Literature DB >> 28632594

Outcome of Early and Late Diagnosed Essex-Lopresti Injury.

Marc Schnetzke1, Felix Porschke, Karin Hoppe, Stefan Studier-Fischer, Paul-Alfred Gruetzner, Thorsten Guehring.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes in a large series of Essex-Lopresti injuries (ELIs) and to compare patients with early and late diagnoses.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with an ELI (average age and standard deviation [SD], 46 ± 10 years) who were followed for a minimum of 2 years were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to whether the ELI had been diagnosed early (on the day of the injury) or late (>4 weeks after the radial head injury). Acute treatment of early-diagnosed ELI included temporary stabilization of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) by Kirschner wires with the forearm in supination for 6 weeks. Clinical outcomes were assessed on the basis of the range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Mayo Wrist Score (MWS), visual analog scale (VAS) score for wrist and elbow pain, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.
RESULTS: The ELI was diagnosed on the day of the injury in 16 patients (52%; the early group) and late (at a mean of 7 ± 7 months; range, 1 to 24 months) in 15 (48%; the late group). After a mean duration of follow-up of 5.3 ± 3.0 years (range, 2.0 to 13.1 years), patients with an early diagnosed ELI had significantly better clinical outcomes, compared with those with a late diagnosis, with regard to the MEPS (91.3 ± 8.7 versus 74.7 ± 15.3, p = 0.003), MWS (81.3 ± 16.5 versus 66.3 ± 17.6, p = 0.019), DASH score (12.5 ± 8.7 versus 45.3 ± 23.5, p = 0.001), VAS elbow pain score (0.7 ± 1.1 versus 3.3 ± 2.1, p = 0.001), and VAS wrist pain score (0.9 ± 1.2 versus 3.9 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). The ranges of motion of the elbow and wrist did not differ significantly between the early and late groups (p > 0.05). A significantly lower percentage of patients had complications or subsequent surgical procedures in the early than in the late group (38% [6 of 16] versus 93% [14 of 15], p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis of an ELI with temporary stabilization of the DRUJ leads to satisfactory clinical mid-term results, whereas late diagnosis of an ELI is associated with a deteriorated outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28632594     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  An uncommon variant of the Essex-Lopresti injury.

Authors:  Mohamed Ali Kedous; Ahmed Msakni; Wael Chebbi; Mourad Zaraa; Mondher Mbarek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Chronic Essex-Lopresti injury: a systematic review of current treatment options.

Authors:  Stefano Artiaco; Federico Fusini; Giulia Colzani; Alessandro Massè; Bruno Battiston
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Results of radial head prostheses implanted during Essex-Lopresti syndrome in multicentric study.

Authors:  Hugo Barret; Luc Favard; Pierre Mansat; Matthias Winter; Philippe Clavert; François Sirveaux; Michel Chammas; Bertrand Coulet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The Serially-Operated Essex-Lopresti Injury: Long-Term Outcomes in a Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Svenna H W L Verhiel; Sezai Özkan; Christopher G Langhammer; Neal C Chen
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2020-01-16

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of acute Essex-Lopresti injury: focus on terminology and review of literature.

Authors:  Maurizio Fontana; Marco Cavallo; Graziano Bettelli; Roberto Rotini
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Fracture-dislocations of the forearm joint: a systematic review of the literature and a comprehensive locker-based classification system.

Authors:  Stefano Artiaco; Federico Fusini; Arman Sard; Elisa Dutto; Alessandro Massè; Bruno Battiston
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2020-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.