Literature DB >> 28639521

Technology-enhanced focus groups as a component of instrument development.

Tania D Strout1, Rachel L DiFazio2, Judith A Vessey3.   

Abstract

Background Bullying is a critical public health problem and a screening tool for use in healthcare is needed. Focus groups are a common tool for generating qualitative data when developing an instrument and evidence suggests that technology-enhanced focus groups can be effective in simultaneously engaging participants from diverse settings. Aim To examine the use of technology-enhanced focus groups in generating an item pool to develop a youth-bullying screening tool. Discussion The authors explore methodological and ethical issues related to conducting technology-enhanced focus groups, drawing on their experience in developing a youth-bullying measure. They conducted qualitative focus groups with professionals from the front lines of bullying response and intervention. They describe the experience of conducting technology-enhanced focus group sessions, focusing on the methodological and ethical issues that researchers engaging in similar work may encounter. Challenges associated with this methodology include establishing rapport among participants, privacy concerns and limited non-verbal communication. Conclusion The use of technology-enhanced focus groups can be valuable in obtaining rich data from a wide variety of disciplines and contexts. Organising these focus groups was inexpensive and preferred by the study's participants. Implications for practice Researchers should consider using technology-enhanced focus groups to generate data to develop health-related measurement tools.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; bullying; focus group; nursing research; paediatrics; qualitative research; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28639521      PMCID: PMC5822428          DOI: 10.7748/nr.2017.e1458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Res        ISSN: 1351-5578


  15 in total

1.  Focus group interview: a research technique for informed nursing practice.

Authors:  A Nyamathi; P Shuler
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  The use of focus group methodology in health disparities research.

Authors:  Coralease C Ruff; Ivy M Alexander; Charmaine McKie
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Email-facilitated qualitative interviews with traumatic brain injury survivors: a new and accessible method.

Authors:  Jennifer Egan; Lesley Chenoweth; Donna McAuliffe
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Telephone focus groups in physiotherapy research: potential uses and recommendations.

Authors:  Joanna M Smith; S John Sullivan; G David Baxter
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics.

Authors:  Meredith Mealer; Jacqueline Jones Rn
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2014-03

6.  Interaction in cyberspace: an online focus group.

Authors:  Amanda J Kenny
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 7.  Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Adapting qualitative research strategies to technology savvy adolescents.

Authors:  Deanna Marie Mason; Bette Ide
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2014-05

9.  Exchange and equality during data collection: relationships through story sharing with lesbian mothers.

Authors:  Brenda Hayman; Lesley Wilkes; Debra Jackson; Elizabeth Halcomb
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2012

10.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology.

Authors:  Kiek Tates; Marieke Zwaanswijk; Roel Otten; Sandra van Dulmen; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Willem A Kamps; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Item Generation and Content Validity of the Child-Adolescent Bullying Scale.

Authors:  Rachel L Difazio; Tania D Strout; Judith A Vessey; Amanda Lulloff
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Item Generation in the Development of an Interactive Nutrition Specific Physical Exam Competency Tool (INSPECT): A Qualitative Study Utilizing Technology-Based Focus Groups in the United States.

Authors:  Sunitha Zechariah; Leigh Lehman; Jennifer L Waller; Gianluca De Leo; Judith Stallings; Ashley J Gess
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.