Literature DB >> 28630092

Characterization of High-Avidity Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells with Differential Tetramer Binding Coappearing after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Justyna Ogonek1, Kriti Verma2, Christian Schultze-Florey2,3, Pavankumar Varanasi1,4, Susanne Luther2, Patrick Schweier2, Wolfgang Kühnau5, Gudrun Göhring5, Elke Dammann2, Michael Stadler2, Arnold Ganser2, Ulrike Koehl6, Christian Koenecke2,3, Eva M Weissinger1,4, Lothar Hambach7.   

Abstract

CMV reactivation is a major complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Immune reconstitution of CMV-specific CTLs (CMV-CTLs) is essential for virus control. During CMV-CTL monitoring using mutated HLA/CMV tetramers selectively detecting high-avidity T cells, we observed coappearance of CMV-CTLs with low (CMV tetlow CTLs) and high tetramer binding (CMV tethigh CTLs) in 53/115 CMV IgG+ patients stem cell transplanted from CMV IgG+ donors. However, the relevance of these coappearing differentially tetramer binding ("dual") CMV-CTLs was unclear. In this study, we investigated the kinetics, properties, and clinical impact of coappearing CMV tetlow and tethigh CTLs after allogeneic SCT. Patients with dual CMV-CTLs had more CMV tethigh than tetlow CTLs. Chimerism analysis of isolated CMV tetlow and tethigh CTLs revealed their exclusive donor origin. CMV tetlow and tethigh CTLs had an identical effector memory CD45RA-CCR7- and CD45RA+CCR7- T cell distribution, equal differentiation, senescence, and exhaustion marker expression and were negative for regulatory CD8+ T cell markers. Isolated CMV tetlow and tethigh CTLs were equally sensitive to CMV peptides in IFN-γ release and cytotoxicity assays. However, CMV tethigh CTLs proliferated more in response to low CMV peptide concentrations than tetlow CTLs. TCR repertoire analysis revealed that CMV tetlow and tethigh CTLs use different TCRs. Finally, dual CMV-CTLs were not associated with CMV antigenemia. In conclusion, these data show for the first time, to our knowledge, that both CMV tetlow and tethigh CTLs are functional effector T cells differing by proliferation, numbers in peripheral blood, and probably by their precursors without increasing the CMV reactivation risk after allogeneic SCT.
Copyright © 2017 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28630092     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  9 in total

1.  Rapid Acquisition of Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells with a Differentiated Phenotype, in Nonviremic Hematopoietic Stem Transplant Recipients Vaccinated with CMVPepVax.

Authors:  Corinna La Rosa; Jeffrey Longmate; Chetan Raj Lingaraju; Qiao Zhou; Teodora Kaltcheva; Nicola Hardwick; Ibrahim Aldoss; Ryotaro Nakamura; Don J Diamond
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Immune Monitoring for CMV in Transplantation.

Authors:  Michelle K Yong; Sharon R Lewin; Oriol Manuel
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  How to dissect the plasticity of antigen-specific immune response: a tissue perspective.

Authors:  D Amodio; V Santilli; P Zangari; N Cotugno; E C Manno; S Rocca; P Rossi; C Cancrini; A Finocchi; A Chassiakos; C Petrovas; P Palma
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Organized immune cell interactions within tumors sustain a productive T-cell response.

Authors:  Maria A Cardenas; Nataliya Prokhnevska; Haydn T Kissick
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.823

5.  Early primed KLRG1- CMV-specific T cells determine the size of the inflationary T cell pool.

Authors:  Nicolas S Baumann; Suzanne P M Welten; Nicole Torti; Katharina Pallmer; Mariana Borsa; Isabel Barnstorf; Jennifer D Oduro; Luka Cicin-Sain; Annette Oxenius
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.823

6.  Hepatitis E Virus (HEV)-Specific T Cell Receptor Cross-Recognition: Implications for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Chai Fen Soon; Shihong Zhang; Pothakamuri Venkata Suneetha; Dinler Amaral Antunes; Michael Peter Manns; Solaiman Raha; Christian Schultze-Florey; Immo Prinz; Heiner Wedemeyer; Margaret Sällberg Chen; Markus Cornberg
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  The Presence of a CMV Immunodominant Allele in the Recipient Is Associated With Increased Survival in CMV Positive Patients Undergoing Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Dolores Grosso; Benjamin Leiby; Matthew Carabasi; Joanne Filicko-O'Hara; Sameh Gaballa; William O'Hara; John L Wagner; Neal Flomenberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Cytomegalovirus-Specific CD8+ T-Cells With Different T-Cell Receptor Affinities Segregate T-Cell Phenotypes and Correlate With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas Poiret; Rebecca Axelsson-Robertson; Mats Remberger; Xiao-Hua Luo; Martin Rao; Anurupa Nagchowdhury; Anna Von Landenberg; Ingemar Ernberg; Olle Ringden; Markus Maeurer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Assessing Anti-HCMV Cell Mediated Immune Responses in Transplant Recipients and Healthy Controls Using a Novel Functional Assay.

Authors:  Charlotte J Houldcroft; Sarah E Jackson; Eleanor Y Lim; George X Sedikides; Emma L Davies; Claire Atkinson; Megan McIntosh; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Georgina Okecha; Frederike J Bemelman; Richard J Stanton; Matthew Reeves; Mark R Wills
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.