R Rotter1, P Gierer2. 1. Abteilung für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland. robert.rotter@med.uni-rostock.de. 2. Abteilung für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The anatomical reconstruction of tibial pilon fractures is a major challenge with respect to preoperative planning, time management and the intraoperative procedure. OBJECTIVE: Presentation of the various surgical procedures available and the clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The established open reduction and internal plate fixation procedures form the basis for new minimally invasive treatment concepts. The current results of comparative studies and basic literature are discussed. RESULTS: The treatment result depends on the severity of the initial fracture and accompanying soft tissue damage. Essential is an anatomical reduction with an articular displacement of less than 2 mm. Overall, only approximately half of all patients return to work within 1 year. The fixation procedure used is not relevant for this purpose. Both plate fixation and the combination of external fixator plus minimally invasive articular reconstruction with and without arthroscopy achieve equivalent results. CONCLUSION: Good clinical results can be achieved by an accurate preoperative planning with respect to the surgical procedure, time of surgery and the surgical steps. In cases of disregarding these points and inadequate surgical expertise, loss of function and reduced quality of life are impending.
BACKGROUND: The anatomical reconstruction of tibial pilon fractures is a major challenge with respect to preoperative planning, time management and the intraoperative procedure. OBJECTIVE: Presentation of the various surgical procedures available and the clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The established open reduction and internal plate fixation procedures form the basis for new minimally invasive treatment concepts. The current results of comparative studies and basic literature are discussed. RESULTS: The treatment result depends on the severity of the initial fracture and accompanying soft tissue damage. Essential is an anatomical reduction with an articular displacement of less than 2 mm. Overall, only approximately half of all patients return to work within 1 year. The fixation procedure used is not relevant for this purpose. Both plate fixation and the combination of external fixator plus minimally invasive articular reconstruction with and without arthroscopy achieve equivalent results. CONCLUSION: Good clinical results can be achieved by an accurate preoperative planning with respect to the surgical procedure, time of surgery and the surgical steps. In cases of disregarding these points and inadequate surgical expertise, loss of function and reduced quality of life are impending.
Authors: Justin E Richards; Mark Magill; Marc A Tressler; Franklin D Shuler; Philip J Kregor; William T Obremskey Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.390