Beatriz Olaya1,2,3, Maria Victoria Moneta1,2,3, Joan Doménech-Abella1,2, Marta Miret3,4,5, Ivet Bayes1,2, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos3,4,5, Josep Maria Haro1,2,3. 1. Research, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain. 2. Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain. 3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
Background: This study sought to determine the association between levels of physical activity and mobility difficulties and time to death while accounting for the effect of several confounders. We also examined the possible interaction between them and how various daily-life mobility difficulties could predict all-cause mortality. Methods: A nationally representative sample of 2,074 noninstitutionalized adults aged 60 years and older was analyzed. Vital status over a 3-year follow-up period was ascertained through national registers or by asking participants' relatives. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were stratified by levels of physical activity and mobility difficulties. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models (by age, gender, marital status, years of education, multimorbidity, tobacco and alcohol consumption, depression, and memory function) were calculated, and interactions between the predictors and the covariates were explored. Results: There was a dose-gradient effect of physical activity on time to death, with high levels associated with a 51% lower risk of dying, compared with moderate physical activity. Each unit increase in mobility functioning was associated with a 2% drop in mortality. Difficulties in standing for long periods, getting where one wants to go or extending arms to reach objects, were also found to be strong predictors of all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Our results confirm the importance of older adults practicing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. The assessment of self-reported difficulties in daily-life mobility activities, such as standing for long periods or not being able to move around, could be used in health settings as a screening for mortality risk.
Background: This study sought to determine the association between levels of physical activity and mobility difficulties and time to death while accounting for the effect of several confounders. We also examined the possible interaction between them and how various daily-life mobility difficulties could predict all-cause mortality. Methods: A nationally representative sample of 2,074 noninstitutionalized adults aged 60 years and older was analyzed. Vital status over a 3-year follow-up period was ascertained through national registers or by asking participants' relatives. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were stratified by levels of physical activity and mobility difficulties. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models (by age, gender, marital status, years of education, multimorbidity, tobacco and alcohol consumption, depression, and memory function) were calculated, and interactions between the predictors and the covariates were explored. Results: There was a dose-gradient effect of physical activity on time to death, with high levels associated with a 51% lower risk of dying, compared with moderate physical activity. Each unit increase in mobility functioning was associated with a 2% drop in mortality. Difficulties in standing for long periods, getting where one wants to go or extending arms to reach objects, were also found to be strong predictors of all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Our results confirm the importance of older adults practicing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. The assessment of self-reported difficulties in daily-life mobility activities, such as standing for long periods or not being able to move around, could be used in health settings as a screening for mortality risk.
Authors: Melissa Y Wei; Mohammed U Kabeto; Andrzej T Galecki; Kenneth M Langa Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Michael J LaMonte; Kelly R Evenson; Cynthia A Thomson; Shirley A Beresford; Mathilda C Coday; Todd M Manini; Wenjun Li; Andrea Z LaCroix Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sara Higueras-Fresnillo; Verónica Cabanas-Sánchez; Esther García-Esquinas; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; David Martinez-Gomez Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Murad H Taani; Scott J Strath; Rachel Schiffman; Michael Fendrich; Amy Harley; Chi C Cho; Yosuke Yamada; Christine R Kovach Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Arthur Tarricone; Allen Gee; Simon Chen; Karla De La Mata; Justin Muser; Wayne Axman; Prakash Krishnan; Vinayak Perake Journal: Foot Ankle Orthop Date: 2022-07-26