| Literature DB >> 28638459 |
Jolien Van den Bossche1, Christophe Deben1,2, Ken Op de Beeck1,3, Vanessa Deschoolmeester1,2, Christophe Hermans1,2, Ines De Pauw1, Julie Jacobs1,2, Paul Van Schil4, Jan Baptist Vermorken1,5, Patrick Pauwels1,2, Marc Peeters1,5, Filip Lardon1, An Wouters1.
Abstract
Background: Currently, prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is based on clinicopathological factors, including TNM stage. However, there are considerable differences in patient outcome within a similar staging group, even when patients received identical treatments. In order to improve prognostic predictions and to guide treatment options, additional parameters influencing outcome are required. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), a master regulator of mitotic cell division and the DNA damage response, is considered as a new potential biomarker in this research area. While several studies reported Plk1 overexpression in a broad range of human malignancies, inconsistent results were published regarding the clinical significance hereof. A prognostic panel, consisting of Plk1 and additional biomarkers that are related to the Plk1 pathway, might further improve prediction of patient prognosis.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonic anhydrase IX; Hypoxia.; Non-small cell lung cancer; Polo-like kinase 1; Prognostic biomarker; TP53
Year: 2017 PMID: 28638459 PMCID: PMC5479250 DOI: 10.7150/jca.18455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Patient characteristics.
| Patient characteristic | Number of patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Female | 64 (65.3%) |
| Male | 34 (34.7%) |
| Non-smoker | 7 (7.1%) |
| Smoker | 76 (77.6%) |
| Unknown | 15 (15.3%) |
| I | 43 (43.9%) |
| II | 26 (26.5%) |
| III | 22 (22.4%) |
| IV | 7 (7.1%) |
| T1 | 32 (32.7%) |
| T2 | 38 (38.8%) |
| T3 | 22 (22.4%) |
| T4 | 6 (6.1%) |
| N0 | 66 (67.3%) |
| N1 | 19 (19.4%) |
| N2 | 13 (13.3%) |
| M0 | 90 (91.8%) |
| M1 | 8 (8.2%) |
| No | 71 (72.4%) |
| Yes | 27 (27.6%) |
| Poor | 28 (28.6%) |
| Moderate | 34 (34.7%) |
| Well | 36 (36.7%) |
| No | 81 (82.7%) |
| Yes | 17 (17.3%) |
| No | 50 (51.0%) |
| Yes | 40 (40.8%) |
| Unknown | 8 (8.2%) |
Overview of the clinicopathological parameters of patients.
Association between Plk1 expression levels and clinicopathological parameters of NSCLC patients.
| Patient characteristic | Plk1 mRNA expression | Plk1 protein expression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | P-value | Negative/weak | Moderate | Strong | P-value | |
| Control sample | 1.51 ± 0.70 | 0.007 | 16 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | < 0.001 |
| Tumor sample | 5.73 ± 4.40 | 33 (34.7%) | 32 (33.7%) | 30 (31.6%) | ||
| < 60 years | 5.23 ± 3.79 | 0.368 | 21 (63.6%) | 12 (37.5%) | 13 (43.3%) | 0.084 |
| > 60 years | 6.21 ± 4.91 | 12 (36.4%) | 20 (62.5%) | 17 (56.7%) | ||
| Female | 6.06 ± 4.58 | 0.379 | 22 (66.7%) | 22 (68.8%) | 20 (66.7%) | 0.979 |
| Male | 5.03 ± 4.00 | 11 (33.3%) | 10 (31.3%) | 10 (33.3%) | ||
| Non-smoker | 2.51 ± 1.34 | 0.001 | 3 (12.0%) | 2 (7.1%) | 2 (7.1%) | 0.772 |
