Miho Nakao1, Kazuhiro Katayama2, Junko Fukuda1, Suetsumi Okagaki1, Kozo Misu3, Sayako Miyazaki3, Noritoshi Matsuno3, Reiko Ashida1, Tatsuya Ioka1, Yuri Ito4, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa5. 1. Department of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan(1). 2. Department of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan(1); Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan(1). Electronic address: katayama-ka@mc.pref.osaka.jp. 3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan(1). 4. Center of Cancer Control and Statistics, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan(1). 5. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Japan(1).
Abstract
PURPOSE: The ability to detect pancreatic cysts was compared between special ultrasonography (US) examination focusing on the pancreas (special pancreatic US) and routine upper abdominal ultrasonography to objectively assess the ability of the former to detect cysts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Of 3704 patients who underwent special pancreatic US at our hospital, 186 underwent routine upper abdominal US within six months, had pancreatic cysts, and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In these patients, 447 cysts measuring ≥5mm were detected via MRI, which was used as the gold standard. The ability and sensitivity of the US modalities to detect each cyst was determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity of special pancreatic US was 92.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.7%-94.7%) and that of routine upper abdominal US was 70.2% (95% CI, 66.0%-74.5%). McNemar test (Stata Version 13.1) revealed a significant difference in the cyst (≥5mm) detection sensitivity between the two modalities (p<0.001). An analysis stratified by patients similarly revealed a significant difference between the two modalities (p<0.001). The cyst detection sensitivity was also analyzed in various parts of the pancreas. The sensitivity of special pancreatic US was 88.7% for the uncinate process and inferior head, 97.5% for the head, 97.1% for the body, 89.0% for the body-tail, and 66.7% for the tail, whereas that of routine upper abdominal US was 74.2% for the uncinate process, 69.5% for the head, 81.0% for the body, 67.0% for the body-tail, and 26.7% for the tail. The McNemar test revealed significant differences in the sensitivity of the two modalities for all pancreatic parts (p<0.001-0.016). CONCLUSION: Compared with routine upper abdominal US, special pancreatic US had higher sensitivity in detecting pancreatic cysts.
PURPOSE: The ability to detect pancreatic cysts was compared between special ultrasonography (US) examination focusing on the pancreas (special pancreatic US) and routine upper abdominal ultrasonography to objectively assess the ability of the former to detect cysts. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Of 3704 patients who underwent special pancreatic US at our hospital, 186 underwent routine upper abdominal US within six months, had pancreatic cysts, and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In these patients, 447 cysts measuring ≥5mm were detected via MRI, which was used as the gold standard. The ability and sensitivity of the US modalities to detect each cyst was determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity of special pancreatic US was 92.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.7%-94.7%) and that of routine upper abdominal US was 70.2% (95% CI, 66.0%-74.5%). McNemar test (Stata Version 13.1) revealed a significant difference in the cyst (≥5mm) detection sensitivity between the two modalities (p<0.001). An analysis stratified by patients similarly revealed a significant difference between the two modalities (p<0.001). The cyst detection sensitivity was also analyzed in various parts of the pancreas. The sensitivity of special pancreatic US was 88.7% for the uncinate process and inferior head, 97.5% for the head, 97.1% for the body, 89.0% for the body-tail, and 66.7% for the tail, whereas that of routine upper abdominal US was 74.2% for the uncinate process, 69.5% for the head, 81.0% for the body, 67.0% for the body-tail, and 26.7% for the tail. The McNemar test revealed significant differences in the sensitivity of the two modalities for all pancreatic parts (p<0.001-0.016). CONCLUSION: Compared with routine upper abdominal US, special pancreatic US had higher sensitivity in detecting pancreatic cysts.