Joseph F Walker1, Ya Yang2, Michael J Moore3, Jessica Mikenas3, Alfonso Timoneda4, Samuel F Brockington4, Stephen A Smith1. 1. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 USA jfwalker@umich.edu eebsmith@umich.edu. 2. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 USA. 3. Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, Ohio 44074-1097 USA. 4. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK.
Abstract
PREMISE OF STUDY: The carnivorous members of the large, hyperdiverse Caryophyllales (e.g., Venus flytrap, sundews, and Nepenthes pitcher plants) represent perhaps the oldest and most diverse lineage of carnivorous plants. However, despite numerous studies seeking to elucidate their evolutionary relationships, the early-diverging relationships remain unresolved. METHODS: To explore the utility of phylogenomic data sets for resolving relationships among the carnivorous Caryophyllales, we sequenced 10 transcriptomes, including all the carnivorous genera except those in the rare West African liana family Dioncophyllaceae. We used a variety of methods to infer the species tree, examine gene tree conflict, and infer paleopolyploidy events. KEY RESULTS: Phylogenomic analyses supported the monophyly of the carnivorous Caryophyllales, with a crown age of 68-83 million years. In contrast to previous analyses, we recovered the remaining noncore Caryophyllales as nonmonophyletic, although the node supporting this relationship contained a significant amount of gene tree discordance. We present evidence that the clade contains at least seven independent paleopolyploidy events, previously unresolved nodes from the literature have high levels of gene tree conflict, and taxon sampling influences topology even in a phylogenomic data set, regardless of the use of coalescent or supermatrix methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the importance of carefully considering gene tree conflict and taxon sampling in phylogenomic analyses. Moreover, they provide a remarkable example of the propensity for paleopolyploidy in angiosperms, with at least seven such events in a clade of less than 2500 species.
PREMISE OF STUDY: The carnivorous members of the large, hyperdiverse Caryophyllales (e.g., Venus flytrap, sundews, and Nepenthes pitcher plants) represent perhaps the oldest and most diverse lineage of carnivorous plants. However, despite numerous studies seeking to elucidate their evolutionary relationships, the early-diverging relationships remain unresolved. METHODS: To explore the utility of phylogenomic data sets for resolving relationships among the carnivorous Caryophyllales, we sequenced 10 transcriptomes, including all the carnivorous genera except those in the rare West African liana family Dioncophyllaceae. We used a variety of methods to infer the species tree, examine gene tree conflict, and infer paleopolyploidy events. KEY RESULTS: Phylogenomic analyses supported the monophyly of the carnivorous Caryophyllales, with a crown age of 68-83 million years. In contrast to previous analyses, we recovered the remaining noncore Caryophyllales as nonmonophyletic, although the node supporting this relationship contained a significant amount of gene tree discordance. We present evidence that the clade contains at least seven independent paleopolyploidy events, previously unresolved nodes from the literature have high levels of gene tree conflict, and taxon sampling influences topology even in a phylogenomic data set, regardless of the use of coalescent or supermatrix methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the importance of carefully considering gene tree conflict and taxon sampling in phylogenomic analyses. Moreover, they provide a remarkable example of the propensity for paleopolyploidy in angiosperms, with at least seven such events in a clade of less than 2500 species.
Authors: Gregory W Stull; Xiao-Jian Qu; Caroline Parins-Fukuchi; Ying-Ying Yang; Jun-Bo Yang; Zhi-Yun Yang; Yi Hu; Hong Ma; Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis; De-Zhu Li; Stephen A Smith; Ting-Shuang Yi Journal: Nat Plants Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 15.793
Authors: Alexander L Davis; Matthew H Babb; Matthew C Lowe; Adam T Yeh; Brandon T Lee; Christopher H Martin Journal: Am Nat Date: 2018-12-28 Impact factor: 4.367
Authors: Yang Liu; Matthew G Johnson; Cymon J Cox; Rafael Medina; Nicolas Devos; Alain Vanderpoorten; Lars Hedenäs; Neil E Bell; James R Shevock; Blanka Aguero; Dietmar Quandt; Norman J Wickett; A Jonathan Shaw; Bernard Goffinet Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Adam G Ciezarek; Owen G Osborne; Oliver N Shipley; Edward J Brooks; Sean R Tracey; Jaime D McAllister; Luke D Gardner; Michael J E Sternberg; Barbara Block; Vincent Savolainen Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 16.240