| Literature DB >> 28634414 |
Wengang Chen1, Dongchuan Wang2, Yong Huang3, Liding Chen3, Lihui Zhang1, Xiangwang Wei4, Mengqin Sang1, Feicui Wang1, Jinya Liu1, Bingxu Hu1.
Abstract
Increasing coastal reclamation activities have been undertaken to solve the conflict between people and land resources, creating significant challenges for coordinating coastal reclamation, economic development and environmental protection. This paper analyzes the effects of coast reclamation on Gross Domestic Product growth and the quality of inshore seawater in the Tianjin Binhai New Area. Remote sensing and a Geographic Information System were used to extract the information of coastal reclamation. The correlation between the area of coastal reclamation, GDP growth and the quality of inshore seawater was analyzed and a decoupling elasticity model was used to explore trends in the relationship between economic development and coastal reclamation. Results showed that coastal reclamation activities played an important role in promoting economic development, but greatly damaged the ecological environment. Although the relationship between coastal reclamation and economic development has weakened during the last three periods, the influence on the environment will continue because of the cumulative effects of pollution. To maintain a balance between coastal reclamation, economic development and environmental protection, (1) coastal reclamation planning must address both economic and environmental outcomes; (2) environmental deficiencies from existing coastal reclamation projects must be rectified; and (3) the legal system regulating coastal reclamation needs to be refined and strengthened.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28634414 PMCID: PMC5478608 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04155-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Coastline changes for the TBNA from1995 to 2015. Figure 1 was generated by ArcGIS v10.2 software (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc, USA, URL http://www.esri.com/).
Statistics for coastline length and coastal reclamation area in the TBNA.
| Year | Cumulative coastline length(km) | Coastal reclamation area(5-yearly summed in km2) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wet land | Construction land | ||
| 1995 | 134.42 | — | — |
| 2000 | 133.98 | 3.74 | 2.52 |
| 2005 | 145.48 | 36.49 | 32.09 |
| 2010 | 250.38 | 26.84 | 127.67 |
| 2015 | 319.24 | 28.62 | 99.38 |
Figure 2Scatter diagrams. (a) Coastal reclamation area and GDP growth, (b) Coastal reclamation area and pollution degree of sea water, and (c) Coastal reclamation area and pollution degree of sea water except for 2009.
Figure 3Graph of coastal reclamation area and GDP growth.
Table of the decoupling model.
| Period | Change rate of coastal reclamation (%) | GDP change rate (%) | Elasticity value | Type of decoupling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| P2(2002–2006) | 408.50 | 125.01 | 3.27 | Expansive negative decoupling |
| P3(2003–2007) | 278.87 | 125.39 | 2.22 | Expansive negative decoupling |
| P4(2004–2008) | 549.34 | 130.39 | 4.21 | Expansive negative decoupling |
| P5(2005–2009) | 524.83 | 136.75 | 3.84 | Expansive negative decoupling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| P7(2007–2011) | 99.96 | 152.46 | 0.66 | Weak decoupling |
| P8(2008–2012) | 141.35 | 148.48 | 0.95 | Expansive coupling |
| P9(2009–2013) | −12.57 | 137.50 | −0.09 | Strong decoupling |
| P10(2010–2014) | −35.47 | 121.77 | −0.29 | Strong decoupling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Data in the three main periods (e.g. 2001–2005, 2006–2010 and 2011–2015) are shown in bold for the convenience of identifying decoupling change trends in the whole time series.
Figure 4Change in elasticity value between coastal reclamation area and GDP with time.
Figure 5Location of Tianjin Binhai New Area. Figure 5 was generated by ArcGIS v10.2 software (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc, USA, URL http://www.esri.com/).
Figure 6Coordinated figure of decoupling types (modified from Tapio)[39].