Literature DB >> 2863220

Working ability and exercise tolerance during treatment of a mild hypertension. I. Comparison between a beta-adreno-receptor blocking drug and a calcium antagonist.

K Lange Andersen, W Piatkowski, K A Green, W Ottmann.   

Abstract

A randomized cross-over trial was undertaken on 21 occupationally active persons who had a stable mild or moderate hypertension with the purpose of comparing the effect of a beta-adreno-receptor blocking agent (atenolol) with that of a calcium channel inhibitor (nifedipine). The doses recommended by the manufactures were used. Atenolol (100 mg) given once a day resulted in a marked hypotensive effect at rest as well as during exercise, the compliance was satisfactory, and the hemodynamic changes were not reflected in unfavourable side effects during muscular exercise or in the subjects own personal assessment of fatigue during the exercise tests which ranged in energy expenditure from about three to six times the resting level. However, unfavourable, modest side effects occurred in two subjects during atenolol medication to the extent that they wanted to terminate the study. Nifedipine therapy with doses of 10 mg, three times a day, resulted in a modest, but statistically insignificant reduction in arterial blood pressure, which contrasts with previous published results. It is suggested that the modest effect is caused or related to the poor compliance and a daily dose that was quantitatively too small. No unfavourable side effects were seen during muscular efforts when the subjects were on nifedipine medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2863220     DOI: 10.1007/bf00380699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  10 in total

1.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

2.  Adrenergic control of lipid metabolism.

Authors:  U Smith
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1983

3.  beta-adrenoceptor blockade and physical activity: cardiovascular and metabolic aspects.

Authors:  G Koch; I W Franz; A Gubba; F W Lohmann
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1983

4.  Antihypertensive effect of cardiovascular Ca2+-antagonist in hypertensive patients in the absence and presence of beta-adrenergic blockade.

Authors:  K Aoki; S Kondo; A Mochizuki; T Yoshida; S Kato; K Kato; K Takikawa
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Comparative study of atenolol, metoprolol, metoprolol durules, and slow-release oxprenolol in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R G Wilcox; J R Hampton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-11

Review 6.  Hemodynamic changes after acute and long-term combined alpha--beta-adrenoceptor blockade with labetalol as compared with beta-receptor blockade.

Authors:  G Koch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Nifedipine or verapamil as sole treatment of hypertension. An intraarterial study.

Authors:  B A Gould; R S Hornung; S Mann; V B Subramanian; E B Raftery
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Pharmacokinetic studies of nifedipine tablet. Correlation with antihypertensive effects.

Authors:  A M Taburet; E Singlas; J N Colin; O Banzet; M Thibonnier; P Corvol
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Effect of propranolol and prazosin on blood lipids. The Oslo Study.

Authors:  P Leren; P O Foss; A Helgeland; I Hjermann; I Holme; P G Lund-Larsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-07-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Calcium blockade as a therapeutic principle in arterial hypertension. Clinical aspects and experimental studies on isolated vessels from spontaneously hypertensive rats and normotensive man.

Authors:  O L Pedersen
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh)       Date:  1981
  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Have angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors improved therapy of hypertension?].

Authors:  K H Rahn
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1988-09-15

2.  Working ability and exercise tolerance during treatment of mild hypertension. II. A comparison between atenolol and prazosin medication.

Authors:  K Lange Andersen; W Ottmann; W Piatkowski; K A Green
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Patient compliance and therapeutic coverage: comparison of amlodipine and slow release nifedipine in the treatment of hypertension. The Belgian Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  J M Detry; P Block; G De Backer; J P Degaute
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.