Literature DB >> 28642157

Genome comparisons of two Taiwanese community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST59 clones support the multi-origin theory of CA-MRSA.

Ye Feng1, Hsiu-Ling Chen2, Chih-Jung Chen3, Chyi-Liang Chen2, Cheng-Hsun Chiu4.   

Abstract

Sequence type (ST) 59 is an epidemic lineage of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) in Asia. Two ST59 clones are prevalent in Taiwan: the Taiwan clone (TW) causes severe infections, whereas the Asian-Pacific clone (AP) is usually commensal. In this study, we sequenced the genome and transcriptome of the representative strains of these two clones and found their differences to focus on three mobile genetic elements: TW carries SCCmec Type VT, Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL)-encoding prophage ΦSa2, whereas AP carries SCCmec Type IV and staphylokinase (SAK)-encoding prophage ΦSa3. The anti-virulent role of SAK was confirmed using murine skin and bloodstream infection models. ΦSa3 usually integrates into the hlb gene, but in AP was found to be integrated at the genomic island νSaβ. The mutation of the attB site "TGTATCCAAACTGG" to "TGTATCCGAATTGG" led to a failure in the integration of ΦSa3 in hlb, prompting atypical integration at other sites. The sak gene possessed remarkably different patterns of distribution among the different STs of S. aureus. We conclude that the atypical integration of ΦSa3 may help S. aureus adapt to the human host habitat and that the subsequent loss of ΦSa3 contributes toward the development of a virulent CA-MRSA lineage for wider horizontal transmission.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-virulence factor; Bacteriophage; CA-MRSA; Clone; Staphylokinase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28642157     DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Genet Evol        ISSN: 1567-1348            Impact factor:   3.342


  4 in total

1.  Diversity of endophytic fungi in Coptis chinensis Franch. and their activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Qianliang Ming; Xiuning Huang; Linming Guo; Dong Liu; Lingyue Qin; Yimo He; Yu Tang; Yanxia Liu; Junkang Liu; Peng Li
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  A comparative genomic analysis between methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains of hospital acquired and community infections in Yunnan province of China.

Authors:  Feng Liao; Zhishuo Mo; Wenpeng Gu; Wen Xu; Xiaoqing Fu; Yunhui Zhang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  The clinical significance of silent mutations with respect to ciprofloxacin resistance in MRSA.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Lai; Chi-Chung Chen; Ying-Chen Lu; Yin-Ching Chuang; Hung-Jen Tang
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chun-Ya Kang; Eugene Yu-Chuan Kang; Chi-Chun Lai; Wei-Che Lo; Kun-Jen Chen; Wei-Chi Wu; Laura Liu; Yih-Shiou Hwang; Fu-Sung Lo; Yhu-Chering Huang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.