Literature DB >> 28629729

A multicenter study of routine versus selective intraoperative leak testing for sleeve gastrectomy.

Jason Bingham1, Jedediah Kaufman2, Kai Hata3, James Dickerson3, Alec Beekley4, Gordon Wisbach5, Jacob Swann6, Eric Ahnfeldt6, Devon Hawkins7, Yong Choi7, Robert Lim8, Matthew Martin9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staple line leaks after sleeve gastrectomy are dreaded complications. Many surgeons routinely perform an intraoperative leak test (IOLT) despite little evidence to validate the reliability, clinical benefit, and safety of this procedure.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of IOLT and if routine use has any benefit over selective use.
SETTING: Eight teaching hospitals, including private, university, and military facilities.
METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective analysis over a 5-year period. The efficacy of the IOLT for identifying unsuspected staple line defects and for predicting postoperative leaks was evaluated. An anonymous survey was also collected reflecting surgeons' practices and beliefs regarding IOLT.
RESULTS: From January 2010 through December 2014, 4284 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy. Of these, 37 patients (.9%) developed a postoperative leak, and 2376 patients (55%) received an IOLT. Only 2 patients (0.08%) had a positive finding. Subsequently, 21 patients with a negative IOLT developed a leak. IOLT demonstrated a sensitivity of only 8.7%. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased leak rates when an IOLT was performed versus when IOLT was not performed. Leak rates were not statistically different between centers that routinely perform IOLT versus those that selectively perform IOLT.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine IOLT had very poor sensitivity and was negative in 91% of patients who later developed postoperative leaks. The use of IOLT was not associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative leaks, and routine IOLT had no benefit over selective leak testing. IOLT should not be used as a quality indicator or "best practice" for bariatric surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; Intraoperative leak test; Sleeve gastrectomy; Staple line leak

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28629729     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  4 in total

1.  Perioperative Practices Concerning Sleeve Gastrectomy - a Survey of 863 Surgeons with a Cumulative Experience of 520,230 Procedures.

Authors:  Md Tanveer Adil; Ali Aminian; Aparna Govil Bhasker; Reynu Rajan; Ricard Corcelles; Carlos Zerrweck; Yitka Graham; Kamal Mahawar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Comparison Between Stable Line Reinforcement by Barbed Suture and Non-reinforcement in Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Prospective Controlled Study.

Authors:  Mohamed Hany; Mohammed Ibrahim
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The Birmingham experience of high-pressure methylene blue dye test during primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  G C Kirby; C A W Macano; S M Nyasavajjala; M Sahloul; R Nijjar; M Daskalakis; M Richardson; R Singhal
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-09-28

4.  Endoscopy Used as Provocative Testing in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the Texas Public Use Data File.

Authors:  Benjamin Clapp; Evan Liggett; Cheng Ma; Christian Castro; Simon Montelongo; Kelsey Van Noy; Joshua Dilday; Alan Tyroch
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.