Literature DB >> 28630535

Tests for stochastic ordering under biased sampling.

Hsin-Wen Chang1, Hammou El Barmi2, Ian W McKeague3.   

Abstract

In two-sample comparison problems it is often of interest to examine whether one distribution function majorizes the other, i.e., for the presence of stochastic ordering. This paper develops a nonparametric test for stochastic ordering from size-biased data, allowing the pattern of the size bias to differ between the two samples. The test is formulated in terms of a maximally-selected local empirical likelihood statistic. A Gaussian multiplier bootstrap is devised to calibrate the test. Simulation results show that the proposed test outperforms an analogous Wald-type test, and that it provides substantially greater power over ignoring the size bias. The approach is illustrated using data on blood alcohol concentration of drivers involved in car accidents, where the size bias is due to drunker drivers being more likely to be involved in accidents. Further, younger drivers tend to be more affected by alcohol, so in making comparisons with older drivers the analysis is adjusted for differences in the patterns of size bias.

Entities:  

Keywords:  empirical likelihood; length bias; order-restricted inference; size bias; weighted distributions

Year:  2016        PMID: 28630535      PMCID: PMC5473665          DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2016.1225048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nonparametr Stat        ISSN: 1026-7654            Impact factor:   1.231


  6 in total

1.  Order-restricted semiparametric inference for the power bias model.

Authors:  Ori Davidov; Konstantinos Fokianos; George Iliopoulos
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism.

Authors:  Andrew G Clark; Melissa J Hubisz; Carlos D Bustamante; Scott H Williamson; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for length-biased data.

Authors:  J Ning; J Qin; M Asgharian; Y Shen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Disparities in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival in nonelderly adult patients with cancer according to insurance status.

Authors:  Gary V Walker; Stephen R Grant; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Karen E Hoffman; Benjamin D Smith; Matthew Koshy; Pamela K Allen; Usama Mahmood
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Empirical likelihood-based tests for stochastic ordering.

Authors:  Hammou El Barmi; Ian W McKeague
Journal:  Bernoulli (Andover)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.595

6.  Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival.

Authors:  Stephen W Duffy; Iris D Nagtegaal; Matthew Wallis; Fay H Cafferty; Nehmat Houssami; Jane Warwick; Prue C Allgood; Olive Kearins; Nancy Tappenden; Emma O'Sullivan; Gill Lawrence
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.