Literature DB >> 28637581

How partnership type and HIV seroconcordance affect HIV transmission risk in regular sexual partnerships: a cross-sectional survey of Australian gay and bisexual men.

Benjamin R Bavinton1, Andrew E Grulich1, Duane Duncan2, Iryna B Zablotska1, Garrett P Prestage1.   

Abstract

Background Regular sexual partnerships among gay and bisexual men (GBM) who practice condomless anal intercourse (CLAI) have not been well characterised in terms of partnership type, HIV seroconcordance and risk of HIV transmission. Primarily sexual regular partnerships, although commonly reported by gay men, have largely been ignored in research and HIV prevention. Among regular partners reporting CLAI with each other, we determined factors differentiating romantic or committed relationships from partnerships organised primarily around sex ('fuckbuddies') and estimated the proportion of CLAI presenting risk for HIV transmission.
METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey of Australian GBM was conducted. Univariate and multivariate generalised estimating equations were used to determine statistical associations.
RESULTS: Men reported on 2250 regular sexual partnerships. Over half the partnerships were romantic or committed relationships. Over half the partnerships were HIV-negative seroconcordant (54.9%), 3.1% were HIV-positive seroconcordant, 5.2% were serodiscordant and 36.8% were of unknown seroconcordance. Potential risks presented by CLAI were sometimes mitigated by protective factors, such as having a clear spoken agreement about sex with outside partners, having fewer outside partners, openly discussing HIV risk and having an agreement to reduce risk from outside partners. These protective factors were more often found in romantic or committed relationships than among primarily sexual partnerships, and were less often found in partnerships of unknown seroconcordance.
CONCLUSION: CLAI is more common among regular sexual partnerships considered to be of a romantic, committed nature. However, factors associated with such romantic or committed partnerships can also protect against HIV transmission risk. Unknown seroconcordance, particularly lack of communication about HIV status among primarily sexual partnerships, is a key risk factor that needs to be addressed by HIV education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28637581     DOI: 10.1071/SH16198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Health        ISSN: 1448-5028            Impact factor:   2.706


  3 in total

1.  Does HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Modify the Effect of Partnership Characteristics on Condom Use? A Cross-Sectional Study of Sexual Partnerships Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in San Francisco, California.

Authors:  Maximo R Prescott; Jaclyn Hern; Maya Petersen; Glenn-Milo Santos
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  Baseline Preferences for Daily, Event-Driven, or Periodic HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Gay and Bisexual Men in the PRELUDE Demonstration Project.

Authors:  Stefanie J Vaccher; Christopher Gianacas; David J Templeton; Isobel M Poynten; Bridget G Haire; Catriona Ooi; Rosalind Foster; Anna McNulty; Andrew E Grulich; Iryna B Zablotska
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-12-15

3.  Strategies used by gay male HIV serodiscordant couples to reduce the risk of HIV transmission from anal intercourse in three countries.

Authors:  Benjamin R Bavinton; Garrett P Prestage; Fengyi Jin; Nittaya Phanuphak; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Christopher K Fairley; David Baker; Jennifer Hoy; David J Templeton; Ban K Tee; Anthony Kelleher; Andrew E Grulich
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.396

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.