Literature DB >> 28636564

Radiation dosimetry in magnetic fields with Farmer-type ionization chambers: determination of magnetic field correction factors for different magnetic field strengths and field orientations.

C K Spindeldreier1, O Schrenk, A Bakenecker, I Kawrakow, L Burigo, C P Karger, S Greilich, A Pfaffenberger.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine magnetic field correction factors that are needed for dosimetry in hybrid devices for MR-guided radiotherapy for Farmer-type ionization chambers for different magnetic field strengths and field orientations. The response of six custom-built Farmer-type chambers irradiated at a 6 MV linac was measured in a water tank positioned in a magnet with magnetic field strengths between 0.0 T and 1.1 T. Chamber axis, beam and magnetic field were perpendicular to each other and both magnetic field directions were investigated. EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations were compared to the measurements and simulations with different field orientations were performed. For all geometries, magnetic field correction factors, [Formula: see text], and perturbation factors were calculated. A maximum increase of 8.8% in chamber response was measured for the magnetic field perpendicular to chamber and beam axis. The measured chamber response could be reproduced by adjusting the dead volume layer near the chamber stem in the Monte Carlo simulations. For the magnetic field parallel to the chamber axis or parallel to the beam, the simulated response increased by 1.1% at maximum for field strengths up to 1.1 T. A complex dependence of the response was found on chamber radius, magnetic field strength and orientation of beam, chamber axis and magnetic field direction. Especially for magnetic fields perpendicular to beam and chamber axis, the exact sensitive volume has to be considered in the simulations. To minimize magnetic field correction factors and the influence of dead volumes on the response of Farmer chambers, a measurement set-up with the magnetic field parallel to the chamber axis or parallel to the beam is recommended for dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28636564     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7ae4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Relative dosimetry with an MR-linac: Response of ion chambers, diamond, and diode detectors for off-axis, depth dose, and output factor measurements.

Authors:  Daniel J O'Brien; James Dolan; Stefan Pencea; Nicholas Schupp; Gabriel O Sawakuchi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Commissioning of a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-linac: A single institution experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Snyder; Joël St-Aubin; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Amanda Boczkowski; David A P Dunkerley; Stephen A Graves; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Technical Note: Consistency of PTW30013 and FC65-G ion chamber magnetic field correction factors.

Authors:  S J Woodings; B van Asselen; T L van Soest; L A de Prez; J J W Lagendijk; B W Raaymakers; J W H Wolthaus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Impact of magnetic fields on dose measurement with small ion chambers illustrated in high-resolution response maps.

Authors:  Joerg Lehmann; Toby Beveridge; Chris Oliver; Tracy E Bailey; Jessica E Lye; Jayde Livingstone; Andrew W Stevenson; Duncan J Butler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Influence of beam quality on reference dosimetry correction factors in magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stefan Pojtinger; Marcel Nachbar; Ralf-Peter Kapsch; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27

6.  The effect of density overrides on magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy planning for lung cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Schrenk; Claudia Katharina Spindeldreier; Daniela Schmitt; Falk Roeder; Mark Bangert; Lucas Norberto Burigo; Asja Pfaffenberger
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-22

7.  Practical guidelines of online MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okamoto; Hiroshi Igaki; Takahito Chiba; Keiko Shibuya; Tatsuya Sakasai; Keiichi Jingu; Koji Inaba; Kagayaki Kuroda; Shigeki Aoki; Daisaku Tatsumi; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Noriyuki Kadoya; Yoshinobu Furuyama; Yu Kumazaki; Naoki Tohyama; Masato Tsuneda; Shie Nishioka; Jun Itami; Hiroshi Onishi; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Takashi Uno
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.438

Review 8.  Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Giulia Buizza; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Moritz Rabe; Chiara Paganelli; Guido Baroni; Michael Reiner; Paul J Keall; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Marco Riboldi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.