Literature DB >> 28633381

Robust Tests for Additive Gene-Environment Interaction in Case-Control Studies Using Gene-Environment Independence.

Gang Liu1, Bhramar Mukherjee1, Seunggeun Lee1, Alice W Lee2, Anna H Wu2, Elisa V Bandera3, Allan Jensen4, Mary Anne Rossing5,6, Kirsten B Moysich7, Jenny Chang-Claude8,9, Jennifer A Doherty10, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj11, Lambertus Kiemeney12, Simon A Gayther2, Francesmary Modugno13,14,15, Leon Massuger16, Ellen L Goode17, Brooke L Fridley18, Kathryn L Terry19,20, Daniel W Cramer19,20, Susan J Ramus21,22, Hoda Anton-Culver23, Argyrios Ziogas23, Jonathan P Tyrer24, Joellen M Schildkraut25, Susanne K Kjaer4,26, Penelope M Webb27, Roberta B Ness28, Usha Menon11, Andrew Berchuck29, Paul D Pharoah24,30, Harvey Risch31, Celeste Leigh Pearce2,32.   

Abstract

There have been recent proposals advocating the use of additive gene-environment interaction instead of the widely used multiplicative scale, as a more relevant public health measure. Using gene-environment independence enhances statistical power for testing multiplicative interaction in case-control studies. However, under departure from this assumption, substantial bias in the estimates and inflated type I error in the corresponding tests can occur. In this paper, we extend the empirical Bayes (EB) approach previously developed for multiplicative interaction, which trades off between bias and efficiency in a data-adaptive way, to the additive scale. An EB estimator of the relative excess risk due to interaction is derived, and the corresponding Wald test is proposed with a general regression setting under a retrospective likelihood framework. We study the impact of gene-environment association on the resultant test with case-control data. Our simulation studies suggest that the EB approach uses the gene-environment independence assumption in a data-adaptive way and provides a gain in power compared with the standard logistic regression analysis and better control of type I error when compared with the analysis assuming gene-environment independence. We illustrate the methods with data from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias-variance tradeoff; effect modification; empirical Bayes estimation; genetic risk score; relative excess risk; shrinkage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28633381      PMCID: PMC5860584          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  58 in total

1.  Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Bhramar Mukherjee; Malay Ghosh; Stephen Gruber; Victor Moreno
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  On the estimation of additive interaction by use of the four-by-two table and beyond.

Authors:  Guang Yong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Tests for gene-environment interaction from case-control data: a novel study of type I error, power and designs.

Authors:  Bhramar Mukherjee; Jaeil Ahn; Stephen B Gruber; Gad Rennert; Victor Moreno; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Efficient two-step testing of gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Lewinger; John L Morrison; Duncan C Thomas; Cassandra E Murcray; David V Conti; Dalin Li; W James Gauderman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies.

Authors:  W W Piegorsch; C R Weinberg; J A Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Association of two common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CYP19A1 locus and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Marc T Goodman; Galina Lurie; Pamela J Thompson; Katharine E McDuffie; Michael E Carney
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.678

7.  Reproductive factors and epithelial ovarian cancer risk by histologic type: a multiethnic case-control study.

Authors:  Ko-Hui Tung; Marc T Goodman; Anna H Wu; Katharine McDuffie; Lynne R Wilkens; Laurence N Kolonel; Abraham M Y Nomura; Keith Y Terada; Michael E Carney; Leslie H Sobin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Talcum powder, chronic pelvic inflammation and NSAIDs in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Melissa A Merritt; Adèle C Green; Christina M Nagle; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Recruitment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients proved challenging in a multicentre biobanking study.

Authors:  Nyaladzi Balogun; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Eva L Wozniak; Anita Lim; Andy Ryan; Susan J Ramus; Jeremy Ford; Matthew Burnell; Martin Widschwendter; Sue F Gessler; Simon A Gayther; Ian J Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Genome-wide diet-gene interaction analyses for risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jane C Figueiredo; Li Hsu; Carolyn M Hutter; Yi Lin; Peter T Campbell; John A Baron; Sonja I Berndt; Shuo Jiao; Graham Casey; Barbara Fortini; Andrew T Chan; Michelle Cotterchio; Mathieu Lemire; Steven Gallinger; Tabitha A Harrison; Loic Le Marchand; Polly A Newcomb; Martha L Slattery; Bette J Caan; Christopher S Carlson; Brent W Zanke; Stephanie A Rosse; Hermann Brenner; Edward L Giovannucci; Kana Wu; Jenny Chang-Claude; Stephen J Chanock; Keith R Curtis; David Duggan; Jian Gong; Robert W Haile; Richard B Hayes; Michael Hoffmeister; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Laurence N Kolonel; Conghui Qu; Anja Rudolph; Robert E Schoen; Fredrick R Schumacher; Daniela Seminara; Deanna L Stelling; Stephen N Thibodeau; Mark Thornquist; Greg S Warnick; Brian E Henderson; Cornelia M Ulrich; W James Gauderman; John D Potter; Emily White; Ulrike Peters
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  6 in total

1.  A general approach to detect gene (G)-environment (E) additive interaction leveraging G-E independence in case-control studies.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Xu Shi; Benedict H W Wong; Tamar Sofer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Estimating Additive Interaction Effect in Stratified Two-Phase Case-Control Design.

Authors:  Ai Ni; Jaya M Satagopan
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 3.  Impact of Gene-Environment Interactions on Cancer Development.

Authors:  Ariane Mbemi; Sunali Khanna; Sylvianne Njiki; Clement G Yedjou; Paul B Tchounwou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A comprehensive gene-environment interaction analysis in Ovarian Cancer using genome-wide significant common variants.

Authors:  Sehee Kim; Miao Wang; Jonathan P Tyrer; Allan Jensen; Ashley Wiensch; Gang Liu; Alice W Lee; Roberta B Ness; Maxwell Salvatore; Shelley S Tworoger; Alice S Whittemore; Hoda Anton-Culver; Weiva Sieh; Sara H Olson; Andrew Berchuck; Ellen L Goode; Marc T Goodman; Jennifer Anne Doherty; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Mary Anne Rossing; Penelope M Webb; Graham G Giles; Kathryn L Terry; Argyrios Ziogas; Renée T Fortner; Usha Menon; Simon A Gayther; Anna H Wu; Honglin Song; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Elisa V Bandera; Linda S Cook; Daniel W Cramer; Roger L Milne; Stacey J Winham; Susanne K Kjaer; Francesmary Modugno; Pamela J Thompson; Jenny Chang-Claude; Holly R Harris; Joellen M Schildkraut; Nhu D Le; Nico Wentzensen; Britton Trabert; Estrid Høgdall; David Huntsman; Malcolm C Pike; Paul D P Pharoah; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  A Likelihood Ratio Test for Gene-Environment Interaction Based on the Trend Effect of Genotype Under an Additive Risk Model Using the Gene-Environment Independence Assumption.

Authors:  Matthieu de Rochemonteix; Valerio Napolioni; Nilotpal Sanyal; Michaël E Belloy; Neil E Caporaso; Maria T Landi; Michael D Greicius; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Summer S Han
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  A Robust Test for Additive Gene-Environment Interaction Under the Trend Effect of Genotype Using an Empirical Bayes-Type Shrinkage Estimator.

Authors:  Nilotpal Sanyal; Valerio Napolioni; Matthieu de Rochemonteix; Michaël E Belloy; Neil E Caporaso; Maria Teresa Landi; Michael D Greicius; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Summer S Han
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.