| Smoker | 5.89 ± 4.50 | 22 (88.0%) | 26 (92.9%) | 26 (92.9%) | ||
| I | 5.69 ± 4.63 | 0.812 | 15 (45.5%) | 12 (37.5%) | 16 (53.3%) | 0.666 |
| II | 5.09 ± 3.21 | 8 (24.2%) | 10 (31.3%) | 7 (23.3%) | ||
| III | 6.20 ± 4.98 | 9 (27.3%) | 8 (25.0%) | 4 (13.3%) | ||
| IV | 7.17 ± 6.21 | 1 (3.0%) | 2 (6.3%) | 3 (10.0%) | ||
| T1 | 5.88 ± 5.11 | 0.949 | 8 (24.2%) | 9 (28.1%) | 13 (43.3%) | 0.289 |
| T2 | 5.91 ± 4.08 | 14 (42.4%) | 14 (43.8%) | 10 (33.3%) | ||
| T3 | 5.16 ± 4.04 | 9 (27.3%) | 5 (15.6%) | 7 (23.3%) | ||
| T4 | 6.15 ± 4.62 | 2 (6.1%) | 4 (12.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| N0 | 5.63 ± 4.36 | 0.959 | 23 (69.7%) | 22 (68.8%) | 20 (66.7%) | 0.999 |
| N1 | 6.02 ± 4.51 | 6 (18.2%) | 6 (18.8%) | 6 (20.0%) | ||
| N2 | 5.83 ± 4.91 | 4 (12.1%) | 6 (20.0%) | 4 (13.3%) | ||
| M0 | 5.63 ± 4.34 | 0.513 | 32 (97.0%) | 29 (90.6%) | 27 (90.0%) | 0.496 |
| M1 | 6.98 ± 5.40 | 1 (3.0%) | 3 (9.4%) | 3 (10.0%) | ||
| No | 6.13 ± 4.60 | 0.426 | 17 (51.5%) | 15 (46.9%) | 18 (60.0%) | 0.577 |
| Yes | 5.26 ± 4.16 | 16 (48.5%) | 17 (53.1%) | 12 (40.0%) | ||
| Poor | 8.13 ± 5.46 | 0.004 | 8 (24.2%) | 8 (25.0%) | 10 (33.3%) | 0.779 |
| Moderate | 5.63 ± 3.65 | 10 (30.3%) | 13 (40.6%) | 10 (33.3%) | ||
| Well | 3.90 ± 3.07 | 15 (45.5%) | 11 (34.4%) | 10 (33.3%) | ||
Upper row: Plk1 expression in control samples versus tumor samples. Other rows: associations between Plk1 expression in tumor samples and clinicopathological parameters of NSCLC patients. Relative Plk1 mRNA expression levels were calculated according to the Ct method of the qbasePLUS software and plotted against normal tissue. For Plk1 protein expression, an IRS score was calculated by multiplying the staining intensity score and % positive cells group. Cases were grouped as Plk1 negative (IRS 0), weak Plk1 positive (IRS 1-3), moderate Plk1 positive (IRS 4-6) or strong Plk1 positive (IRS 7-12).
Association between CA IX expression, cleaved caspase 3 expression, TP53 mutation status and clinicopathological parameters of NSCLC patients.
| Patient characteristic | CA IX protein expression | Cleaved caspase 3 protein expression | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | + | ++ | P-value | - | + | P-value | WT | MT | P-value | |
| Control sample | 14 (88.0%) | 2 (12.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | < 0.001 | 10 (62.5%) | 6 (37.5%) | 0.427 | / | / | / |
| Tumor sample | 4 (4.3%) | 56 (59.6%) | 34 (36.2%) | 49 (50.5%) | 48 (49.5%) | 40 (58.0%) | 29 (42.0%) | |||
| < 60 years | 2 (50.0%) | 28 (50.0%) | 17 (50.0%) | 1.000 | 24 (49.0%) | 23 (47.9%) | 1.000 | 19 (47.5%) | 14 (48.3%) | 1.000 |
| > 60 years | 2 (50.0%) | 28 (50.0%) | 17 (50.0%) | 25 (51.0%) | 25 (52.1%) | 21 (52.5%) | 15 (51.7%) | |||
| Female | 2 (50.0%) | 38 (67.9%) | 20 (58.8%) | 0.579 | 34 (69.4%) | 30 (62.5%) | 0.525 | 28 (70.0%) | 21 (72.4%) | 1.000 |
| Male | 2 (50.0%) | 18 (32.1%) | 14 (41.2%) | 15 (30.6%) | 18 (37.5%) | 12 (30.0%) | 8 (27.6%) | |||
| Non-smoker | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (4.2%) | 5 (17.2%) | 0.124 | 5 (11.9%) | 2 (4.9%) | 0.433 | 4 (12.5%) | 1 (3.8%) | 0.367 |
