Literature DB >> 28631981

Patient-centered Radiology: Where Are We, Where Do We Want to Be, and How Do We Get There?

Jennifer L Kemp1, Mary C Mahoney1, Vincent P Mathews1, Max Wintermark1, Judy Yee1, Stephen D Brown1.   

Abstract

Purpose The objectives of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Patient-Centered Radiology Steering Committee survey were to (a) assess RSNA members' general attitudes and experiences concerning patient-centered radiology, with specific attention paid to radiologist-to-patient communication; (b) examine the members' barriers to communicating more directly with patients; and (c) explore their perceptions of how such barriers can be overcome. Materials and Methods A total of 5999 radiologists were invited by e-mail to complete an anonymous electronic survey developed by the Steering Committee and the RSNA Department of Research. Participants were asked to identify aspects of patient-centered care important to their practice, report on their interactions with patients, and share their opinions on radiologist-patient communication. Statistical analyses were performed by using the χ2 test and analysis of variance. Results The response rate was 12% (n = 694, 109 invitations were undeliverable). Most respondents (89%, 611 of 684) agreed that promoting awareness of the role of radiology in patients' overall health care is important to how they practice. The majority (73%, 421 of 575) reported that time or workload frequently prevented them from communicating directly with patients. The majority (74%, 423 of 572) reported that a personal sense of satisfaction was likely to motivate them to communicate more directly with patients, but many commented that changes to reimbursement and compensation would help them communicate with patients more directly. Conclusion Many radiologists support the concept of communicating more directly with patients but report they are constrained by time or workload. Changes to reimbursement schemes may help mitigate these barriers to one crucial aspect of patient-centered care. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28631981     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating Completeness of a Radiology Glossary Using Iterative Refinement.

Authors:  Peter Y W Chan; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Does Patient Satisfaction Drive Volumes in Outpatient Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Authors:  Amna A Ajam; Elvira V Lang; Xuan V Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 3.  Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Alarifi; Timothy Patrick; Abdulrahman Jabour; Min Wu; Jake Luo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  What radiologists need to know about patients' expectations: P.A.T.I.E.N.T.S C.A.R.E.R.S A.I.M.S.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Remotely shared CT-derived presurgical understanding of lung cancer: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Soon Ho Yoon; Kwon Joong Na; Chang Hyun Kang; In Kyu Park; Samina Park; Jin Mo Goo; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Enhancing patient value efficiently: Medical history interviews create patient satisfaction and contribute to an improved quality of radiologic examinations.

Authors:  Knud Nairz; Ingrid Böhm; Sebastiano Barbieri; Dieter Fiechter; Nicola Hošek; Johannes Heverhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Overcoming communication barriers in a multicultural radiography setting.

Authors:  Cherise Janse van Vuuren; Barbara van Dyk; Padidi L Mokoena
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2021-06-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.