| Literature DB >> 28629354 |
Ishaku L Elisha1,2, Francien S Botha1, Balungile Madikizela1, Lyndy J McGaw1, Jacobus N Eloff3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is a world-wide problem affecting humans and animals. There is increasing development of resistance of the pathogens to current antimycobacterial agents. Many authors have investigated activities of extracts and isolated compounds from plants. The traditional uses of plants have frequently been the criterion to select plants investigated. In this contribution, we investigate whether plant extracts with very good activity against Escherichia coli may also be active against mycobacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Antimycobacterial; Minimum inhibitory concentration; Plant extracts; Selectivity index
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28629354 PMCID: PMC5477271 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1831-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and total antimycobacterial activity (TAA) and selectivity index (SI) of the eight selected acetone leaf extracts against Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium aurum. The SI and TAA values of the extracts were calculated from the cytotoxicity and percentage yield of the extracts results published in Elisha et al. [21]
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plants | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI | MIC (mg/ml) | TAA (ml/g) | SI |
|
| 0.63 | 190.42 | 0.11 | 1.25 | 95.97 | 0.05 | 1.25 | 95.97 | 0.05 |
|
| 0.04 | 504.17 | 1.44 | 0.02 | 1008.33 | 2.87 | 0.08 | 252.08 | 0.72 |
|
| 1.25 | 20.83 | 0.06 | 2.5 | 10.41 | 0.03 | 2.5 | 10.41 | 0.03 |
|
| 1.25 | 18.43 | 0.04 | 1.25 | 18.43 | 0.04 | 2.5 | 9.21 | 0.02 |
|
| 1.25 | 22.91 | 0.01 | 1.25 | 22.91 | 0.01 | 2.5 | 11.45 | 0.01 |
|
| 0.16 | 695.21 | 0.01 | 0.31 | 358.82 | 0.01 | 2.5 | 44.49 | 0 |
|
| 2.5 | 35.99 | 0 | 1.25 | 71.97 | 0 | 2.5 | 35.99 | 0 |
|
| 0.63 | 29.31 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 59.57 | 0.13 | 2.5 | 7.39 | 0.02 |
| Mean | 0.96 | NA | NA | 1.02 | NA | NA | 2.04 | NA | NA |
| SD | 0.74 | NA | NA | 0.74 | NA | NA | 0.85 | NA | NA |
| Streptomycin | 0.02 | NA | NA | 0.01 | NA | NA | 0.01 | NA | NA |
| Rifampicin | 0.06 | NA | NA | 0.02 | NA | NA | 0.01 | NA | NA |
NA Not applicable
Fig. 1The mean MIC values (mg/ml) of acetone leaf extracts of the different medicinal plants and the positive controls (Streptomycin and Rifampicin) against M. smegmatis, M. fortuitum and M. aurum. Legend: a, b and c = no statistical significant difference in the mean MIC values, p < 0.05. HR = Hypericum roeperianum, CT = Cremaspora triflora, HA = Heteromorpha arborescens, BS = Bolusanthus speciosus, CA = Calpurnia aurea, ML = Maesa lanceolata, EC = Elaeodendron croceum, MM = Morus mesozygia, Strept. =Streptomycin, Rifam. = Rifampicin
Fig. 2Sensitivity of the tested Mycobacterium spp. to the different plant acetone leaf extracts. Legend: ab = statistically significant difference in mean MIC, p < 0.05, when the sensitivity of M. aurum was compared to the MIC values of M. smegmatis and M. fortuitum