| Literature DB >> 28638864 |
Yong Gui Wang1, Liang Bo Jiang2, Bo Gou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The need for an anti-osteoporotic agent is in high demand since osteoporosis contributes to high rates of disability or impairment (high osteoporotic fracture), morbidity and mortality. Hence, the present study is designed to evaluate the protective effects of vanillic acid (VA) against bilateral ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Inflammatory markers; Osteoporosis; Ovariectomy; Vanillic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28638864 PMCID: PMC5471479 DOI: 10.21010/ajtcam.v14i4.4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med ISSN: 2505-0044
Figure 1Effect of VA on body weight (A) and uterus index (B) of sham-operated control and experimental rats. Data were reported as means ± S.D for 10 rats in each group. **p<0.01, *p<0.05 (a) OVX group compared with the sham control group, (b) VA 50 and 100 compared with the OVX induced group.
Effect of VA in serum and urinary bone turnover markers (osteoclastic factors) of sham-operated control and experimental rats
| Parameters | Sham control | OVX | VA 50 + OVX | VA 100 + OVX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112.40±10.57 | 253.01±31.03 a | 183.95±22.50 b | 152.89±19.70 b | |
| 11.61±1.03 | 17.76±1.19 a | 14.15±1.25 b | 12.98±0.54 b | |
| 2.52±0.22 | 2.38±0.29 | 2.32±0.42 | 2.46±0.38 | |
| 2.22±0.31 | 2.08±0.18 | 2.13±0.28 | 2.25±0.33 | |
| 0.28±0.02 | 0.50±0.07 a | 0.39±0.04 b | 0.31±0.90 b | |
| 4.36±0.42 | 6.05±0.68 a | 5.21±0.51 b | 4.89±0.72 b | |
| 60.21±7.11 | 98.32±10.63 a | 76.05±8.82 b | 68.00±9.22 b |
Data were reported as means ± S.D for 10 rats in each group.
p<0.01,
p<0.05 (a) OVX group compared with the sham control group, (b) VA 50 and 100 compared with the OVX induced group.
Effect of VA on the concentration of serum inflammatory markers in sham-operated control and experimental rats
| Parameters | Sham control | OVX | VA 50 + OVX | VA 100 + OVX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.45±11.38 | 21.01±25.40 a | 16.83±14.92 b | 14.78±10.57 b | |
| 68.59±9.04 | 97.59±12.10 a | 84.82±11.25 b | 73.92±8.83 b | |
| 96.31±11.62 | 169.11±21.23 a | 131.58±14.11 b | 110.46±18.29 b |
Data were reported as means ± S.D for 10 rats in each group.
p<0.01,
p<0.05 (a) OVX group compared with the sham control group, (b) VA 50 and 100 compared with the OVX induced group.
Figure 2Effect of VA on the bone mineral content (BMC; A) and bone mineral density (BMD; B) in the femur of sham-operated control and experimental rats. Data were reported as means ± S.D for 10 rats in each group. **p<0.01, *p<0.05 (a) OVX group compared with the sham control group, (b) VA 50 and 100 compared with the OVX induced group.
Effect of VA on biomechanical parameters (bending test) in left femur diaphysis of sham-operated control and experimental rats
| Parameters | Sham control | OVX | VA 50 + OVX | VA 100 + OVX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.89±6.57 | 42.01±7.03 a | 47.95±9.50 b | 51.06±9.70 b | |
| 118.61±10.03 | 97.76±11.19 a | 107.14±12.25 b | 113.80±10.54 b | |
| 176.02±20.22 | 158.18±14.45 a | 170.12±19.34 b | 162.06±19.38 b | |
| 6934.22±823.31 | 5124.82±735.18 a | 6002.64±834.28 b | 5545.25±656.33 b | |
| 201.28±23.02 | 155.50±18.07 a | 177.23±19.04 b | 190.31±22.90 b |
Data were reported as means ± S.D for 10 rats in each group.
p<0.01,
p<0.05 (a) OVX group compared with the sham control group, (b) VA 50 and 100 compared with the OVX induced group.