Literature DB >> 28634285

Frequency of chest pain in primary care, diagnostic tests performed and final diagnoses.

Beatrijs Bn Hoorweg1, Robert Ta Willemsen1, Lotte E Cleef1, Tom Boogaerts2, Frank Buntinx1,2, Jan Fc Glatz3, Geert Jan Dinant1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Observational study of patients with chest pain in primary care: determination of incidence, referral rate, diagnostic tests and (agreement between) working and final diagnoses.
METHODS: 118 general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands and Belgium recorded all patient contacts during  2weeks. Furthermore, patients presenting with chest pain were registered extensively. A follow-up form was filled in after 30 days.
RESULTS: 22 294 patient contacts were registered. In 281 (1.26%), chest pain was a reason for consulting the GP (mean age for men 54.4/women 53 years). In this cohort of 281 patients, in 38.1% of patients, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was suspected at least temporarily during consultation, 40.2% of patients were referred to secondary care and 512 diagnostic tests were performed by GPs and consulted specialists. Musculoskeletal pain was the most frequent working (26.1%) and final diagnoses (33.1%). Potentially life-threatening diseases as final diagnosis (such as myocardial infarction) accounted for 8.4% of all chest pain cases. In 23.1% of cases, a major difference between working and final diagnoses was found, in 0.7% a severe disease was initially missed by the GP.
CONCLUSION: Chest pain was present in 281 patients (1.26% of all consultations). Final diagnoses were mostly non-life-threatening. Nevertheless, in 8.4% of patients with chest pain, life-threatening underlying causes were identified. This seems reflected in the magnitude and wide variety of diagnostic tests performed in these patients by GPs and specialists, in the (safe) overestimation of life-threatening diseases by GPs at initial assessment and in the high referral rate we found. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndromes; coronary artery disease; epidemiology; health care delivery; quality and outcomes of care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28634285     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  24 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of a rule-out algorithm of acute myocardial infarction in low-risk patients: emergency primary care versus hospital setting.

Authors:  Tonje R Johannessen; Sigrun Halvorsen; Dan Atar; John Munkhaugen; Anne Kathrine Nore; Torbjørn Wisløff; Odd Martin Vallersnes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Evaluating the Coronary Artery Disease Consortium Model and the Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in a Symptomatic Mixed Asian Cohort.

Authors:  Lohendran Baskaran; Yu Pei Neo; Jing Kai Lee; Yeonyee Elizabeth Yoon; Yilin Jiang; Subhi J Al'Aref; Alexander R van Rosendael; Donghee Han; Fay Y Lin; Rine Nakanishi; Pál Maurovich Horvat; Swee Yaw Tan; Todd C Villines; Marcio S Bittencourt; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 6.106

3.  Managing chest pain patients in general practice: an interview-based study.

Authors:  Leen Biesemans; Lotte E Cleef; Robert T A Willemsen; Beatrijs B N Hoorweg; Walter S Renier; Frank Buntinx; Jan F C Glatz; Geert-Jan Dinant
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Chest discomfort at night and risk of acute coronary syndrome: cross-sectional study of telephone conversations.

Authors:  Loes T Wouters; Dorien L Zwart; Daphne C Erkelens; Noël S Cheung; Esther de Groot; Roger A Damoiseaux; Arno W Hoes; Frans H Rutten
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  The conundrum of acute chest pain in general practice: a nationwide survey in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Ralf Harskamp; Petra van Peet; Jettie Bont; Suzanne Ligthart; Wim Lucassen; Henk van Weert
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-11-28

6.  Chest pain in general practice: a systematic review of prediction rules.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Simone C Laeven; Jelle Cl Himmelreich; Wim A M Lucassen; Henk C P M van Weert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Optimisation of telephone triage of callers with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiovascular disease in out-of-hours primary care: observational design of the Safety First study.

Authors:  Daphne Ca Erkelens; Loes Tcm Wouters; Dorien Lm Zwart; Roger Amj Damoiseaux; Esther De Groot; Arno W Hoes; Frans H Rutten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Are there gender disparities in symptom presentation or triage of patients with chest discomfort at primary care out-of-hours services? An observational study.

Authors:  Manon G van der Meer; Yolande Appelman; Karlijn H G Rutten; Yolanda van der Graaf; Hendrik M Nathoe; Pieter A Doevendans; Michelle Smit; Emmy Verheij; Anne Botermans; Frans H Rutten
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Coronary artery disease prediction in women and men using chest pain characteristics and risk factors: an observational study in outpatient clinics.

Authors:  Leonard Hofstra; Hester M den Ruijter; Floor Groepenhoff; Anouk L M Eikendal; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Sophie Heleen Bots; Roxana Menken; Igor I Tulevski; Aernout G Somsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Chest Pain, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk, and Cardiology Referral in Primary Care.

Authors:  Vishaal Buch; Hayley Ralph; Joanne Salas; Paul J Hauptman; Dawn Davis; Jeffrey F Scherrer
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.