Literature DB >> 28630213

Dose-Finding Methods: Moving Away from the 3 + 3 to Include Richer Outcomes.

Xavier Paoletti1,2, Damien Drubay3,2, Laurence Collette4.   

Abstract

The most commonly used method for dose finding, the 3 + 3, has poor performance. New adaptive designs are more efficient. Nevertheless, they have reached a maximum performance level, and further improvement requires either larger sample sizes or outcomes measures richer than the simplistic severe toxicity measured at cycle 1. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 3977-9. ©2017 AACRSee related article by Yan et al., p. 3994. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28630213     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  2 in total

1.  Proportional odds assumption for modeling longitudinal ordinal multiple toxicity outcomes in dose finding studies of targeted agents: A pooled analysis of 54 studies.

Authors:  Damien Drubay; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-01-25

2.  Advancing the Science and Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Bridging the Divide between Academic and Community Practices.

Authors:  Nicholas J Salgia; Errol J Philip; Mohammadbagher Ziari; Kelly Yap; Sumanta Kumar Pal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.