shorter OS in non-metastatic patients (2-year OS rate of 98.2% in mGPS0, 73.3% in mGPS1, and 44.4% in mGPS2; hazard ratio [HR] 9.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.88-20.13, p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference in OS according to the mGPS was seen in metastatic patients (HR 2.01, 95% CI 0.79-5.16, p = 0.137). On multivariate analysis, the mGPS remained as an independent predictor for OS (HR 5.24, 95% CI 1.39-19.77, p = 0.015) and CSS (HR 4.69, 95% CI 1.13-20.96, p = 0.034) in non-metastatic RCC patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The mGPS appeared to be a reliable, preoperatively defined predictive marker with widely standardized protocol in non-metastatic RCC, and should therefore be considered in treatment decision making for RCC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28643013     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-5948-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Guilherme Nader Marta; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Renata R C Bonadio; Mirella Nardo; Sheila F Faraj; Manoel Carlos L de Azevedo Souza; David Q B Muniz; Diogo Assed Bastos; Carlos Dzik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Pre-treatment Glasgow prognostic score and modified Glasgow prognostic score may be potential prognostic biomarkers in urological cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Qi; Yunqiu Xu; Yuxiao Zheng; Xiao Li; Yang Gao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

3.  Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score is predictive of prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Hotaka Nonaka; Hiroshi Onishi; Eiji Nakatani; Yoko Sato; Satoshi Funayama; Hiroaki Watanabe; Takafumi Komiyama; Kengo Kuriyama; Kan Marino; Shinichi Aoki; Masayuki Araya; Licht Tominaga; Ryo Saito; Yoshiyasu Maehata; Mitsuhiko Oguri; Masahide Saito
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  The combination of preoperative platelet count and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in localized renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Takuya Tsujino; Kazumasa Komura; Atsushi Ichihashi; Takeshi Tsutsumi; Tomohisa Matsunaga; Yuki Yoshikawa; Ryoichi Maenosono; Kyohei Okita; Tomoaki Takai; Rintaro Oide; Koichiro Minami; Hirofumi Uehara; Kohei Taniguchi; Hajime Hirano; Hayahito Nomi; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyoshi Takahara; Teruo Inamoto; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-25

5.  Modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Hu; Yan Wang; Wei-Xiao Yang; Wei-Chao Dou; Yan-Xiang Shao; Xiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Distinct effect of body mass index by sex as a prognostic factor in localized renal cell carcinoma treated with nephrectomy ~ data from a multi-institutional study in Japan ~.

Authors:  Takeshi Tsutsumi; Kazumasa Komura; Takeshi Hashimoto; Ryu Muraoka; Naoya Satake; Tomohisa Matsunaga; Takuya Tsujino; Yuki Yoshikawa; Tomoaki Takai; Koichiro Minami; Kohei Taniguchi; Tomohito Tanaka; Hirofumi Uehara; Hajime Hirano; Hayahito Nomi; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyoshi Takahara; Teruo Inamoto; Yoshio Ohno; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Prognostic Value of Preoperative Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Ming Zhao; Mingxin Zhang; Yonghua Wang; Xuecheng Yang; Xue Teng; Guangdi Chu; Xinsheng Wang; Haitao Niu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Elevated Plasma Interleukin-35 as a Prognostic Indicator in Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Xiaojian Xu; Zongxin Chen; Zhengyu Zhu; Jianquan Hou
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Added Value of Systemic Inflammation Markers in Predicting Clinical Stage T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Pathologically Upstaged to T3a.

Authors:  Hailang Liu; Zhixian Wang; Ejun Peng; Zhiqiang Chen; Kun Tang; Ding Xia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  The prognostic value of preoperative controlling nutritional status score in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with surgery: a retrospective single-institution study.

Authors:  Haifeng Song; Ben Xu; Cheng Luo; Zhenan Zhang; Binglei Ma; Jie Jin; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.