Literature DB >> 28642165

Can the way pigs are handled alter behavioural and physiological measures of affective state?

Ricard Carreras1, Laura Arroyo2, Eva Mainau3, Daniel Valent2, Anna Bassols2, Antoni Dalmau1, Luigi Faucitano4, Xavier Manteca5, Antonio Velarde6.   

Abstract

Research on human-animal relationship in animal production has been mainly focused on its effect on stress, productivity and meat quality. Only few studies have assessed its effects on the animals' affective state. In the present study, the influence of positive and negative handling (pH and NH, respectively) on affective state and fear as assessed by the cognitive bias test, the novel object test and the defence cascade test was studied in 56 pigs. Serum, saliva and hair were sampled during the study for the analysis of cortisol concentration. Results showed no differences between pH and NH pigs in the behavioural tests, which may be either due to the lack of previous handling effect on the test results, the lack of validity or the low sensitivity of these tests or a combination of them. Moreover, no differences were found in cortisol concentrations between handling groups. However, correlations between tests were found (p<0.05) suggesting that there are individual factors such as the fear level, the motivation or the coping style, that have a similar effect on the response to these tests. Moreover, pigs who were more fearful had higher (r=0.37; p=0.014) levels of serum cortisol at slaughter.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective state; Cognitive bias; Cortisol; Fear; Handling; Pigs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28642165     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  4 in total

1.  Investigation of influence of growing pigs' positive affective state on behavioral and physiological parameters using structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Katja L Krugmann; Farina J Mieloch; Joachim Krieter; Irena Czycholl
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Temperament, Plasticity, and Emotions in Defensive Behaviour of Paca (Mammalia, Hystricognatha).

Authors:  Selene S C Nogueira; Sérgio L G Nogueira-Filho; José M B Duarte; Michael Mendl
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Like Mother Like Child: Do Fearful Sows Have Fearful Piglets?

Authors:  Hazel B Rooney; Oceane Schmitt; Alexandra Courty; Peadar G Lawlor; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Quantifying defence cascade responses as indicators of pig affect and welfare using computer vision methods.

Authors:  Poppy Statham; Sion Hannuna; Samantha Jones; Neill Campbell; G Robert Colborne; William J Browne; Elizabeth S Paul; Michael Mendl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.