Mareike Finke1,2, Hanna Bönitz1, Björn Lyxell3,4,5, Angelika Illg1. 1. a Department of Otolaryngology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany. 2. b Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all" , Oldenburg & Hannover , Germany. 3. c Linnaeus Centre HEAD , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden. 4. d Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden , and. 5. e The Swedish Institute for Disability Research , Linköping University , Linköping , Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: By extending the indication criteria for cochlear implants (CI), the population of CI candidates increased in age, as well as range and type of hearing loss. This qualitative study identified factors that contributed to seek CI treatment in single-sided deaf individuals and gained insights how single-sided deafness (SSD) and hearing with a CI affect their lives. DESIGN: An open-ended questionnaire and a standardised inventory (IOI-HA) were used. Qualitative data reflecting the reasons to seek CI treatment and the individual experiences after CI switch-on were collected. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 19 postlingually deafened single-sided deaf CI users. RESULTS: Participants use their CI daily and stated that their life satisfaction increased since CI activation. The analysis of the qualitative data revealed four core categories: sound localisation, tinnitus and noise sensitivity, fear to lose the second ear and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show how strongly and diversely quality of hearing and quality of life is affected by acquired SSD and improved after CI activation. Our data suggest that the fear of hearing loss (HL) on the normal hearing (NH) ear is an important but so far neglected reason to seek treatment with a CI in individuals with postlingual SSD.
OBJECTIVES: By extending the indication criteria for cochlear implants (CI), the population of CI candidates increased in age, as well as range and type of hearing loss. This qualitative study identified factors that contributed to seek CI treatment in single-sided deaf individuals and gained insights how single-sided deafness (SSD) and hearing with a CI affect their lives. DESIGN: An open-ended questionnaire and a standardised inventory (IOI-HA) were used. Qualitative data reflecting the reasons to seek CI treatment and the individual experiences after CI switch-on were collected. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 19 postlingually deafened single-sided deaf CI users. RESULTS:Participants use their CI daily and stated that their life satisfaction increased since CI activation. The analysis of the qualitative data revealed four core categories: sound localisation, tinnitus and noise sensitivity, fear to lose the second ear and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show how strongly and diversely quality of hearing and quality of life is affected by acquired SSD and improved after CI activation. Our data suggest that the fear of hearing loss (HL) on the normal hearing (NH) ear is an important but so far neglected reason to seek treatment with a CI in individuals with postlingual SSD.
Authors: S Arndt; T Wesarg; Y Stelzig; R Jacob; A Illg; A Lesinski-Schiedat; M C Ketterer; A Aschendorff; I Speck Journal: HNO Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: Peter R Dixon; David Feeny; George Tomlinson; Sharon Cushing; Joseph M Chen; Murray D Krahn Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Emily Buss; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown Journal: Trends Hear Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.293
Authors: Samar A Idriss; Pierre Reynard; Mathieu Marx; Albane Mainguy; Charles-Alexandre Joly; Eugen Constant Ionescu; Kelly K S Assouly; Hung Thai-Van Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-26 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Magdalena Sosna-Duranowska; Grazyna Tacikowska; Elzbieta Gos; Anna Krupa; Piotr Henryk Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 4.003