Literature DB >> 28628928

[Accurate OCT-angiography Interpretation - Detection and Exclusion of Artifacts].

Gabriele E Lang1, Christian Enders1, Max Loidl1, Gerhard K Lang1, Jens Ulrich Werner1.   

Abstract

Background Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) provides, non-invasively, a three-dimensional visualization of the microvasculature of the retina and choroid. However, image artifacts may occur in OCTA and have an impact on clinical interpretation. The aim of this article is to describe image artifacts of OCTA and to present a nomenclature. Methods OCTA examinations were performed with the AngioPlex™ OCTA-technology in combination with the CIRRUS HD-OCT 5000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, USA) as well as with the PlexElite 9000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, USA). Typical artifacts identified in the OCTA images are described and their causes are explained. Results There are three main groups of artifacts that can be distinguished: (a) artifacts that are inherent in the OCTA technology and occur with all types of devices (projection artifacts, masking, unmasking, loss of signal); (b) artifacts caused by data and image processing algorithms and whose frequency or severity may depend on the device type used (segmentation artifacts, duplications of vessels); (c) motion artifacts that vary in frequency and severity depending on the type of device used, as different methods (e.g., eye tracker) are used to reduce them. The occurrence of artifacts is also dependent on patient cooperation, the clarity of the optical media, and the pathology of the retina. Conclusion As in any other imaging method, artifacts also occur in OCTA images. Nevertheless, qualitative assessment of OCTA images is almost always possible and provides indispensable findings on the morphology and perfusion status of the retina and choroid. A good knowledge of possible artifacts, and a critical analysis of the complete OCTA data set, allows a correct interpretation and is essential for making a precise clinical diagnosis. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28628928     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-112857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  8 in total

Review 1.  Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society, the German Retina Society, and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on treatment of diabetic macular edema : Dated August 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Altered visual functions, macular ganglion cell and papillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in early-treated adult PKU patients.

Authors:  Csilla Serfozo; Andras Gellert Barta; Endre Horvath; Csaba Sumanszki; Bela Csakany; Miklos Resch; Zoltan Zsolt Nagy; Peter Reismann
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2020-09-22

3.  Reduced macular thickness and macular vessel density in early-treated adult patients with PKU.

Authors:  Csilla Serfozo; Andras Gellert Barta; Endre Horvath; Csaba Sumanszki; Bela Csakany; Miklos Resch; Zoltan Zsolt Nagy; Peter Reismann
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2021-05-05

4.  Toward quantitative and reproducible clinical use of OCT-Angiography.

Authors:  Ikrame Douma; David Rousseau; Rebecca Sallit; Laurent Kodjikian; Philippe Denis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Analysis of Foveal Microvascular Abnormalities in Diabetic Retinopathy Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography with Projection Artifact Removal.

Authors:  Lun Liu; Weili Bao; Chengyang Hu; Yajing Xu; Bingying Zhao; Jie Zheng; Lingling Fan; Yehuan Sun
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Imaging Artifacts and Segmentation Errors With Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Ying Cui; Ying Zhu; Jay C Wang; Yifan Lu; Rebecca Zeng; Raviv Katz; David M Wu; Demetrios G Vavvas; Deeba Husain; Joan W Miller; Leo A Kim; John B Miller
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Quantity and quality of image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography.

Authors:  Christian Enders; Gabriele E Lang; Jens Dreyhaupt; Max Loidl; Gerhard K Lang; Jens U Werner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of swept-source versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography for detection of macular neovascularization.

Authors:  Anna Lentzsch; Laura Schöllhorn; Christel Schnorr; Robert Siggel; Sandra Liakopoulos
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.117

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.