Literature DB >> 28631161

The role of eABR with intracochlear test electrode in decision making between cochlear and brainstem implants: preliminary results.

Betul Cicek Cinar1,2, Mehmet Yarali3, Gamze Atay4, Munir Demir Bajin4, Gonca Sennaroglu3, Levent Sennaroglu4.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to discuss the findings of intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) test results with a recently designed intracochlear test electrode (ITE) in terms of their relation to decisions of cochlear or auditory brainstem implantation. This clinical study was conducted in Hacettepe University, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Audiology. Subjects were selected from inner ear malformation (IEM) database. Eleven subjects with profound sensorineural hearing loss were included in the current study with age range from 1 year 3 months to 4 years 3 months for children with prelingual hearing loss. There was only one 42-year-old post-lingual subject. eABR was recorded with an ITE and intraoperatively with an original cochlear implant (CI) electrode in 11 cases with different IEMs. Findings of eABR with ITE and their relation to the decision for CI or auditory brainstem implant (ABI) are discussed. Positive eABR test results were found to be dependent on close to normal cochlear structures and auditory nerve. The probability of positive result decreases with increasing degree of malformation severity. The prediction value of eABR via ITE on decision for hearing restoration was found to be questionable in this study. The results of eABR with ITE have predictive value on what we will get with the actual CI electrode. ITE appears to stimulate the cochlea like an actual CI. If the eABR is positive, the results are reliable. However, if eABR is negative, the results should be evaluated with preoperative audiological testing and MRI findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brainstem implants; Cochlear implant; Cochlear nerve deficiency; Inner ear malformation; eABR

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28631161     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4643-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia.

Authors:  Jerome Valero; Susan Blaser; Blake C Papsin; Adrian L James; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Cochlea Nerve Aplasia and Hypoplasia.

Authors:  Catherine S Birman; Harry R F Powell; William P R Gibson; Elizabeth J Elliott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  The Therapeutic Dilemma of Cochlear Nerve Deficiency: Cochlear or Brainstem Implantation?

Authors:  Liliana Colletti; Giacomo Colletti; Marco Mandalà; Vittorio Colletti
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Auditory brainstem implantation in children and non-neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: a consensus statement.

Authors:  Levent Sennaroglu; Vittorio Colletti; Manuel Manrique; Roland Laszig; Erwin Offeciers; Shakeel Saeed; Richard Ramsden; Sarp Sarac; Simon Freeman; Helge Rask Andersen; Andrzej Zarowski; Ibrahim Ziyal; Wolf-Peter Sollmann; Jan Kaminsky; Bartolomé Bejarano; Ahmet Atas; Gonca Sennaroglu; Esra Yucel; Sebnem Sevinc; Lilli Colletti; Alicia Huarte; Lise Henderson; Thomas Wesarg; Konrad Konradsson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal.

Authors:  Mee Hyun Song; Mi Ran Bae; Hee Nam Kim; Won-Sang Lee; Won Sun Yang; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Cochlear implantation in children with labyrinthine anomalies and cochlear nerve deficiency: implications for auditory brainstem implantation.

Authors:  Craig A Buchman; Holly F B Teagle; Patricia A Roush; Lisa R Park; Debora Hatch; Jennifer Woodard; Carlton Zdanski; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 7.  Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.

Authors:  Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Recent Rehabilitation Experience with Pediatric ABI Users.

Authors:  Esra Yücel; Filiz Aslan; Hilal Burcu Özkan; Levent Sennaroğlu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  Pediatric cochlear implantation of children with eighth nerve deficiency.

Authors:  Nancy M Young; Francine M Kim; Maura E Ryan; Elizabeth Tournis; Stephanie Yaras
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 1.675

10.  Variable long-term outcomes from cochlear implantation in children with hypoplastic auditory nerves.

Authors:  Jane Bradley; Timothy Beale; John Graham; Mary Bell
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2008-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Kent Tadokoro; Matthew Robert Bartindale; Nadeem El-Kouri; Dennis Moore; Christopher Britt; Matthew Kircher
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-06-08

2.  The sensitivity of different methods for detecting abnormalities in auditory nerve function.

Authors:  Tianhao Lu; Qiang Li; Chen Zhang; Min Chen; Zhengming Wang; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.819

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.