Hui-Bin Huang1, Jin-Min Peng2, Biao Xu3, Guang-Yun Liu2, Bin Du4. 1. Medical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking, People's Republic of China; Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, People's Republic of China. 2. Medical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking, People's Republic of China. 3. Critical Care Medicine Center, the PLA 302 Hospital, Fengtai District, Beijing, People's Republic of China. 4. Medical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: dubin98@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (EI) in ICU patients is associated with an increased risk of life-threatening adverse events due to unstable conditions, rapid deterioration, limited preparation time, and variability in the expertise of operators. The goal of this study was to compare the effect of video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in ICU patients requiring EI. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception through January 30, 2017. Randomized controlled trials were included if they reported data on any of the predefined outcomes in ICU patients requiring EI and managed with VL or DL. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with accompanying 95% CIs. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials with 1,301 patients were included. Despite better glottic visualization with VL (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.43; P = .003), use of VL did not result in a significant increase in the first-attempt success rate (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92-1.26; P = .35) compared with DL. In addition, time to intubation (MD = 4.12 s; 95% CI, -15.86-24.09; P = .69), difficult intubation (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.30-1.70; P = .45), mortality (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25; P = .83), and most other complications were similar between the VL and DL groups. CONCLUSIONS: The VL technique did not increase the first-attempt success rate during EI in ICU patients compared with DL. These findings do not support routine use of VL in ICU patients.
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (EI) in ICU patients is associated with an increased risk of life-threatening adverse events due to unstable conditions, rapid deterioration, limited preparation time, and variability in the expertise of operators. The goal of this study was to compare the effect of video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in ICU patients requiring EI. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception through January 30, 2017. Randomized controlled trials were included if they reported data on any of the predefined outcomes in ICU patients requiring EI and managed with VL or DL. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with accompanying 95% CIs. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials with 1,301 patients were included. Despite better glottic visualization with VL (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.43; P = .003), use of VL did not result in a significant increase in the first-attempt success rate (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92-1.26; P = .35) compared with DL. In addition, time to intubation (MD = 4.12 s; 95% CI, -15.86-24.09; P = .69), difficult intubation (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.30-1.70; P = .45), mortality (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25; P = .83), and most other complications were similar between the VL and DL groups. CONCLUSIONS: The VL technique did not increase the first-attempt success rate during EI in ICU patients compared with DL. These findings do not support routine use of VL in ICU patients.
Authors: Luca Cabrini; Giovanni Landoni; Martina Baiardo Redaelli; Omar Saleh; Carmine D Votta; Evgeny Fominskiy; Alessandro Putzu; Cézar Daniel Snak de Souza; Massimo Antonelli; Rinaldo Bellomo; Paolo Pelosi; Alberto Zangrillo Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-01-20 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Timmy Li; Daniel Jafari; Cristy Meyer; Ashley Voroba; Ghania Haddad; Samuel Abecassis; Matthew Bank; Akiva Dym; Ali Naqvi; Rashmeet Gujral; Daniel Rolston Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2021-01-22
Authors: Florian J Raimann; Daniel M Tepperis; Dirk Meininger; Kai Zacharowski; Richard Schalk; Christian Byhahn; Christian F Weber; Haitham Mutlak Journal: Emerg Med Int Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 1.112