Mark H Wilcox1, Harblas Ahir2, John E Coia3, Andrew Dodgson4, Susan Hopkins5, Martin J Llewelyn6, Chris Settle7, Susan Mclain-Smith8, Stephen W Marcella9. 1. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited, Hoddesdon, UK. 3. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK. 4. Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. 5. Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 6. Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. 7. City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK. 8. pH Associates, Marlow, UK. 9. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Abstract
Objectives: Data quantifying outcomes of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) are lacking. We sought to determine the UK hospital resource use and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with rCDI hospitalizations. Patients and methods: A non-interventional study in six UK acute hospitals collected retrospective clinical and resource use data from medical records of 64 adults hospitalized for rCDI and 64 matched inpatient controls with a first episode only (f)CDI. Patients were observed from the index event (date rCDI/fCDI confirmed) for 28 days (or death, if sooner); UK-specific reference costs were applied. HRQoL was assessed prospectively in a separate cohort of 30 patients hospitalized with CDI, who completed the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire during their illness. Results: The median total management cost (post-index) was £7539 and £6294 for rCDI and fCDI, respectively (cost difference, P = 0.075); median length of stay was 21 days and 15.5 days, respectively (P = 0.269). The median cost difference between matched rCDI and fCDI cases was £689 (IQR=£1873-£3954). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest median costs (£8542/patient) in severe rCDI cases. CDI management costs were driven primarily by hospital length of stay, which accounted for >85% of costs in both groups. Mean EQ-5D index values were 46% lower in CDI patients compared with UK population values (0.42 and 0.78, respectively); EQ visual analogue scale scores were 38% lower (47.82 and 77.3, respectively). Conclusions: CDI has considerable impact on patients and healthcare resources. This multicentre study provides a contemporaneous estimate of the real-world UK costs associated with rCDI management, which are substantial and comparable to fCDI costs.
Objectives: Data quantifying outcomes of recurrent Clostridium difficileinfection (rCDI) are lacking. We sought to determine the UK hospital resource use and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with rCDI hospitalizations. Patients and methods: A non-interventional study in six UK acute hospitals collected retrospective clinical and resource use data from medical records of 64 adults hospitalized for rCDI and 64 matched inpatient controls with a first episode only (f)CDI. Patients were observed from the index event (date rCDI/fCDI confirmed) for 28 days (or death, if sooner); UK-specific reference costs were applied. HRQoL was assessed prospectively in a separate cohort of 30 patients hospitalized with CDI, who completed the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire during their illness. Results: The median total management cost (post-index) was £7539 and £6294 for rCDI and fCDI, respectively (cost difference, P = 0.075); median length of stay was 21 days and 15.5 days, respectively (P = 0.269). The median cost difference between matched rCDI and fCDI cases was £689 (IQR=£1873-£3954). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest median costs (£8542/patient) in severe rCDI cases. CDI management costs were driven primarily by hospital length of stay, which accounted for >85% of costs in both groups. Mean EQ-5D index values were 46% lower in CDI patients compared with UK population values (0.42 and 0.78, respectively); EQ visual analogue scale scores were 38% lower (47.82 and 77.3, respectively). Conclusions: CDI has considerable impact on patients and healthcare resources. This multicentre study provides a contemporaneous estimate of the real-world UK costs associated with rCDI management, which are substantial and comparable to fCDI costs.
Authors: Frédéric Barbut; Tatiana Galperine; Philippe Vanhems; Alban Le Monnier; Bernard Durand-Gasselin; Frédérique Canis; Viviane Jeanbat; Anne Duburcq; Sarah Alami; Caroline Bensoussan; Francis Fagnani Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Emilio Bouza; Oliver A Cornely; Antonio Ramos-Martinez; Robert Plesniak; Misoo C Ellison; Mary E Hanson; Mary Beth Dorr Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-06 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: George H Talbot; Leah Kleinman; Evan Davies; Elke Hunsche; Dennis Revicki; Laurie Roberts; Daniel Rosenberg; Carl Erik Nord Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2019-05-03 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: E Bouza; J M Aguado; L Alcalá; B Almirante; P Alonso-Fernández; M Borges; J Cobo; J Guardiola; J P Horcajada; E Maseda; J Mensa; N Merchante; P Muñoz; J L Pérez Sáenz; M Pujol; E Reigadas; M Salavert; J Barberán Journal: Rev Esp Quimioter Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 1.553