Literature DB >> 28634503

Monitoring the Diagnostic Process on an Inpatient Neurology Service.

Amar Dhand1, Robert Bucelli2, Arun Varadhachary2, Michael Tsiaklides2, Gabriela de Bruin2, Gurpreet Dhaliwal3.   

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care called for tools to monitor physicians' diagnostic process. We addressed this need by developing a tool for clinicians to record and analyze their diagnostic process. The tool was a secure web application in which clinicians used a structured grading system to assess the relative impact of clinical, laboratory, and neuroimaging data for every new diagnosis. Four neurohospitalists used the tool for 6.5 months on a general neurology ward service at a single tertiary-level teaching hospital. Process measures of tool use included number of diagnoses entered, time spent on each data entry, and concordance of diagnoses compared to the medical record. We also aggregated the data across clinicians to examine the average process scores across common inpatient disorders. The 4 clinicians entered 254 new diagnoses that took approximately 3 minutes per patient. In 50 randomly chosen cases, the neurohospitalists' diagnoses entered into the tool agreed with 92% of diagnoses in the medical record, which was better than the agreement between billing code and medical record diagnoses (74%). The diagnostic process varied across disease categories, showing a spectrum of clinical-dominant (eg, headache), laboratory-dominant (eg, encephalitis), and neuroimaging-dominant (eg, stroke) disorders. This study demonstrated the feasibility of a clinician-driven diagnostic process monitoring system, along with preliminary characterization of the process for common disorders. The tracking of diagnostic process has the potential to promote reflection on clinical practice, deconstruct neurologists' clinical decision-making, and improve health-care safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical decision-making; diagnosis; process assessment

Year:  2016        PMID: 28634503      PMCID: PMC5467819          DOI: 10.1177/1941874416677681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurohospitalist        ISSN: 1941-8744


  12 in total

1.  Right brain: The case library as a tool to enhance clinical observation.

Authors:  Amar Dhand
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Measurement Is Essential for Improving Diagnosis and Reducing Diagnostic Error: A Report From the Institute of Medicine.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Kathryn M McDonald; Christine K Cassel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients.

Authors:  J R Hampton; M J Harrison; J R Mitchell; J S Prichard; C Seymour
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-05-31

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Bringing diagnosis into the quality and safety equations.

Authors:  Mark L Graber; Robert M Wachter; Christine K Cassel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors.

Authors:  Gordon D Schiff; Omar Hasan; Seijeoung Kim; Richard Abrams; Karen Cosby; Bruce L Lambert; Arthur S Elstein; Scott Hasler; Martin L Kabongo; Nela Krosnjar; Richard Odwazny; Mary F Wisniewski; Robert A McNutt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

7.  Minimizing diagnostic error: the importance of follow-up and feedback.

Authors:  Gordon D Schiff
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 7.035

9.  The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine.

Authors:  Mark L Graber
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  The challenges in defining and measuring diagnostic error.

Authors:  Laura Zwaan; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Diagnosis (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.