Sayeh Nikpay1, Seth Freedman2, Helen Levy3, Tom Buchmueller4. 1. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: sayeh.s.nikpay@vanderbilt.edu. 2. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. 3. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess whether the expansion of Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) results in changes in emergency department (ED) visits or ED payer mix. We also test whether the size of the change in ED visits depends on the change in the size of the Medicaid population. METHODS: Using all-capture, longitudinal, state data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Fast Stats program, we implemented a difference-in-difference analysis, which compared changes in ED visits per capita and the share of ED visits by payer (Medicaid, uninsured, and private insurance) in 14 states that did and 11 states that did not expand Medicaid in 2014. Analyses controlled for state-level demographic and economic characteristics. RESULTS: We found that total ED use per 1,000 population increased by 2.5 visits more in Medicaid expansion states than in nonexpansion states after 2014 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 3.9). Among the visit types that could be measured, increases in ED visits were largest for injury-related visits and for states with the largest changes in Medicaid enrollment. Compared with nonexpansion states, in expansion states the share of ED visits covered by Medicaid increased 8.8 percentage points (95% CI 5.0 to 12.6), whereas the uninsured share decreased by 5.3 percentage points (95% CI -1.7 to -8.9). CONCLUSION: The ACA's Medicaid expansion has resulted in changes in payer mix. Contrary to other studies of the ACA's effect on ED visits, our study found that the expansion also increased use of the ED, consistent with polls of emergency physicians.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess whether the expansion of Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) results in changes in emergency department (ED) visits or ED payer mix. We also test whether the size of the change in ED visits depends on the change in the size of the Medicaid population. METHODS: Using all-capture, longitudinal, state data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Fast Stats program, we implemented a difference-in-difference analysis, which compared changes in ED visits per capita and the share of ED visits by payer (Medicaid, uninsured, and private insurance) in 14 states that did and 11 states that did not expand Medicaid in 2014. Analyses controlled for state-level demographic and economic characteristics. RESULTS: We found that total ED use per 1,000 population increased by 2.5 visits more in Medicaid expansion states than in nonexpansion states after 2014 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 3.9). Among the visit types that could be measured, increases in ED visits were largest for injury-related visits and for states with the largest changes in Medicaid enrollment. Compared with nonexpansion states, in expansion states the share of ED visits covered by Medicaid increased 8.8 percentage points (95% CI 5.0 to 12.6), whereas the uninsured share decreased by 5.3 percentage points (95% CI -1.7 to -8.9). CONCLUSION: The ACA's Medicaid expansion has resulted in changes in payer mix. Contrary to other studies of the ACA's effect on ED visits, our study found that the expansion also increased use of the ED, consistent with polls of emergency physicians.
Authors: Elliott Brannon; Tianshi Wang; Jeremy Lapedis; Paul Valenstein; Michael Klinkman; Ellen Bunting; Alice Stanulis; Karandeep Singh Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Charleen Hsuan; Renee Y Hsia; Jill R Horwitz; Ninez A Ponce; Thomas Rice; Jack Needleman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Gary Pickens; Zeynal Karaca; Teresa B Gibson; Eli Cutler; Michael Dworsky; Brian Moore; Herbert S Wong Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Cheryl K Zogg; John W Scott; David Metcalfe; Abbe R Gluck; Gregory D Curfman; Kimberly A Davis; Justin B Dimick; Adil H Haider Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Nancy Crego; Christian Douglas; Emily Bonnabeau; Marian Earls; Kern Eason; Elizabeth Merwin; Gary Rains; Paula Tanabe; Nirmish Shah Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2020 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Monika K Goyal; Troy Richardson; Abbey Masonbrink; Jennifer L Reed; Elizabeth R Alpern; Matt Hall; Mark I Neuman Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 1.454