Literature DB >> 28633707

Qualitative analysis of biological tuberculosis samples by an electronic nose-based artificial neural network.

E I Mohamed1, M A Mohamed2, M H Moustafa1, S M Abdel-Mageed3, A M Moro4, A I Baess5, S M El-Kholy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To apply an e-nose system for monitoring headspace volatiles in biological samples from Egyptian patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and healthy controls (HCs) and compare them with standard sputum analysis.
DESIGN: The study population comprised 260 (140 males, 120 females) newly diagnosed TB patients and 240 (120 males, 120 females) HCs matched by age and socio-economic level admitted to hospitals specialising in chest diseases in Alexandria, Behera, Giza and Damietta Governorates, Egypt. Participants provided a history of TB and underwent clinical examinations, chest X-ray, and microbiological and e-nose analyses. Biological samples (blood, breath, sputum and urine) were collected. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Being a confirmed TB patient was directly proportional to e-nose 10-sensor responses. Principal component analysis clusters showed a clear distinction between TB and HC groups, with variances of 93%, 85%, 75% and 95% for blood, breath, sputum and urine samples, respectively. Overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the artificial neural network (ANN) analysis for classifying samples were >99%. The e-nose successfully distinguished TB patients from HC participants for all measured biological samples with great precision. With urine samples gaining broader acceptance for clinical diagnosis, an e-nose-based ANN can be a very useful tool for low-cost mass screening and early detection of TB patients in developing countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28633707     DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis        ISSN: 1027-3719            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of an electronic nose in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis among patients with suspected tuberculosis.

Authors:  Antonia M I Saktiawati; Ymkje Stienstra; Yanri W Subronto; Ning Rintiswati; Jan-Willem Gerritsen; Henny Oord; Onno W Akkerman; Tjip S van der Werf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Diagnosis of tuberculosis through breath test: A systematic review.

Authors:  Antonia M I Saktiawati; David Dwi Putera; Althaf Setyawan; Yodi Mahendradhata; Tjip S van der Werf
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Breath can discriminate tuberculosis from other lower respiratory illness in children.

Authors:  Lili Kang; Lesley Workman; Heather J Zar; Jane E Hill; Carly A Bobak; Lindy Bateman; Mohammad S Khan; Margaretha Prins; Lloyd May; Flavio A Franchina; Cynthia Baard; Mark P Nicol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology.

Authors:  I G van der Sar; N Wijbenga; M E Hellemons; C C Moor; G Nakshbandi; J G J V Aerts; O C Manintveld; M S Wijsenbeek
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-09-17

Review 5.  Trends in the Development of Electronic Noses Based on Carbon Nanotubes Chemiresistors for Breathomics.

Authors:  Sonia Freddi; Luigi Sangaletti
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 6.  Review and Updates on the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Lin Ai; Xiaochen Wang; Ziyong Sun; Feng Wang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence and the future of global health.

Authors:  Nina Schwalbe; Brian Wahl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.