| Literature DB >> 28642608 |
S Vizzini1,2, B Martínez-Crego3, C Andolina4,5, A Massa-Gallucci6, S D Connell7, M C Gambi6.
Abstract
Increasing oceanic uptake of CO2 is predicted to drive ecological change as both a resource (i.e. CO2 enrichment on primary producers) and stressor (i.e. lower pH on consumers). We use the natural ecological complexity of a CO2 vent (i.e. a seagrass system) to assess the potential validity of conceptual models developed from laboratory and mesocosm research. Our observations suggest that the stressor-effect of CO2 enrichment combined with its resource-effect drives simplified food web structure of lower trophic diversity and shorter length. The transfer of CO2 enrichment from plants to herbivores through consumption (apparent resource-effect) was not compensated by predation, because carnivores failed to contain herbivore outbreaks. Instead, these higher-order consumers collapsed (apparent stressor-effect on carnivores) suggesting limited trophic propagation to predator populations. The dominance of primary producers and their lower-order consumers along with the loss of carnivores reflects the duality of intensifying ocean acidification acting both as resource-effect (i.e. bottom-up control) and stressor-effect (i.e. top-down control) to simplify community and trophic structure and function. This shifting balance between the propagation of resource enrichment and its consumption across trophic levels provides new insights into how the trophic dynamics might stabilize against or propagate future environmental change.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28642608 PMCID: PMC5481442 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03802-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Chemical features indicative of the nutritional quality of food sources present in both control (black) and CO2-enriched (grey) sites. C/N ratio, N (%), phenolics (mg g−1), soluble sugars (mg g−1), starch (mg g−1) and fibre (%) content of (a) Cymodocea nodosa, (b) Cystoseira compressa, (c) sedimentary organic matter – SOM, and (d) epiphytes. All bars indicate standard deviation. — indicates data not available. Asterisks indicate t-test’s p-value < 0.05.
Figure 2Abundance of the motile invertebrate taxa and trophic groups at the control (black) and CO2-enriched (grey) sites. Density (n° individuals m−2; mean ± standard error) of (a) main taxa and (b) trophic group of the motile invertebrate community.
Figure 3Isotopic signatures at the control (black) and CO2-enriched (grey) sites. (a) δ13C vs. δ15N (‰, mean ± standard deviation) of each organic matter source (POM: particulate organic matter, SOM: sedimentary organic matter) and consumers (assigned to trophic groups). (b) δ13C vs. δ15N (single replicates) of consumers: solid lines enclose the standard ellipse areas (SEAc).
Figure 4Trophic position (± standard deviation) of motile invertebrates associated with macrophytes at the control (black) and CO2-enriched (grey) sites.