Literature DB >> 28638944

The effect of fight cost structure on fighting behaviour involving simultaneous decisions and variable investment levels.

Mark Broom1, Michal Johanis2, Jan Rychtář3.   

Abstract

In the "producer-scrounger" model, a producer discovers a resource and is in turn discovered by a second individual, the scrounger, who attempts to steal it. This resource can be food or a territory, and in some situations, potentially divisible. In a previous paper we considered a producer and scrounger competing for an indivisible resource, where each individual could choose the level of energy that they would invest in the contest. The higher the investment, the higher the probability of success, but also the higher the costs incurred in the contest. In that paper decisions were sequential with the scrounger choosing their strategy before the producer. In this paper we consider a version of the game where decisions are made simultaneously. For the same cost functions as before, we analyse this case in detail, and then make comparisons between the two cases. Finally we discuss some real examples with potentially variable and asymmetric energetic investments, including intraspecific contests amongst spiders and amongst parasitoid wasps. In the case of the spiders, detailed estimates of energetic expenditure are available which demonstrate the asymmetric values assumed in our models. For the wasps the value of the resource can affect the probabilities of success of the defender and attacker, and differential energetic investment can be inferred. In general for real populations energy usage varies markedly depending upon crucial parameters extrinsic to the individual such as resource value and intrinsic ones such as age, and is thus an important factor to consider when modelling.

Keywords:  Food stealing; Game theory; Kleptoparasitism; Producer–scrounger; Simultaneous decisions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28638944     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-017-1149-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  8 in total

1.  Kleptoparasitic melees--modelling food stealing featuring contests with multiple individuals.

Authors:  M Broom; J Rychtář
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 1.758

2.  Resistance is useless?--Extensions to the game theory of kleptoparasitism.

Authors:  Mark Broom; Roger M Luther; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  The evolution of a kleptoparasitic system under adaptive dynamics.

Authors:  M Broom; J Rychtár
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  A game-theoretic model of kleptoparasitic behavior in polymorphic populations.

Authors:  Mark Broom; Roger M Luther; Graeme D Ruxton; Jan Rychtár
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Extrinsic effects, estimating opponents' RHP, and the structure of dominance hierarchies.

Authors:  Lee Alan Dugatkin; Aaron David Dugatkin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The effect of fight cost structure on fighting behaviour.

Authors:  Mark Broom; Michal Johanis; Jan Rychtář
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Modelling Dominance Hierarchies Under Winner and Loser Effects.

Authors:  Klodeta Kura; Mark Broom; Anne Kandler
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetric animal conflicts.

Authors:  R Selten
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1980-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.