Literature DB >> 28641555

Supervised Machine Learning Methods Applied to Predict Ligand- Binding Affinity.

Gabriela S Heck1, Val O Pintro1, Richard R Pereira1, Mauricio B de Ávila1, Nayara M B Levin1, Walter F de Azevedo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calculation of ligand-binding affinity is an open problem in computational medicinal chemistry. The ability to computationally predict affinities has a beneficial impact in the early stages of drug development, since it allows a mathematical model to assess protein-ligand interactions. Due to the availability of structural and binding information, machine learning methods have been applied to generate scoring functions with good predictive power.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal here is to review recent developments in the application of machine learning methods to predict ligand-binding affinity.
METHOD: We focus our review on the application of computational methods to predict binding affinity for protein targets. In addition, we also describe the major available databases for experimental binding constants and protein structures. Furthermore, we explain the most successful methods to evaluate the predictive power of scoring functions.
RESULTS: Association of structural information with ligand-binding affinity makes it possible to generate scoring functions targeted to a specific biological system. Through regression analysis, this data can be used as a base to generate mathematical models to predict ligandbinding affinities, such as inhibition constant, dissociation constant and binding energy.
CONCLUSION: Experimental biophysical techniques were able to determine the structures of over 120,000 macromolecules. Considering also the evolution of binding affinity information, we may say that we have a promising scenario for development of scoring functions, making use of machine learning techniques. Recent developments in this area indicate that building scoring functions targeted to the biological systems of interest shows superior predictive performance, when compared with other approaches. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.

Keywords:  Machine learning; binding affinity; drug; enzyme; ligand-bindingzzm321990affinity; medicinal chemistry; regression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28641555     DOI: 10.2174/0929867324666170623092503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  3 in total

1.  Density functional theory for the thermodynamic gas-phase investigation of butanol biofuel and its isomers mixed with gasoline and ethanol.

Authors:  Marcelo Gonçalves Martins; Tiago da Silva Arouche; Abel Ferreira Gomes Neto; Jorddy Neves da Cruz; Fabio Luiz Paranhos da Costa; Lindemberg Lima Fernandes; Raul Nunes de Carvalho Junior; José Francisco da Silva Costa; Antonio Maia de Jesus Chaves Neto
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Molecular function recognition by supervised projection pursuit machine learning.

Authors:  Tyler Grear; Chris Avery; John Patterson; Donald J Jacobs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  On the Unfounded Enthusiasm for Soft Selective Sweeps III: The Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm That Isn't.

Authors:  Eran Elhaik; Dan Graur
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.