Literature DB >> 28637663

NY-ESO-1 TCR single edited stem and central memory T cells to treat multiple myeloma without graft-versus-host disease.

Sara Mastaglio1,2, Pietro Genovese3, Zulma Magnani1, Eliana Ruggiero1, Elisa Landoni1, Barbara Camisa1, Giulia Schiroli3,4, Elena Provasi1, Angelo Lombardo3,4, Andreas Reik5, Nicoletta Cieri1, Martina Rocchi6, Giacomo Oliveira1, Giulia Escobar3,4, Monica Casucci7, Bernhard Gentner2,3, Antonello Spinelli8, Anna Mondino9, Attilio Bondanza2,7, Luca Vago2,10, Maurilio Ponzoni4,6,11, Fabio Ciceri2,4, Michael C Holmes5, Luigi Naldini3,4, Chiara Bonini1,4.   

Abstract

Transfer of T-cell receptors (TCRs) specific for tumor-associated antigens is a promising approach for cancer immunotherapy. We developed the TCR gene editing technology that is based on the knockout of the endogenous TCR α and β genes, followed by the introduction of tumor-specific TCR genes, and that proved safer and more effective than conventional TCR gene transfer. Although successful, complete editing requires extensive cell manipulation and 4 transduction procedures. Here we propose a novel and clinically feasible TCR "single editing" (SE) approach, based on the disruption of the endogenous TCR α chain only, followed by the transfer of genes encoding for a tumor-specific TCR. We validated SE with the clinical grade HLA-A2 restricted NY-ESO-1157-165-specific TCR. SE allowed the rapid production of high numbers of tumor-specific T cells, with optimal TCR expression and preferential stem memory and central memory phenotype. Similarly to unedited T cells redirected by TCR gene transfer (TCR transferred [TR]), SE T cells efficiently killed NY-ESO-1pos targets; however, although TR cells proved highly alloreactive, SE cells showed a favorable safety profile. Accordingly, when infused in NSG mice previously engrafted with myeloma, SE cells mediated tumor rejection without inducing xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease, thus resulting in significantly higher survival than that observed in mice treated with TR cells. Overall, single TCR gene editing represents a clinically feasible approach that is able to increase the safety and efficacy of cancer adoptive immunotherapy.
© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28637663     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-732636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  31 in total

Review 1.  Novel Immunotherapies for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Mattia D'Agostino; Mario Boccadoro; Eric L Smith
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Simultaneous Deletion of Endogenous TCRαβ for TCR Gene Therapy Creates an Improved and Safe Cellular Therapeutic.

Authors:  Laura T Morton; Rogier M Reijmers; Anne K Wouters; Christiaan Kweekel; Dennis F G Remst; Cilia R Pothast; J H Frederik Falkenburg; Mirjam H M Heemskerk
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 11.454

3.  A Potent Tumor-Reactive p53-Specific Single-Chain TCR without On- or Off-Target Autoimmunity In Vivo.

Authors:  Hakim Echchannaoui; Jutta Petschenka; Edite Antunes Ferreira; Beate Hauptrock; Carina Lotz-Jenne; Ralf-Holger Voss; Matthias Theobald
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 4.  Gene editing to enhance the efficacy of cancer cell therapies.

Authors:  Tara Murty; Crystal L Mackall
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Targeted T cell receptor gene editing provides predictable T cell product function for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas R Müller; Sebastian Jarosch; Monika Hammel; Justin Leube; Simon Grassmann; Bettina Bernard; Manuel Effenberger; Immanuel Andrä; M Zeeshan Chaudhry; Theresa Käuferle; Antje Malo; Luka Cicin-Sain; Peter Steinberger; Tobias Feuchtinger; Ulrike Protzer; Kathrin Schumann; Michael Neuenhahn; Kilian Schober; Dirk H Busch
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-08-17

6.  Inhibition of AKT signaling uncouples T cell differentiation from expansion for receptor-engineered adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Joseph G Crompton; Anthony J Leonardi; Tori N Yamamoto; Smita S Chandran; Robert L Eil; Madhusudhanan Sukumar; Suman K Vodnala; Jinhui Hu; Yun Ji; David Clever; Mary A Black; Devikala Gurusamy; Michael J Kruhlak; Ping Jin; David F Stroncek; Luca Gattinoni; Steven A Feldman; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-12-07

7.  Mutated nucleophosmin 1 as immunotherapy target in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Dyantha I van der Lee; Rogier M Reijmers; Maria W Honders; Renate S Hagedoorn; Rob Cm de Jong; Michel Gd Kester; Dirk M van der Steen; Arnoud H de Ru; Christiaan Kweekel; Helena M Bijen; Inge Jedema; Hendrik Veelken; Peter A van Veelen; Mirjam Hm Heemskerk; J H Frederik Falkenburg; Marieke Griffioen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Cancer immune therapy for lymphoid malignancies: recent advances.

Authors:  Uffe Klausen; Nicolai Grønne Dahlager Jørgensen; Jacob Handlos Grauslund; Morten Orebo Holmström; Mads Hald Andersen
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 9.  The promise and perils of immunotherapy.

Authors:  Stefanie Lesch; Saar Gill
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-09-28

Review 10.  CRISPR/Cas9 Gene-Editing in Cancer Immunotherapy: Promoting the Present Revolution in Cancer Therapy and Exploring More.

Authors:  Xuejin Ou; Qizhi Ma; Wei Yin; Xuelei Ma; Zhiyao He
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.