| Smoker | 3 (100%) | 46 (95.8%) | 24 (82.8%) | 37 (88.1%) | 39 (95.1%) | 28 (87.5%) | 25 (96.2%) | |||
| I | 3 (75.0%) | 25 (44.6%) | 13 (38.2%) | 0.247 | 18 (36.7%) | 25 (52.1%) | 0.064 | 16 (40.0%) | 11 (37.9%) | 0.990 |
| II | 0 (0.0%) | 18 (32.1%) | 8 (23.5%) | 17 (34.7%) | 9 (18.8%) | 11 (27.5%) | 9 (31.0%) | |||
| III | 0 0.0%) | 11 (19.6%) | 10 (29.4%) | 9 (18.4%) | 13 (27.1%) | 9 (22.5%) | 6 (20.7%) | |||
| IV | 1 (25.0%) | 2 (3.6%) | 3 (8.8%) | 5 (10.2%) | 1 (2.1%) | 4 (10.0%) | 3 (10.3%) | |||
| T1 | 1 (25.0%) | 21 (37.5%) | 10 (29.4%) | 0.562 | 12 (24.5%) | 20 (41.7%) | 0.321 | 13 (32.5%) | 7 (24.1%) | 0.796 |
| T2 | 3 (75.0%) | 18 (32.1%) | 15 (44.1%) | 22 (44.9%) | 15 (31.3%) | 15 (37.5%) | 11 (37.9%) | |||
| T3 | 0 (0.0%) | 14 (25.0%) | 6 (17.6%) | 12 (24.5%) | 10 (20.8%) | 10 (25.0%) | 10 (34.5%) | |||
| T4 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (5.4%) | 3 (8.8%) | 3 (6.1%) | 3 (6.3%) | 2 (5.0%) | 1 (3.4%) | |||
| N0 | 3 (75.0%) | 41 (73.2%) | 19 (55.9%) | 0.349 | 31 (63.3%) | 35 (72.9%) | 0.315 | 27 (67.5%) | 19 (65.5%) | 0.720 |
| N1 | 0 (0.0%) | 9 (16.1%) | 10 (29.4%) | 12 (24.5%) | 6 (12.5%) | 7 (17.5%) | 7 (24.1%) | |||
| N2 | 1 (25.0%) | 6 (10.7%) | 5 (14.7%) | 6 (12.2%) | 7 (14.5%) | 6 (15.0%) | 3 (10.3%) | |||
| M0 | 3 (75.0%) | 53 (94.6%) | 31 (91.2%) | 0.327 | 43 (87.8%) | 47 (97.9%) | 0.111 | 36 (90.0%) | 26 (89.7%) | 1.000 |
| M1 | 1 (25.0%) | 3 (5.4%) | 3 (8.8%) | 6 (12.2%) | 1 (2.1%) | 4 (10.0%) | 3 (10.3%) | |||
| Poor | 0 (0.0%) | 17 (30.4%) | 8 (23.5%) | 0.074 | 10 (20.4%) | 17 (35.4%) | 0.155 | 11 (27.5%) | 8 (27.6%) | 0.893 |
| Moderate | 3 (75.0%) | 22 (39.3%) | 8 (23.5%) | 21 (42.9%) | 13 (27.1%) | 13 (32.5%) | 8 (27.6%) | |||
| Well | 1 (25.0%) | 17 (30.4%) | 18 (62.9%) | 18 (36.7%) | 18 (37.5%) | 16 (40.0%) | 13 (44.8%) | |||
| No | 2 (50.0%) | 33 (58.9%) | 13 (38.2%) | 0.163 | 23 (46.9%) | 28 (58.3%) | 0.312 | 19 (47.5%) | 16 (55.2%) | 0.628 |
| Yes | 2 (50.0%) | 23 (41.1%) | 21 (61.8%) | 26 (53.1%) | 20 (41.7%) | 21 (52.5%) | 13 (44.8%) | |||
Upper row: CA IX expression, cleaved caspase 3 expression and TP53 mutations in control samples versus tumor samples. Other rows: associations between CA IX expression, cleaved caspase 3 expression or TP53 mutations in tumor samples and clinicopathological parameters of NSCLC patients. For CA IX staining: - negative, + weak/moderate positive, ++ strong positive. For cleaved caspase 3 staining: - < 5% positive cells, + > 5% positive cells. For TP53 status: WT wild type, MT mutant.
Survival analysis of NSCLC patients.
| Univariate survival analysis | Multivariate Cox regression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | P-value | 95% CI | HR | P-value | 95% CI | |
| 1.150 | 0.001 | 1.055 - 1.253 | 1.126 | 0.075 | 0.988 - 1.283 | |
| 2.560 | 0.002 | 1.396 - 4.675 | 6.484 | 0.010 | 1.566 - 26.838 | |
| 3.240 | 0.004 | 1.456 - 7.098 | 5.766 | 0.011 | 1.506 - 22.079 | |
| 2.470 | 0.006 | 1.263 - 4.879 | 5.680 | 0.038 | 1.104 - 29.225 | |
| 1.466 | 0.050 | 1.000 - 2.140 | ||||
| 3.635 | 0.002 | 1.521 - 7.866 | ||||
HR: Hazard Ratio, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.