| Literature DB >> 28638616 |
Meseret Workineh1, Biniam Mathewos1, Beyene Moges1, Adissu Gize2, Sisay Getie3, Olle Stendahl4, Thomas Schon4,5, Ebba Abate1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that the incidence and severity of tuberculosis is associated with low levels of vitamin D. Even though individuals living in Ethiopia have a high exposure to sunlight which is a source of vitamin D, tuberculosis is still one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the country. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of vitamin D deficiency in newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients, household contacts and community controls in Gondar, Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; Tuberculosis; Vitamin D deficiency
Year: 2017 PMID: 28638616 PMCID: PMC5474861 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-017-0195-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants
| Variables | TB patients ( | Community controls ( |
| Household contacts ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 78 (62) | 53(76) | 0.049 | 23(40.4) | 0.006 |
| Female | 48 (38) | 17(24) | 34(59.6) | ||
| Age (years) mean(SD) | 29.8 ± 11.9 | 27.3 ± 7.6 | 0.173 | 24.3 ± 14.7 | 0.008 |
| BMI,Kg/m2 Mean(SD) | 17.4 ± 2.25 | 21.4 ± 2.84 | <0.001 | 18.9 ± 3.77 | 0.001 |
| Level of education | |||||
| Illiterate | 38(30) | 11(15.7) | 0.023 | NA | |
| Read and write | 67(53.3) | 38(54.3) | |||
| Higher education | 21(16.7) | 21(30) | |||
| Occupation | |||||
| Employed | 21(16.7) | 28(40) | <0.001 | ||
| Unemployed | 22(17.5) | 10(14.3) | NA | ||
| Daily laborer | 28(22.2) | 14(20) | |||
| Farmer | 36(28.5) | 13(18.6) | |||
| Others | 19(15.1) | 5(7.1) | |||
| Residence | |||||
| Urban | 72(57.2) | 42(60) | 0.697 | NA | |
| Rural | 54(42.8) | 28(40) | |||
| Alcohol use | |||||
| Yes | 53(42.5) | 24(35) | 0.285 | NA | |
| No | 73(57.5) | 46(65) | |||
| Smoking | |||||
| Yes | 22(17.5) | 10(14) | 0.564 | NA | |
| No | 104(82.5) | 60(86) | |||
P* P for difference among TB patients and community controls; P** P for difference among TB patients and house hold contacts, NA not applicable
Comparison of mean vitamin D levels between newly diagnosed TB patients, household contacts and community controls
| Variables | TB patients ( | Community controls ( |
| Household contacts ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D(nmol/L) Mean ± SD | 30.1 ± 19.3 | 38.5 ± 20.9 | 0.005 | 37.7 ± 12.8 | 0.031 |
P* P for difference of serum vitamin D level between TB patients and community controls; P** P for difference of serum vitamin D level between TB patients and house hold contacts
Proportion of vitamin D deficiency levels among TB patients, community controls and household contacts
| Category | TB cases n (%) | Community controls n (%) |
| Household contacts n (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D deficiency | 105(83.3) | 47(67.1) | 0.009 | 46(80.7) | 0.664 |
| Vitamin D insufficiency | 15(11.9) | 17(24.3) | 0.64 | 7(12.7) | 0.84 |
| Severe vitamin D deficiency | 67(53.2) | 21(30) | 0.002 | 11(19.3) | <0.001 |
| Normal vitamin D level | 6(4.8) | 6(8.6) | 0.28 | 1(1.7) | 00.32 |
Chi-square test was used to test for differences in proportions. P* P for difference among TB patients and community controls, P** P for difference among TB patients and house hold contacts, VDD Vitamin D deficiency ((25(OH)-vitamin D3 ≤ 50 nmol/L)), VDI Vitamin D insufficiency ((25(OH)-vitamin D3 51–75 nmol/L)), SVD Severe vitamin D deficiency(25(OH)-vitamin D3 < 25 nmol/L)
Factors associated with severe vitamin D deficiency (vitamin D level <25 nmol/L) among TB patients and community controls, Northwest Ethiopia (n =196)
| Characteristics | Severe vitamin D deficiency | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes n(%) | No n(%) | CORa (95% CI) | AORb (95% CI) | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 59(45) | 72(55) | 1.02(0.56–1.85) | |
| Female | 29(44.6) | 36(55.4) | 1 | |
| Age | ||||
| <18 | 13(59.1) | 9(40.9) | 1 | |
| 18–30 | 45(38.8) | 71(61.2) | 2.27(0.90–5.76) | |
| 31–50 | 24(50) | 24(50) | 1.44(0.52–4.01) | |
| >50 | 6(60) | 4(40) | 09.6(0.214.42) | |
| BMI | ||||
| <18.5 | 56(55.6) | 43(43.4) | 2.7(1.48–4.73)* | 2.13(1.02–3.28)* |
| >18.5 | 32(33) | 65(67) | 1 | 1 |
| TB status | ||||
| TB positive | 67(53.2) | 59(46.8) | 2.5(1.36–4.52)* | 1.93(1.06–2.86) * |
| TB negative | 21(30) | 49(70) | 1 | 1 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Yes | 19(59.4) | 13(40.6) | 0.48(0.08–2.8) | |
| No | 69(42.1) | 95(57.9) | 1 | |
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 69(60.5) | 45(39.5) | 0.194(0.05–0.8)* | 11.3(0.83–153.5) |
| Rural | 19(23.2) | 63(76.8) | 1 | 1 |
BMI body mass index
Three variables namely, BMI being positive for TB and residence, with a p-values of <0.2 in the bivariate analysis were entered to a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis
*P < 0.05
aCrude Odds Ratio
bAdjusted Odds Ratio