Literature DB >> 28635338

Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population.

Alpesh Amin1, Allison Keshishian2, Jeffrey Trocio3, Oluwaseyi Dina3, Hannah Le4, Lisa Rosenblatt4, Xianchen Liu3, Jack Mardekian3, Qisu Zhang2, Onur Baser5,6,7, Lien Vo4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk and cost of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding between each direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.
METHODS: Patients (≥65 years) initiating warfarin or DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) were selected from the Medicare database from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2014. Patients initiating each DOAC were matched 1:1 to warfarin patients using propensity score matching to balance demographics and clinical characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs. warfarin. Two-part models were used to compare the stroke/SE- and major-bleeding-related medical costs between matched cohorts.
RESULTS: Of the 186,132 eligible patients, 20,803 apixaban-warfarin pairs, 52,476 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs, and 16,731 dabigatran-warfarin pairs were matched. Apixaban (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31, 0.53) and rivaroxaban (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.63, 0.83) were significantly associated with lower risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Apixaban (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.44, 0.58) and dabigatran (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.69, 0.91) were significantly associated with lower risk of major bleeding; rivaroxaban (HR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.10, 1.26) was significantly associated with higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Compared to warfarin, apixaban ($63 vs. $131) and rivaroxaban ($93 vs. $139) had significantly lower stroke/SE-related medical costs; apixaban ($292 vs. $529) and dabigatran ($369 vs. $450) had significantly lower major bleeding-related medical costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the DOACs in the study, only apixaban is associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Warfarin; atrial fibrillation; direct oral anticoagulants; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28635338     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1345729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  19 in total

1.  The real world use of combined P-glycoprotein and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors with rivaroxaban or apixaban increases bleeding.

Authors:  Sarah Hanigan; Jessica Das; Kristen Pogue; Geoffrey D Barnes; Michael P Dorsch
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  [Prehospital management of acute coronary syndrome in patients on long-term direct oral anticoagulant treatment].

Authors:  E Schneck; F K Schneck; J S Wolter; C W Hamm; V Mann; H Hauch; B Kemkes-Matthes; J T Gräsner; H V Groesdonk; D Dirkmann; M Sander; C Koch; F Brenck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Relationship Amongst Vitamin K Status, Vitamin K Antagonist Use and Osteoarthritis: A Review.

Authors:  Kok-Yong Chin; Kok-Lun Pang; Sok Kuan Wong; Deborah Chia Hsin Chew; Haji Mohd Saad Qodriyah
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.271

Review 4.  Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban in over 3.9 Million People with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J R Buckley; Deirdre A Lane; Peter Calvert; Juqian Zhang; David Gent; C Daniel Mullins; Paul Dorian; Shun Kohsaka; Stefan H Hohnloser; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Major bleeding risk associated with oral anticoagulant in real clinical practice. A multicentre 3-year period population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jacques Bouget; Frédéric Balusson; Maxime Maignan; Laure Pavageau; Pierre-Marie Roy; Karine Lacut; Lucie-Marie Scailteux; Emmanuel Nowak; Emmanuel Oger
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Non-valvular atrial fibrillation: impact of apixaban on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Adam Ioannou; Irene Tsappa; Sofia Metaxa; Constantinos G Missouris
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2017-11-03

7.  Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  Yana Vinogradova; Carol Coupland; Trevor Hill; Julia Hippisley-Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-07-04

8.  Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Allison Keshishian; Xiaoyan Li; Melissa Hamilton; Cristina Masseria; Kiran Gupta; Xuemei Luo; Jack Mardekian; Keith Friend; Anagha Nadkarni; Xianying Pan; Onur Baser; Steven Deitelzweig
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Frailty and Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation : A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dae Hyun Kim; Ajinkya Pawar; Joshua J Gagne; Lily G Bessette; Hemin Lee; Robert J Glynn; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Incidence Rates of Bleeding and Emergency Surgery Due to Trauma or Fracture Among Japanese Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Oral Anticoagulation Therapy.

Authors:  Masahiro Yasaka; Hiroyuki Yokota; Michiyasu Suzuki; Teiichi Yamane; Yasuhisa Ono
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2020-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.