| Literature DB >> 28638268 |
Li-Sung Hsu1,2, Ren-Hung Huang3, Hung-Wen Lai4,5, Hui-Ting Hsu3,6,7,8, Wen-Wei Sung6,7,8,9, Ming-Ju Hsieh10,11, Chong-Yu Wu1, Yueh-Min Lin3,8, Mu-Kuan Chen7,12, Yu-Sheng Lo10, Chih-Jung Chen3,7,8.
Abstract
Krüppel-like factors can bind to specific DNA motifs and regulate various cellular functions, such as metabolism, cell proliferation, and differentiation. Krüppel-like factor 6 (KLF6), a member of this family, is downregulated in human cancers. Oral cancer is a highly prevalent type in Taiwan. Although KLF6 overexpression in human cancer cells inhibits cell proliferation, induces apoptosis, and attenuates cell migration, the effects of KLF6 on oral cancer remains poorly elucidated. This study investigated the role of KLF6 in oral cancer tumorigenesis. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that nuclear KLF6 level was significantly and inversely associated with tumor size and stages. KLF6 overexpression attenuated the migration and invasion of oral cancer SAS cells. Zymography assay demonstrated that KLF6 inhibited the activities of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and weakened the expression of mesenchymal markers, such as snail, slug, and vimentin. Our study is the first to provide demonstrate that KLF6 functions as a tumor suppressor gene and prevents the metastasis of oral cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: kruppel-like factor 6 (KLF6); matrix metalloproteinase 9.; migration; oral cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28638268 PMCID: PMC5479121 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.19024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Relationships of nucleus KLF6 with clinical parameters in oral cancer patients.
| Parameters | Case number | nucleus KLF6 expression | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <2 | ≥2 | |||
| Age (year) | 55.7±11.2 | 55.1±11.1 | 0.660 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 16 | 8 (50.0) | 8 (50.0) | 0.219 |
| Male | 281 | 183 (65.1) | 98 (34.9) | |
| Smoking | ||||
| No | 77 | 47 (60.1) | 30 (39.0) | 0.482 |
| Yes | 129 | 85 (65.9) | 44 (34.1) | |
| Betal quid | ||||
| No | 63 | 43 (68.3) | 20 (31.7) | 0.058 |
| Yes | 62 | 32 (51.6) | 30 (48.4) | |
| Differentiation | ||||
| Well | 44 | 24 (54.5) | 20 (45.5) | 0.216 |
| Moderate | 245 | 163 (66.5) | 82 (33.5) | |
| Poor | 8 | 4 (50.0) | 4 (50.0) | |
| Stage | ||||
| I+II | 120 | 66 (55.0) | 54 (45.0) | 0.006 |
| III+IV | 177 | 125 (70.6) | 52 (29.4) | |
| T value | ||||
| 1+2+3 | 194 | 121 (62.4) | 73 (37.6) | 0.339 |
| 4 | 103 | 70 (68.0) | 33 (32.0) | |
| N value | ||||
| 0 | 192 | 118 (61.5) | 74 (38.5) | 0.165 |
| 1+2+3 | 105 | 73 (69.5) | 32 (30.5) | |
1missing 91 cases; 2missing 172 cases
Figure 1The expression pattern of KLF6 in oral cancer and its relationship with overall survival. (A) The immunohistochemical staining for the expression of KLF6 in oral cancer patients. Upper panel: the expression level < 2. Lower panel: the expression level ≧2. (B)A Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the oral cancer patients with nuclear expression of KLF6 protein. No significant difference of overall survival rate was found in patients with KLF6 expression < 2 (green line) compared to those with KLF6 expression ≧2 (blue line) (P = 0.839).
Figure 2KLF6 attenuated the (A) migration and (B) invasion of oral cancer cells and (C) suppressed MMP-9 activities. SAS cells were infected with pEGFP or pEGFP-KLF6 and subjected to migration (A) or invasion (B) assay. Conditional media derived from SAS cells transfected with pEGFP or pEGFP-KLF6 were subjected to zymography assay. MMP-2 and MMP-9 were indicated. Data represent mean ± S.D. * and ** denote P < 0.05 compared with cells expressing GFP alone.
Figure 3KLF6 reversed the expression of mesenchymal markers. Cell lysates from SAS cell overexpressing pEGFP or pEFGP-KLF6 were examined through Western blot. Right panel: data representing mean ± S.D. * and ** denote P < 0.05 and P < 0.001 compared with cells expressing GFP alone, respectively.