Literature DB >> 28632867

Effect of an Internet-Based Program on Weight Loss for Low-Income Postpartum Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Suzanne Phelan1, Todd Hagobian1, Anna Brannen1, Karen E Hatley2, Andrew Schaffner1, Karen Muñoz-Christian1, Deborah F Tate2.   

Abstract

Importance: Postpartum weight retention increases lifetime risk of obesity and related morbidity. Few effective interventions exist for multicultural, low-income women. Objective: To test whether an internet-based weight loss program in addition to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC program) for low-income postpartum women could produce greater weight loss than the WIC program alone over 12 months. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 12-month, cluster randomized, assessor-blind, clinical trial enrolling 371 adult postpartum women at 12 clinics in WIC programs from the California central coast between July 2011 and May 2015 with data collection completed in May 2016. Interventions: Clinics were randomized to the WIC program (standard care group) or the WIC program plus a 12-month primarily internet-based weight loss program (intervention group), including a website with weekly lessons, web diary, instructional videos, computerized feedback, text messages, and monthly face-to-face groups at the WIC clinics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was weight change over 12 months, based on measurements at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included proportion returning to preconception weight and changes in physical activity and diet.
Results: Participants included 371 women (mean age, 28.1 years; Hispanic, 81.6%; mean weight above prepregnancy weight, 7.8 kg; mean months post partum, 5.2 months) randomized to the intervention group (n = 174) or standard care group (n = 197); 89.2% of participants completed the study. The intervention group produced greater mean 12-month weight loss compared with the standard care group (3.2 kg in the intervention group vs 0.9 kg in standard care group, P < .001; difference, 2.3 kg (95% CI, 1.1 to 3.5). More participants in the intervention group than the standard care group returned to preconception weight by 12 months (32.8% in the intervention group vs 18.6% in the standard care group, P < .001; difference, 14.2 percentage points [95% CI, 4.7 to 23.5]). The intervention group and standard care group did not significantly differ in 12-month changes in physical activity (mean [95% CI]: -7.8 min/d [-16.1 to 0.4] in the intervention group vs -7.2 min/d [-14.6 to 0.3] in the standard care group; difference, -0.7 min/d [95% CI, -42.0 to 10.6], P = .76), calorie intake (mean [95% CI]: -298 kcal/d [-423 to -174] in the intervention group vs -144 kcal/d [-257 to -32] in the standard care group; difference, -154 kcal/d [-325 to 17], P = .06), or incidences of injury (16 in the intervention group vs 16 in the standard care group) or low breastmilk supply from baseline to month 6 (21 of 61 participants in the intervention group vs 23 of 72 participants in the standard care group) and from month 6 to 12 (13 of 32 participants in the intervention group vs 14 of 37 participants in the standard care group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among low-income postpartum women, an internet-based weight loss program in addition to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC program) compared with the WIC program alone resulted in a statistically significant greater weight loss over 12 months. Further research is needed to determine program and cost-effectiveness as part of the WIC program. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01408147.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28632867      PMCID: PMC5815021          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.7119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  33 in total

1.  Using technology to promote postpartum weight loss in urban, low-income mothers: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sharon J Herring; Jane F Cruice; Gary G Bennett; Adam Davey; Gary D Foster
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 2.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

3.  Lessons learned from the mothers' overweight management study in 4 West Virginia WIC offices.

Authors:  Debra Krummel; Elizabeth Semmens; Anne M MacBride; Brenda Fisher
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Impact of perinatal weight change on long-term obesity and obesity-related illnesses.

Authors:  Brenda L Rooney; Charles W Schauberger; Michelle A Mathiason
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: data from the MRC Trial of the Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community.

Authors:  Liam Smeeth; Edmond Siu-Woon Ng
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-08

7.  How accurately do pregnant adolescents estimate their weight prior to pregnancy?

Authors:  C Stevens-Simon; E R McAnarney; M P Coulter
Journal:  J Adolesc Health Care       Date:  1986-07

8.  Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes): design and methods for a clinical trial of weight loss for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Donna H Ryan; Mark A Espeland; Gary D Foster; Steven M Haffner; Van S Hubbard; Karen C Johnson; Steven E Kahn; William C Knowler; Susan Z Yanovski
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2003-10

9.  Excess gains in weight and waist circumference associated with childbearing: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA).

Authors:  E P Gunderson; M A Murtaugh; C E Lewis; C P Quesenberry; D S West; S Sidney
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2004-04

10.  Internet-based behavioral interventions for obesity: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Gian Mauro Manzoni; Francesco Pagnini; Stefania Corti; Enrico Molinari; Gianluca Castelnuovo
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2011-03-04
View more
  39 in total

1.  Lessons Learned From a Feasibility Study Delivered in 2 WIC Sites to Promote Physical Activity Among Pregnant Latinas.

Authors:  Sandra H Soto; Stephanie Sanz; Kathleen M Merchant; Jeanne F Nichols; Elva M Arredondo
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Targeting the postpartum period to promote weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jodie M Dodd; Andrea R Deussen; Cecelia M O'Brien; Danielle A J M Schoenaker; Amanda Poprzeczny; Adrienne Gordon; Suzanne Phelan
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.110

3.  Applying behavior change techniques to weight management during pregnancy: Impact on perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Julie K Phillips; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Impact of an Internet-Based Lifestyle Intervention on Behavioral and Psychosocial Factors During Postpartum Weight Loss.

Authors:  Kelly A Bennion; Deborah Tate; Karen Muñoz-Christian; Suzanne Phelan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Does Partial Meal Replacement During Pregnancy Reduce 12-Month Postpartum Weight Retention?

Authors:  Suzanne Phelan; Rena R Wing; Anna Brannen; Angelica McHugh; Todd Hagobian; Andrew Schaffner; Elissa Jelalian; Chantelle N Hart; Theresa O Scholl; Karen Muñoz-Christian; Elaine Yin; Maureen G Phipps; Sarah Keadle; Barbara Abrams
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Feasibility of using a peer coach to deliver a behavioral intervention for promoting postpartum weight loss in Black and Latina mothers.

Authors:  Sharon J Herring; Veronica M Bersani; Christine Santoro; Saleemah J McNeil; Linda M Kilby; Brooke Bailer
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Feasibility and Acceptability of Delivering a Postpartum Weight Loss Intervention via Facebook: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Molly E Waring; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Jessica Oleski; Rui S Xiao; Julie A Mulcahy; Christine N May; Sherry L Pagoto
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.045

8.  Cancer-Related Internet Use and Online Social Networking Among Patients in an Early-Phase Clinical Trials Clinic at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Goldy C George; Adrianna Buford; Kenneth Hess; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Ralph Zinner; Vivek Subbiah; Christina Hinojosa; Charles S Cleeland; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Elmer V Bernstam; David S Hong
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

Review 9.  Intervention strategies to improve nutrition and health behaviours before conception.

Authors:  Mary Barker; Stephan U Dombrowski; Tim Colbourn; Caroline H D Fall; Natasha M Kriznik; Wendy T Lawrence; Shane A Norris; Gloria Ngaiza; Dilisha Patel; Jolene Skordis-Worrall; Falko F Sniehotta; Régine Steegers-Theunissen; Christina Vogel; Kathryn Woods-Townsend; Judith Stephenson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Before the beginning: nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health.

Authors:  Judith Stephenson; Nicola Heslehurst; Jennifer Hall; Danielle A J M Schoenaker; Jayne Hutchinson; Janet E Cade; Lucilla Poston; Geraldine Barrett; Sarah R Crozier; Mary Barker; Kalyanaraman Kumaran; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Janis Baird; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.