Literature DB >> 28638938

[Geriatric case management at the kitchen table : Patient outcome of the pilot project for a regional geriatric care concept in the District of Lippe].

Charlotte Şahin1, Anja Rethmeier-Hanke2, Olaf Iseringhausen3, Constanze Liebe4, Bernd Wedmann2, Kira Hower5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interdisciplinary healthcare treatment of the elderly needs to consider their complex needs. There is a need for new structures of care to be tested, as in the model project regional geriatric care (RVG) concept. The aim is to qualitatively improve the treatment of elderly, multimorbid people by the implementation of case management and therefore to promote living in their own home and avoidance of the necessity for care.
OBJECTIVE: How can the quality of care of a geriatric care concept be measured and the benefits for the target group be evaluated?
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The explorative evaluation study reports patient outcomes for n = 380 participants who underwent geriatric assessment at the beginning of the intervention and again 12 months later. Descriptive and bivariate data analyses are reported.
RESULTS: Participants of the RVG often had a greater need of support because of functional limitations. They rated their physical abilities, limitations and health mostly as being stable. The subjective mental well-being was significantly improved and satisfaction and acceptance by participants and their family members was high.
CONCLUSION: The RVG care model enables a qualitatively improved geriatric care in the District of Lippe and considers the high potential for prevention. For organizing care and supporting independent living at home, it is more important to focus on the functional limitations of the elderly than on individual diseases. The tested concept for evaluation has limitations but serves as a basis for future clinical studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case management; Conservation of independent living at home; Evaluation; Geriatric care network; Health services research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28638938     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-017-1264-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  8 in total

1.  [Geriatric assessment. The status of current knowledge with reference to suitability criteria (discrimination, prediction, evaluation, practical aspects)].

Authors:  T Nikolaus
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  [The Barthel Index in geriatrics. A context analysis for the Hamburg Classification Manual].

Authors:  Norbert Lübke; Matthias Meinck; Wolfgang Von Renteln-Kruse
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 3.  [Geriatric assessment. Development, status quo and perspectives].

Authors:  D Lüttje; D Varwig; B Teigel; B Gilhaus
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  A simple procedure for general screening for functional disability in elderly patients.

Authors:  M S Lachs; A R Feinstein; L M Cooney; M A Drickamer; R A Marottoli; F C Pannill; M E Tinetti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.

Authors:  M P Lawton; E M Brody
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1969

Review 6.  Reliability of the Barthel Index when used with older people.

Authors:  Anita Sainsbury; Gudrun Seebass; Aruna Bansal; John B Young
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  [Diagnostic and treatment goals in elderly patients].

Authors:  A H Leischker; G F Kolb
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Effect of health risk assessment and counselling on health behaviour and survival in older people: a pragmatic randomised trial.

Authors:  Andreas E Stuck; André Moser; Ueli Morf; Urban Wirz; Joseph Wyser; Gerhard Gillmann; Stephan Born; Marcel Zwahlen; Steve Iliffe; Danielle Harari; Cameron Swift; John C Beck; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 11.069

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.