Literature DB >> 28630955

Chairside systems: a current review.

Markus Zaruba, Albert Mehl.   

Abstract

Since Cerec (Chairside Economical Restoration of Esthetic Ceramics) was introduced as the first dental chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system in the mid-1980s, this technology has enjoyed growing popularity, particularly in the recent past. There has been a considerable increase in the number of available chairside systems in only the last few years. One of the main reasons for this is that intraoral scanners have become increasingly better, smaller, and faster, while the design software has become more and more user-friendly. Many work steps are now automated, and a very large range of materials is now available for dental chairside applications. These advances have driven the rapid increase in the range of indications for chairside dentistry in the areas of prosthodontics, dental implantology, and orthodontics, and have paved the way for more novel treatment and treatment planning strategies. Another reason is that intraoral scanner-based digital impression techniques are already superior to conventional impression techniques in certain respects. Moreover, the quality of fit of digitally designed dental restorations is constantly improving because of advances in milling machine technology. Due to the sheer number of new possibilities, it is only a matter of time before chairside systems become a standard component of dental practice. This article reviews the actual advantages and limitations of the chairside workflow, and provides a summary of all the available chairside systems available today.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28630955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Dent        ISSN: 1463-4201            Impact factor:   1.883


  10 in total

1.  Restorative CAD/CAM materials in dentistry: analysis of their fluorescence properties and the applicability of the fluorescence-aided identification technique (FIT).

Authors:  Christian Klein; Matthias Krespach; Sebastian Spintzyk; Diana Wolff; Christiane von Ohle; Christian Meller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models.

Authors:  Olja Glisic; Louise Hoejbjerre; Liselotte Sonnesen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria.

Authors:  Ivett Róth; Alexandra Czigola; Dóra Fehér; Viktória Vitai; Gellért Levente Joós-Kovács; Péter Hermann; Judit Borbély; Bálint Vecsei
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 4.  Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Francesco Mangano; Andrea Gandolfi; Giuseppe Luongo; Silvia Logozzo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Ultrafine particles in scanning sprays: a standardized examination of five powders used for dental reconstruction.

Authors:  E Ochsmann; P Brand; T Kraus; S Reich
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Paulo Ribeiro; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Carmen Díaz-Castro; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Roberto Padrós; Javier Gil Mur; Carlos Falcão
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Comprehensive CAD/CAM Prosthetic Rehabilitation Management in a Young Patient with Agenesis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Noémie Drancourt; Emmanuel Nicolas; Jean-Luc Veyrune; Marion Bessadet
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 8.  Intraoral Scanners in Orthodontics: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Isidora Christopoulou; Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Miltiadis A Makrygiannakis; Ilias Bitsanis; Paula Perlea; Apostolos I Tsolakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Sabina Saccomanno; Stefano Saran; Valeria Vanella; Rodolfo Francesco Mastrapasqua; Luca Raffaelli; Luca Levrini
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08

Review 10.  Review on Polymer, Ceramic and Composite Materials for CAD/CAM Indirect Restorations in Dentistry-Application, Mechanical Characteristics and Comparison.

Authors:  Aleksandra Skorulska; Paweł Piszko; Zbigniew Rybak; Maria Szymonowicz; Maciej Dobrzyński
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.