Literature DB >> 28640321

Effects of direct oral anticoagulants on lupus anticoagulant assays in a real-life setting.

Aleksandra Antovic1, Eva-Marie Norberg, Maria Berndtsson, Agnes Rasmuson, Rickard E Malmström, Mika Skeppholm, Jovan Antovic.   

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulant (LA) is based on prolongation in at least one coagulation assay (diluted Russell's viper venom time - dRVVT or activated partial thromboplastin time - aPTT), which normalises after addition of phospholipids. Both assays may be influenced by anticoagulants and therefore LA should not be tested during warfarin or heparin treatment. It has been shown (primarily in vitro) that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs - dabigatran [DAB], rivaroxaban [RIV] and apixaban [API]) may also influence LA testing. We tested the effects of DOACs on assays routinely used for the diagnosis of LA in patients treated with these drugs in a real-life setting. Plasma from patients with atrial fibrillation treated with DAB (n=30), RIV (n=20) and API (n=17) and not known to have LA were tested using dRVVT (LA-screen and LA-confirm, Life Diagnostics) and aPTT (PTT-LA, Diagnostica Stago and aPTT Actin FS, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) assays. According to the diagnostics algorithm, dRVVT and aPTT ratios of <1.2 were considered negative, ratios of >1.4 positive, while if the ratios were 1.2-1.4 LA could not be ruled out. Plasma concentrations varied between 8-172 µg/l for DAB, 8-437 µg/l for RIV and 36-178 µg/l for API. LA diagnosis was negative in only eight (27 %) plasma samples from patients treated with DAB, and in five (25 %) and four samples (24 %) from patients treated with RIV and API, respectively. LA Positivity (dRVVT and aPTT ratios >1.4) was found in 5 cases (17 %) among patients treated with DAB, in 10 cases (50 %) treated with RIV and in 7 cases (41 %) treated with API. A concentration-dependent effect of DOACs on dRVVT-based parameters was observed, particularly as regards DAB. At lower concentrations, RIV and API had only minor effects on the confirmatory tests (below 100 µg/l and 70 µg/l, respectively). Our results suggest that a risk of overestimation of LA detection is present in samples from patients treated with DOACs. Therefore, LA testing should not be performed during treatment with DOACs. Prolongation in confirmatory assays may be helpful for the recognition of false positivity, especially as regards DAB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct oral anticoagulants; laboratory assays; lupus anticoagulant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28640321     DOI: 10.1160/TH17-03-0204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  8 in total

1.  Improvements in diagnosis and risk assessment of primary and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Michelle Petri
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 2.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances.

Authors:  Arne Vandevelde; Katrien M J Devreese
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Associations with thrombosis are stronger for antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies than for the Sydney criteria antiphospholipid antibody tests in SLE.

Authors:  Sahwa Elbagir; Giorgia Grosso; NasrEldeen A Mohammed; Amir I Elshafie; Elnour M Elagib; Agneta Zickert; Vivek Anand Manivel; Eleftheria Pertsinidou; Musa A M Nur; Iva Gunnarsson; Johan Rönnelid; Elisabet Svenungsson
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.911

4.  Reliability of Lupus Anticoagulant and Anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin Autoantibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Savino Sciascia; Massimo Radin; Irene Cecchi; Elena Rubini; Anna Scotta; Roberta Rolla; Barbara Montaruli; Patrizia Pergolini; Giulio Mengozzi; Emanuela Muccini; Simone Baldovino; Michela Ferro; Antonella Vaccarino; Michael Mahler; Elisa Menegatti; Dario Roccatello
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Anti-Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin Antibodies at Two Points: Correlation With Lupus Anticoagulant and Thrombotic Risk.

Authors:  Natalia Egri; Chelsea Bentow; Laura Rubio; Gary L Norman; Susana López-Sañudo; Michael Mahler; Albert Pérez-Isidro; Ricard Cervera; Odette Viñas; Gerard Espinosa; Estíbaliz Ruiz-Ortiz
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Direct Oral Anticoagulant removal by a DOAC filter: Impact on lupus anticoagulant testing - Evaluation on spiked and patient samples.

Authors:  Eleni A Linskens; Pieter De Kesel; Katrien M J Devreese
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 7.  Escaping the catch 22 of lupus anticoagulant testing.

Authors:  Pernille Just Vinholt; Søren Andreas Just
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-01

8.  Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test-specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant.

Authors:  Osamu Kumano; Gary W Moore
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-07-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.